Neither national boundaries nor transnational social spaces: accounting for variations of CSR practices in varieties of capitalism
Amaeshi, Kenneth (2008) Neither national boundaries nor transnational social spaces: accounting for variations of CSR practices in varieties of capitalism. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Amaeshi_24608.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
The paper empirically re-examines the role of national institutions and trans-national social spaces in accounting for variations in CSR practices. Based on a longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in UK and Germany, the paper concludes that corporate stakeholder salience patterns are outcomes of interaction effects between national institutional boundaries and trans-national social spaces. It pushes the institutionalist frontier of research to corporate stakeholder salience – which is a precursor and intrinsic to both corporate accountability and corporate social responsibility. In addition, it opens a new vista of looking at corporate social reports – i.e. not only as artefacts of accountability, but also carriers and reflectors of national and trans-national characteristics and influences. The paper finally highlights implications of the findings for CSR and comparative capitalism research, respectively.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Alternative Title:||Neither national boundaries nor transnational social spaces: accounting for variations of corporate social responsibility practices in varieties of capitalism|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Social responsibility of business -- Great Britain, Social responsibility of business -- Germany, Transnationalism -- Social aspects, Capitalism|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||21|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions – the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 3, 586–612. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., and Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values, The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5):507-525 Aguilera, R. and Jackson, G. (2003) The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), pp. 447– 465. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C.A., Conley, J. M. and Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US, Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (3), 147–158 Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press Amaeshi, K., Adi, B. C., Ogechie, C. and Amao, O. O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: Indigenous practices or Western influences?, Journal of Corporate Citizenship (winter edition). Amaeshi, K., Scarbrough, H., and Moore, R. (2007). Institutional co-entrepreneurship and the transnationalisation of the EU aerospace sector: a discourse analytic perspective Technology, Innovation and Institutions Working Paper Series, the University of Alberta School of Business, Canada http://www.business.ualberta.c/tcc/working_papers.htm Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, Macmillan Publishing Co. Bloomfield, B. P. and Danieli, A. (1995). The role of management consultants in the development of IT. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 1, 23–46. Borsch, A. (2004). Globalisation, shareholder value, restructuring: the (non)-transformation of Siemens. New Political Economy, 9(3):365-387 Boyer, R. (2005). How and why capitalisms differ. Economy and Society, 34(4):509-57 Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 946-967 Chapple, W., and Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44(4):415-39 Coates, D. (2005). Paradigms of Explanation. In: D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Houndmills Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.139-59 Crane A, and Livesey S. (2003). Are You Talking to Me? Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue. In Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking vol II: Relationships, communication, reporting and performance, Andriof J, Waddock, S, Rahman S S, Husted B (eds). Sheffield: Greenleaf; 39-52. Crane, A., Matten, D., and Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2):107-122 Crouch, C, (2005). Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs, Oxford University Press Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In: Translating organizational change. B. Czarniawska and G. Sevon (eds), 13-48. Berlin: De Gruyter Deeg, R., Jackson, G. (2007): The State of the Art: Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety, Socio-Economic Review, 5, 149-179. Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U. and Webster, Jr., F. E. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 57(1):23-27 Dore, R. ( 2000). Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Egan, C. and Shipley, D. (1995). Dimensions of customer orientation – an empirical investigation of the UK financial services sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 11, 807–16. Ellis, M. V., and Haase, R. F. (1987). Multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 34(4), 404-413. Faulconbridge, J., Engelen, E., Hoyler, M., and Beaverstock, J. (2007). Analysing the Changing Landscape of European Financial Centres: The Role of Financial Products and the Case of Amsterdam. Growth and Change 38 (2), 279–303. Fiss, P. C. and Zajac. E. J. (2004). The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501-534. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Freeman, R. E. (1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2):233-236 Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago IL, University of Chicago Press. Frynas, J. G. (1999). Oil in Nigeria: conflict and litigation between oil companies and village communities, Munster, Hamburg and London: Lit Verlag Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., and Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4): 321-345 Gago, R. F. and Antolin, M. N. (2004). Stakeholder salience in corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3):65-76 Gamble, G. O., Hsu, K., Jackson, C., and Tollerson, C. D. (1996). Environmental disclosures in annual reports: An international perspective. The International Journal of Accounting, 31(3):293-331 Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1):9-15 Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting, Organizations and Society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27:687-708 Gray, R., Kouchy, R., and Lavers, S. (1995b). Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2:78-101 Gray, R., Kouhy, R., and Lavers, S. (1995a). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2:47-77 Griffin, J. J. and Weber, J. (2006). Industry social analysis: examining the beer industry. Business & Society, 45:413-440 Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D.(Eds) (2001). Varieties of Capitalism – The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hancke, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (2007). Introduction: beyond varieties of capitalism. IN: B. Hancke, M. Rhodes and M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management – new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27:55-68 Ite, U. E. (2004). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1): 1-11 Ite, U. E. (2005). Poverty reduction in resource-rich developing countries: what have multinational corporations got to do with it? Journal of International Development, 17(7): 913-929 Jackson, B. (2001). Management Gurus and Management Fashions. London: Routledge. Jackson, G. (2005). Stakeholders under Pressure: corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan, Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (3), 419–428 Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20:163-179 Jones, M. T. and Fleming, P. (2003). Unpacking Complexity Through Critical Stakeholder Analysis The Case of Globalization, Business Society.2003; 42: 430-454 Jose, A. and Lee, S. (2007). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis based on Website Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4):307-321 Jürgens, U., and Naumann, K., Rupp, J. (2000). Shareholder Value in an Adverse Environment: The German Case. Economy and Society 29: 54-79. Kelly, G., Kelly, D., and Gamble, A. (Eds.) (1997). Stakeholder capitalism, Houndmills, Basignstoke: Macmillan Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5):279-291 Lober, D. J., Bynum, D., Campbell, E. and Jacques, M. (1997). The 100 plus corporate environmental report study: A survey of an evolving environmental management tool. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2):57-73 Maignan, I. (2001) Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-cultural Comparison, Journal of Business Ethics 30: 57-72. Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review Matten, D., and Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Towards an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166-179. Matten, D., and Moon, J. (2004). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. ICCSR Research Papers Series – ISSN1479-5124 No. 29-2004 http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/ICCSR/pdf/ResearchPdfs/29-2004.pdf visited July 1, 2005 McSweeney B. (2002b). The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55(11):1363-1372 McSweeney, B. (2002a). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1):89-118 Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., and Gray, S. J. (1995). Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3):555-572. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, D. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-86 Morgan, G. (2001). Transnational communities and business systems, Global Networks 1 (2), 113–130. Morgan, G. (2006) Transnational Actors, Transnational Institutions, Transnational spaces: The role of law firms in the internationalisation of competition regulation, in Djelic, M. - L. and Sahlin-Anderson, K. (eds) Transnational Regulation in the Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morgan, G. and Quack, S. (2005). Institutional Legacies and Firm Dynamics: The Growth and Internationalization of UK and German Law Firms. Organization Studies, 26 (12):1765-1786 O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3):406-436 O'Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(4):523–557. Owen, D. L., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C. and Bowerman, M. C. (2000). The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1):81-98 Panitch, L. and Gindin, S. (2005). Euro-capitalism and American Empire. In: D. Coates (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Houndmills Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.139-59 Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in Organizations. Boston, MA:Pitman Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The New Institutionalism of Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Schröder, U., and Schrader, A. (1998). The Changing Role of Banks and Corporate Governance in Germany: Evolution Toward the Market. Pp.17-34 in Competition and convergence in financial markets : the German and Anglo-American models, edited by Stanley W. Black. New York: Elsevier Science. Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4):493-511 Siu, N. Y. M. and Darby, R. (1995). Management Development and Customer Orientation: the Case of Foreign Joint Ventures in the People's Republic of China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2(2):60-74 Sturdy, A. and Fleming, P. (2003). Talk as Technique - A Critique of the Words and Deeds Distinction in the Diffusion of Customer Service Cultures in Call Centres, Journal of Management Studies 40 (4), 753–773. Sturdy, A. J. (1998). Customer care in a consumer society: smiling and sometimes meaning it. Organization, 5, 1, 27–53. Unerman, J. ( 2000). Reflections on Quantification in Corporate Social Reporting Content Analysis Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13 ( 5): 667– 680 Vitols, S. (2001). Varieties of corporate governance: comparing Germany and the UK. In: P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 337-360 Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press Whitley, R. (1999a). Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Whitley, R. (1999b). Firms, institutions and management control: The comparative analysis of coordination and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24:507-524.|
Actions (login required)