Bührs, Ton (2007) Towards a global political-economic architecture of environmental space. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Buhrs_wp23607.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (160Kb)

Abstract

The concept of environmental space (ES) has been put forward as a means of operationalising sustainability. Based on three tenets, the recognition of environmental limits, a strong equity principle, and a focus on resource consumption, the ES approach offers a cognitive framework for a comprehensive and integrated approach to environmental/resource policy and management. With growing concerns about mounting environmental pressures and looming ecological and resource scarcity, it offers also a more appealing normative basis for dealing with these issues than the ‘environmental security’ discourse increasingly appropriated by governments. In the 1990s, adoption of the environmental space approach was promoted foremost at the national level by a non-governmental organization and a handful of academics. Although some governments showed interest in the idea, it failed to make much headway. Reasons for that can be found in methodological issues, a weak political support basis, and the collective action trap. No governments adopted and implemented the ES approach as an overall framework for their sustainable development efforts, in part because accepting limits on resource consumption on a national level seems to make little sense as long as other countries are not willing to do the same (the collective action trap). A preliminary assessment brings up the existence of many significant obstacles to the adoption of the ES approach at the global level, whilst the agency basis is relatively weak and fragmented. Consequently, the chances of significantly changing the global political-institutional architecture to support an ES approach also seem dim. This leads to the conclusion that ‘What must be done, cannot be done’, at least at this stage. The best prospects for advancing the approach lie in the adoption of a global climate change regime based on the recognition of environmental limits and the acceptance of a strong equity principle, in line with the ES approach. This could set a precedent for the development of similar global regimes to address other areas of growing ecological and resource scarcity. In the mean time, a focus on limiting resource consumption associated with specific environmental issues offers the best basis for mobilising support for the adoption of ES principles.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences J Political Science > JC Political theory
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Environmentalism -- Political aspects, Sustainable development, International cooperation, Economics -- Political aspects
Series Name:	Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher:	University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	November 2007
Number:	No.236
Number of Pages:	36
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Adam, D.(2007), Move to Identify Climate Change Security Hotspots, The Guardian, 11 September, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/sep/11/climatechange Adams, R.(2007), Invasion of Iraq Was Driven by Oil, Says Greenspan, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2170660,00.html Aitken, W. (1980), "The 'Carrying Capacity' Equivocation", Social Theory and Practice, Vol.6, No.1, pp.1-11. Arrow, K., B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, B.-O. Jansson, S. Levin, K.-G. Maler, C. Perrings and D. Pimentel (1996), "Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment", Ecological Applications, Vol.6, No.1, pp.13-15. Barry, J. and R. Eckersley (2005), "An Introduction to Reinstating the State", in Barry, J. and R. Eckersley (eds.), The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Cambridge, Mass and London: MIT Press, pp.ix-xxv. Biermann, F. and S. Bauer (2005), A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance? Aldershot, Hants, England ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Brown, L. R. (2006, 1st ed.), Plan B 2.0 : Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. New York ; London: W. W. Norton & Co. Bührs, T. (2004), "Sharing Environmental Space: The Role of Law, Economics and Politics", Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, Vol.47, No.3, pp.431-449. Bührs, T. (2007), "Environmental Space as a Basis for Enhancing the Legitimacy of Global Governance", Paper presented at the conference Pathways to Legitimacy? The Future of Global and Regional Governance, University of Warwick, United Kingdom, 17-19 September. Buitenkamp, M., H. Venner and T. E. Wams (eds.) (1993), Actie Plan Duurzaam Nederland (Translated in English in 1993 under the Title Action Plan Sustainable Netherlands). Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth Netherlands. Buttel, F. H. (1998), "Some Observations on States, World Orders, and the Politics of Sustainability", Organisation and Environment, Vol.11, No.3, pp.261-286. Buzan, B. (2005), "International Political Economy and Globalization", in Bellamy, A. J. (ed.) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp.114-133. Campbell, J. L. (2002), "Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.28, pp.21-38. Carley, M. and P. Spapens (1998), Sharing the World: Sustainable Living and Global Equity in the 21st Century. London: Earthscan. Cerny, P. (1997), "Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalisation", Government and Opposition, Vol.36, No.2, pp.251-274. Charnovitz, S. (2005), "A World Environment Organization", in Chambers, W. B. and J. F. Green (eds.), Reforming International Environmental Governance: From Institutional Limits to Innovative Reforms. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, pp.93-123. Cohen, D. (2007), "Earth Audit", New Scientist, Vol.194, No.2605, pp.36-43. Conca, K. (2005), "Global Water Prospects", in Pirages, D. and K. Cousins (eds.), From Resource Scarcity to Ecological Security: Exploring New Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp.59-81. Conley, H. and W. Phillips (2005), "Energy, Security and Cooperation over the Next Quarter Century", in Pirages, D. and K. Cousins (eds.), From Resource Scarcity to Ecological Security: Exploring New Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp.105-126. De Jonge, W., J. V. Assche and B. Mazijn. (2001). Onderzoek Naar De Mogelijkheden En Beperkingen Van Het Concept Milieugebruiksruimte. Eindrapport 2001. Gent: CDO-RUG, Centrum voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling, Universiteit Gent. DeSombre, E. R. (2006), Global Environmental Institutions. New York, NY: Routledge. Dryzek, J. S. (1997), The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Dryzek, J. S., D. Downes, C. Hunold, D. Schlosberg and H.-K. Hernes (2003), Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. New York: Oxford University Press. Eckersley, R. (2004), The Green State. Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press. Fanelli, D. (2007), "Cuba Flies Lone Flag for Sustainability", New Scientist, Vol.196, No.2624, p.10. Friends of the Earth Europe (1995), Towards Sustainable Europe. The Study. Brussels: Friends of the Earth. Fukuyama, F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man. New York, Toronto: Free Press; Maxwell Macmillan Canada. Gibson, D. (2002), Environmentalism : Ideology and Power. Huntington, N.Y.: Nova Science. Gill, S. (2002), "The Political Economy of Globalization: The Old and the New", in Aksu, E. and J. A. Camilleri (eds.), Democratizing Global Governance. Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.77-89. Hamilton, C. (2003), Growth Fetish. Crows Nest, NSW (Australia): Allen & Unwin. Hille, J. (1997). The Concept of Environmental Space. Implications for Policies, Environmental Reporting and Assessments. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Jahn, D. (2005), "Sustaining Abundance: Environmental Performance in Western Democracies", Environmental Politics, Vol.14, No.1, pp.128-130. Kaplan, R. D. (1994), "The Coming Anarchy", The Atlantic Monthly, Vol.273, No.2, pp.44-74. Karbuz, S. (2007), Us Military Energy Consumption- Facts and Figures, http://www.energybulletin.net/29925.html, (Accessed: 24 October 2007) Kerr, R. A. (2007), "Oil Resources: Even Oil Optimists Expect Energy Demand to Outstrip Supply", Science, Vol.317, No.5837, p.437. Kovel, J. (2002), The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? New York: Zed Books. Levy, D. L. and P. J. Newell (2005a), The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Mass and London: MIT Press. Levy, D. L. and P. J. Newell (2005b), "A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Business in International Environmental Politics: An Interdisciplinary, Multilevel Framework", in Levy, D. L. and P. J. Newell (eds.), The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Mass and London: MIT Press, pp.47- 69. Meadowcroft, J. (2005), "From Welfare State to Ecostate", in Barry, J. and R. Eckersley (eds.), The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp.1-23. Moffatt, I. (1996), "An Evaluation of Environmental Space as the Basis for Sustainable Europe. " International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol.3, pp.49-69. Najam, A. (2003), "The Case against a New International Environmental Organisation", Governance, Vol.9, pp.367-384. Najam, A., D. Runnalls and M. Halle. (2007). Environment and Globalization: Five Propositions. Winnipeg, MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development. O'Connor, J. (1994a), "Is Sustainable Capitalism Possible?" in O'Connor, M. (ed.) Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology. New York and London: Guilford Press, pp.152-175. O'Connor, M. (1994b), Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology. New York: Guilford Press. O'Reilly, K. (2005), "Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution and Profit", Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, Vol.16, No.1, pp.125-127. Oates, W. E. and P. R. Portney (2003), "The Political Economy of Environmental Policy", in Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol 1. pp.325-354. Opschoor, J. B. and R. Weterings (1994), "Environmental Utilisation Space: An Introduction", Tijdschrift Voor Milieukunde, Vol.9, No.4, pp.198-205. Palan, R. (2000), "New Trends in Global Political Economy", in Palan, R. (ed.) Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories. London; New York: Routledge, pp.1-18. Pirages, D. and K. Cousins (2005), From Resource Scarcity to Ecological Security: Exploring New Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Raffaelli, M. (1995), Rise and Demise of Commodity Agreements. Am Investigation into the Breakdown of International Commodity Agreements. Abington, Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing. Ravenhill, J. (2005), Global Political Economy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Renner, M. (2005), "Security Redefined", in Renner, M., H. French and E. Assadourian (eds.), State of the World 2005. Redefining Global Security. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, pp.3-19. Ricupero, R. (2004). Past and Present: Our Next Forty Years. 12th Raúl Prebisch Lecture UNCTAD. Geneva. Ridgeway, J. (2004), It's All for Sale: The Control of Global Resources. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press. Sachs, W., R. Loske and M. Linz (1998), Greening the North: A Post-Industrial Blueprint for Ecology and Equity. London: Zed Books. Sandbach, F. (1980), Environment, Ideology, and Policy. Montclair, N.J.: Allanheld Osmun. Schwartz, P. and D. Randall. (2003). An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security. Scruggs, L. (2003), Sustaining Abundance: Environmental Performance in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shriner, R. (2007), Us Military Consumption, http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/schrinrj.html, (Accessed: 24 October 2007) Simonis, U. E. (2002), "Advancing the Debate on a World Environment Organization", The Environmentalist, Vol.22, pp.29-42. Simpson, R. D., M. A. Toman and R. U. Ayres (eds.) (2005), Scarcity and Growth Revisited: Natural Resources and the Environment in the New Millennium. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. SIPRI (2007), Sipri Yearbook 2007 - Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Chapter Summaries, (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute), http://yearbook2007.sipri.org/, (Accessed: 24 October 2007) Stewart, F. and A. Berry (1999), "Globalisation, Liberalization, and Inequality: Expectations and Experience", in Hurrell, A. and N. Woods (eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.150- 186. Stone, D. (1988), Policy Paradox and Practical Reason. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman, and Company. Strange, S. (1994, 2nd ed.), States and Markets. London ; New York New York, NY: Pinter Publishers ; Distributed in the USA and Canada by St. Martin's Press. Strange, S. (1996), The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Turse, N. (2007), "Planet Pentagon", Le Monde Diplomatique (English edition), No.August, pp.2-3. United Nations Environment Programme. (2007). Global Environmental Outlook 4. Environment for Development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2007). Global Environmental Outlook 4. Environment for Development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Wackernagel, M. and W. E. Rees (1996), Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society Publishers. Wade, R. H. (2003), "The Disturbing Rise in Poverty and Inequality: Is It a Big Lie?" in Held, D. and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds.), Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.18-46. Weterings, R. and J. B. Opschoor (1994), "Environmental Untilisation Space and Reference Values for Performance Evaluation", Tijdschrift Voor Milieukunde, Vol.9, No.4, pp.221-228. White, L. G. (1994), "Policy Analysis as Discourse", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol.13, No.3, pp.506-525. Wiedman, T., J. Minx, J. Barrett and M. Wackernagel (2006), "Allocating Ecological Footprints to Final Consumption Categories with Input-Output Analysis", Ecological Economics, Vol.56, No.1, pp.28-48. Williams, M. (1996), "International Political Economy and Global Environmental Change", in Vogler, J. and M. F. Imber (eds.), The Environment and International Relations. London: Routledge, pp.41-58. Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment and Energy. and Friends of the Earth Europe. (1995), Towards Sustainable Europe : The Study. Luton, England: Friends of the Earth.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1872

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item