The governance of the IMF: how a dual board structure could raise the effectiveness and legitimacy of a key global institution
Thimann, Christian, Just, Christian and Ritter, R. (Raymond) (2007) The governance of the IMF: how a dual board structure could raise the effectiveness and legitimacy of a key global institution. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Thimann_wp23407.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
The International Monetary Fund is currently engaged in a reform process to update its activities to the challenges of economic globalisation and establish it firmly as the central institution for international monetary cooperation. Yet, the current reforms may miss this aim because they do not foresee adjusting IMF governance so as to allow the Executive Board to become a forum for true international economic dialogue. Without such a change in governance, however, such economic dialogue is likely to continue moving outside the IMF, and spread in fora such as the G7, G20 or others that do not have universal status. This paper lays out a new proposal to adjust governance to make the IMF more effective in this area. It proposes to create a new smaller Board to deal with global economic issues of a systemic nature, and enlarge the current Board to make more room for developing countries, focusing it on country-related and technical matters, including bilateral surveillance and structural adjustment lending. The implementation of a dual Board structure is obviously challenging from an institutional point of view, and the paper discusses these challenges in detail. Yet, it would allow the IMF to be more effective and carry greater legitimacy vis-à-vis developing economies and at the same time play a more central role in international economic consultation and cooperation that in recent years has increasingly drifted towards the G-groups such as the G7, G20, G24 and other fora.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Alternative Title:||The governance of the International Monetary Fund: how a dual board structure could raise the effectiveness and legitimacy of a key global institution|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HG Finance
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||International Monetary Fund, Corporate governance, International economic relations, Globalization -- Economic aspects|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||29|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Adams, T. (2005), “The US View on IMF Reform”, Speech presented at the Conference on IMF Reform, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC (September). Bini Smaghi (2005), “IMF Governance and the Political Economy of a Consolidated European Seat”, in: E. Truman (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century. Institute for International Economics, Special Report no 19. Bird, G. (2006), “Running the IMF – Reducing Political Bias and Increasing Independence”, World Economics, vol. 7, no. 4: 111-124. Buira, A. (2003), The Governance of the International Monetary Fund, in: I. Kaul (ed.), Providing Global Public Goods – Managing Globalisation, Oxford University Press. Buchanan, A. and R. O. Keohane (2006), “The legitimacy of global governance institutions”, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 20, no. 4: 405-438. De Gregorio, J., B. Eichengreen, T. Ito and C. Wyplosz (1999), An Independent and Accountable IMF. Geneva Reports on the World Economy 1, International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva. Dodge, D. (2005), “Reflections on the International Economic and Monetary Order”, Speech at the Conférence de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (May). Dodge, D. (2006), “The Evolving International Monetary Order and the Need for an Evolving IMF”, Speech at Princeton University (March). Evans P. and M. Finnemore (2001), “Organizational reform and the expansion of the South’s voice at the Fund”, Washington DC. Heikenstein, L. (2005), “The IMF – Mandate, Means and Governance in a Changing World”, Speech at the IMF-Deutsche Bundesbank Symposium “The IMF in a Changing World”, Frankfurt (June). IMF (1999), “External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance – Report by a Group of Independent Experts”, EBAP/99/86, IMF, Washington DC. IMF (2005), “The Managing Director’s Report on the Fund’s Medium-Term Strategy”, Washington DC (September). IMF (2006a), “An Evaluation of the IMF’s Multilateral Surveillance”, Independent Evaluation Office of the IMF, Washington, DC. IMF (2006b), “The Managing Director’s Report on Implementing the Fund’s Medium-Term Strategy”, Washington DC (April). IMF (2006c), “By-laws, rules and regulations”, 60th issue, Washington DC. Kahler, M. (2006), “Internal Governance and IMF Performance”, in: Edwin M. Truman (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, pp. 257-270. Kenen, P.B. (2006), “IMF Reform: Comments on the Address of the Managing Director of the IMF at the book release meeting for Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC. Kenen, P. B., J. R. Shafer, N. L. Wicks, and C. Wyplosz (2004), International Economic and Financial Cooperation: New Issues, New Actors, New Responses, Geneva Reports on the Global Economy 6, International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva. King, M. (2006a): “Reform of the International Monetary Fund,” Speech at the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations New Delphi, India (February). King, M. (2006b): “Through the Looking Glass: Reform of the International Institutions”, Speech at the Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies, Australia (December). Portugal, M. (2005), “Improving IMF Governance and Increasing the Influence of Developing Countries in IMF Decision-Making”, G 24 Technical Group Meeting, Manila, Philippines (March). Thimann, C. (2007): “Two Boards for the IMF? A new policy proposal to strengthen the Fund’s governance and global role”, Paper presented at the conference New Challenges for the International Monetary System and Global Governance organised by the Reinventing Bretton Woods Committee, the South African Treasury and Reserve Bank and the World Economic Forum, Durban, South Africa, 5-6 September. Truman, E. (2006): A Strategy for IMF Reform, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC. Van Houtven (2004), “Rethinking IMF governance,” Finance and Development, September, pp. 18-20. Woods, N. (2001), “Making the IMF and the World Bank more Accountable”, International Affairs vol. 77, no. 1.|
Actions (login required)