Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Poole, Christopher J., Earl, Helena M., Hiller, Louise, Dunn, Janet A., Bathers, Sarah, Grieve, Robert J., Spooner, David A., Agrawal, Rajiv K., Brunt, A. Murray, O’Reilly, Susan M. et al.
. (2006) Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, Vol.355 (No.18). pp. 1851-1862. ISSN 0028-4793

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Dunn_1851.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (241Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052084

Abstract

Background The National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT) and the BR9601 trial examined the efficacy of anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Methods In NEAT, we compared four cycles of epirubicin followed by four cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) with six cycles of CMF alone. In the BR9601 trial, we compared four cycles of epirubicin followed by four cycles of CMF, with eight cycles of CMF alone every 3 weeks. The primary end points were relapsefree and overall survival. The secondary end points were adverse effects, dose intensity, and quality of life. Results The two trials included 2391 women with early breast cancer; the median follow-up was 48 months. Relapse-free and overall survival rates were significantly higher in the epirubicin–CMF groups than in the CMF-alone groups (2-year relapse-free survival, 91% vs. 85%; 5-year relapse-free survival, 76% vs. 69%; 2-year overall survival, 95% vs. 92%; 5-year overall survival, 82% vs. 75%; P<0.001 by the log-rank test for all comparisons). Hazard ratios for relapse (or death without relapse) (0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001) and death from any cause (0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; P<0.001) favored epirubicin plus CMF over CMF alone. Independent prognostic factors were nodal status, tumor grade, tumor size, and estrogen-receptor status (P<0.001 for all four factors) and the presence or absence of vascular or lymphatic invasion (P = 0.01). These factors did not significantly interact with the effect of epirubicin plus CMF. The overall incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher with epirubicin plus CMF than with CMF alone but did not significantly affect the delivered-dose intensity or the quality of life. Conclusions Epirubicin plus CMF is superior to CMF alone as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003577.)

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Anthrcyclines -- Testing, Breast cancer, Drugs testing
Journal or Publication Title: New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society Publisher
ISSN: 0028-4793
Date: 2 November 2006
Volume: Vol.355
Number: No.18
Page Range: pp. 1851-1862
Identification Number: 10.1056/NEJMoa052084
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Final version (as published).
References: Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. (1992). Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy: 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Lancet, 339, pp. 71-85. Habeshaw, T. Paul, J. Jones, R. et al. (1991). Epirubicin at 2 dose levels with prednisolone as treatment for advanced breast-cancer: the results of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol,9, pp.295-304. Buzzoni, R. Bonadonna,G., Valagussa, P. Zambetti, M. (1991). Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the treatment of resectable breast cancer with more than 3 positive axillary nodes. J Clin Oncol, 9, pp. 2134-2140. Bonadonna, G. Zambetti, M. Moliterni, A. Gianni, L. Valagussa, P. (2004). Clinical relevance of different sequencing of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 22, pp.1614-1620. Bonadonna, G. Zambetti, M. Valagussa, P. (1995). Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes: ten-year results. JAMA, 273, pp.542-547. Moliterni, A. Bonadonna, G. Valagussa, P. Ferrari, L. Zambetti, M. (1991). Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with and without doxorubicin in the adjuvant treatment of resectable breast-cancer with one to three positive axillary nodes. J Clin Oncol, 9, pp.1124-1130. Norton, L. Day, R. (1991). Potential innovations in scheduling in cancer chemotherapy. In: DeVita, V.T. Jr. Hellman, S. Rosenberg, S.A. eds. Important advances in oncology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, pp. 57-72. Day, R.S. (1986). Treatment sequencing, asymmetry, and uncertainty: protocol strategies for combination chemotherapy. Cancer Res, 46, pp.3876-3885. Goldie, J.H. Coldman, A.J. (1979). A mathematical model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep, 63, pp. 1727-1733. Goldie, J.H. Coldman, A.J. Gudauskas, G.A. (1982). Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep, 66, pp. 439-449. Earl, H. Iddawela, M. (2004) Epirubicin as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 4, pp. 189-195. Goldhirsch, A. Colleoni, M. Coates, A.S. Castiglione-Gertsch, M. Gelber, R.D. (1998). Adding adjuvant CMF chemotherapy to either radiotherapy or tamoxifen: are all CMFs alike? Ann Oncol, 9, pp.489-493. Engelsman, E. Klijn, J.C. Rubens, R.D. et al. (1991). "Classical CMF" versus a 3-weekly intravenous CMF schedule in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: an EORTC Breast Cancer Co-operative Group Phase III Trial (10808). Eur J Cancer, 27, pp. 966-970. Bonadonna, G. Valagussa, P. ( 1981). Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 304, pp. 0-15. Kaplan, E.L. Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc, 53, pp. 457-481. Cox, D.R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc [B], 34, pp.187-220. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. (1990). Treatment of early breast cancer. Worldwide evidence 1985-1990. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Vol 1. Aaronson, N.K. Ahmedzai, S. Bergman, B. et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst, 85, pp. 365-376. Sprangers, M.A.G. Groenvold, M. Arraras, J.I. et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol, 14, pp. 2756-2768. Hunter, M.S. (1992). The Women's Health Questionnaire: a measure of mid-aged women's perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychol Health, 7, pp. 45-54. Qian, W. Parmar, M.K.B. Sambrook, R.J. Fayers, P.M. Girling, D.J. Stephens, R.J. (2000). Analysis of messy longitudinal data from a randomised clinical trial. Stat Med, 19, pp. 2657-2674. O'Brien, P.C. (1984). Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. Biometrics, 40, pp.1079-1087. Levine, M.N. Bramwell,,V.H. Pritchard, K.I. et al. (1998). Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol,16, pp. 2651-2658. French Adjuvant Study Group. (2001). Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol, 19, pp. 602-611. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. (1998). Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet, 352, pp. 930-942. Coombes, R.C. Bliss, J.M. Wils. J. et al. (1996). Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol, 14, pp. 35-45 Crump, M. Tu, D.S. Shepherd, L. Levine, M. Bramwell, V. Pritchard, K. (2003). Risk of acute leukemia following epirubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a report from the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol, 21, pp. 3066-3071. Praga, C. Bergh, J. Bliss, J. et al. (2005). Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol, 23, pp. 4179-4191 Pulsoni, A. Pagano, L. Lo Coco, F. et al. (2002). Clinicobiological features and outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia occurring as a second tumor: the GIMEMA experience. Blood, 100, pp. 1972-1976. Detourmignies, L. Castaigne, S. Stoppa, A.M. et al. (1992). Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia: a report on 16 cases. J Clin Oncol,10, pp. 1430-1435. Leonard, R.C. Lind, M. Twelves, C. et al. ( 2004). Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus single-cycle, autograft-supported, high-dose, late-intensification chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, pp. 1076-1083. Gianni, L. Baselga, J. Eiermann,W. et al. (2005). European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer (ECTO): improved freedom from progression (FFP) from adding paclitaxel (T) to doxorubicin (A) followed by cyclophosphamide methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). J Clin Oncol, 23: Suppl. 7S-7S. Hopwood, P. Ellis, P. Barrett-Lee, P. et al. (2005). Impact on quality of life (QL) during chemotherapy (CT) of FEC-T compared to FEC or E-CMF: results from the UKNCRI Taxotere as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial (TACT). J Clin Oncol, 23: Suppl. 43S-43S. Piccart-Gebhart, M.J. Proctor, M. Leyland-Jones, B. et al. (2005). Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 353, pp. 1659-1672. Buzdar, A.U. Ibrahim, N.K. Francis, D. et al. (2005). Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 23, pp. 3676-3685.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/187

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us