Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1996) Connectionist models of emotional distress and attentional bias. COGNITION & EMOTION, 10 (6). pp. 561-600. ISSN 0269-9931

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

It is proposed that connectionist models may contribute to the theory of attentional bias associated with emotional distress. The principal features of the bias shown in studies of the emotional Stroop test that simulations should capture are reviewed. Three broad mechanisms for simulating bias are identified: (1) high exposure to emotional stimuli during learning; (2) supernormally high intensity of emotional input; and (3) activation of task demand units associated with response to emotional stimuli. The suitability of these mechanisms for modelling emotional Stroop test findings was explored using a modification of the architecture developed by Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) to investigate the standard Stroop test. Manipulation of activation of a ''threat-monitoring'' task demand unit provided the pattern of performance closest to existing data from distressed individuals: an emotional Stroop effect on colour-naming of moderate magnitude, a large standard Stroop effect, and a minor facilitative bias in reading emotional words. Training of the threat-monitoring unit on either all emotion words, or on a single emotion word only, allows modelling of the interference effects associated with both general emotional distress and phobias. Generalisation of the effect across different emotional stimuli varied with the generality of the threat-monitoring task. Advantages and limitations of this connectionist approach are discussed.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Journal or Publication Title: COGNITION & EMOTION
Publisher: PSYCHOLOGY PRESS
ISSN: 0269-9931
Date: November 1996
Volume: 10
Number: 6
Number of Pages: 40
Page Range: pp. 561-600
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/18193

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us