Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Civil society and legitimation of global governance

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Scholte, Jan Aart (2007) Civil society and legitimation of global governance. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Scholte_wp22307.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (175Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

Along with the general intensified globalisation of social relations in contemporary history has come an unprecedented expansion of regulatory apparatuses that cover planetary jurisdictions and constituencies. On the whole, however, this global governance remains weak relative to pressing current needs for global public policy. Shortfalls in moral standing, legal foundations, material delivery, democratic credentials and charismatic leadership have together generated large legitimacy deficits in existing global regimes. This fragile overall legitimacy has in turn constituted a major obstacle to achieving the substantial further growth of global-scale regulation that is required to secure decent human lives for all in a more global world. Insufficient capacities for global governance and insufficient legitimacy of global governance are thus coupled in damaging mutual reinforcement. This paper argues that – although there are of course considerable variations across different global governance institutions and different civil society initiatives – the general picture has been one of but partially realised potentials of legitimacy promotion. Like the tip of the proverbial iceberg, civil society activities concerning global regulation have so far made visible only a fraction of the total mass of possibilities. Hence prescriptions for the future centre on ‘more’ and ‘better’. Regarding more quantity, urgently required greater positive legitimation of global governance can be promoted with more civil society engagement, covering more regulatory institutions and extending through more stages of the policy process. Regarding better quality, to have greater positive legitimation effects civil society relations with global governance generally need to be more inclusive, more competent, more coordinated, and more accountable. Both sides to the interchange – civil society associations on the one hand and global regulatory bodies on the other – can take a range of measures to further these ends.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Globalization -- Economic aspects, Civil society, International cooperation, Public policy (International law), Liability (Law)
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: March 2007
Number: No.223
Number of Pages: 43
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Ahrne, G. (1998) ‘Civil Society and Uncivil Organizations’, in J.C. Alexander (ed.), Real Civil Societies: Dilemmas of Institutionalization. London: Sage. Batliwala, S. and L.D. Brown (eds) (2006) Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. Bello, W. (2002) De-Globalization: Ideas for a New World Economy. London: Zed. Blagescu, M. and R. Lloyd (2006) 2006 Global Accountability Report: Holding Power to Account. London: One World Trust. Brown, L.D. et al. (2001) Practice-Research Engagement and Civil Society in a Globalizing World. Cambridge, MA: Hauser Centre for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University. Buchanan, A. and R.O. Keohane (2006) ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 405-38. Bull, B. and D. McNeill (2007) Development Issues in Global Governance: Market Multilateralism and Private-Public Partnerships. London: Routledge. Cardoso, F.H. et al. (2004) We The Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance. Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations. New York: United Nations General Assembly Document A/58/817. Chapman, J. and A. Wameyo (2001) Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy: A Scoping Study. London: ActionAid. Clark, J.D. (ed.) (2003) Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action. London: Earthscan. Cohen, J.L. and A. Arato (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CSGR (2007) Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Globalisation Index, at www.csgr.org, accessed on 9 January. Cutler, A.C. et al. (eds) (1999) Private Authority in International Affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Della Porta, D. et al. (2006) Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Ebrahim, A. and E. Weisband (eds) (2007) Global Accountabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edwards, M. (2000) NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance. London: Foreign Policy Centre. Edwards, M. (2004) Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity. Edwards, M. and J. Gaventa (eds) (2001) Global Citizen Action. Boulder, CO: Rienner. Eschle, C. and B. Maiguascha (eds) (2005) Critical Theories, International Relations and ‘The Anti-Globalisation Movement’: The Politics of Global Resistance. London: Routledge. FIM (2007) Website of the Montreal International Forum, www.fimcivilsociety.org, accessed on 17 March. Florini, A.M. (ed.) (2000) The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Tokyo/Washington, DC: Japan Center for International Exchange and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Fox, J.A. and L.D. Brown (eds) (1998) The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Friedrichs, J. (2001) ‘The Meaning of New Medievalism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7, no. 4 (December), pp. 475-502. GCS (2001–) Global Civil Society Yearbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press (annual). Gill, S. (2003) Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Gilson, J. (2002) Asia Meets Europe. Cheltenham: Elgar. GPF (2007) ‘Arria and Other Special Meetings between NGOs and Security Council Members’, website of the Global Policy Forum, www.globalpolicy.org/security/mtgsetc/brieindx.htm, accessed on 24 February. Grande, E. and L. Pauly (eds) (2004) Reconstituting Political Authority: Complex Sovereignty and the Foundations of Global Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Hall, R.B. and T.J. Biersteker (eds) (2003) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hänggi, H. et al., Interregionalism and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2005). Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin. Held, D. et al. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity. IMF (2003) ‘Guide for Staff Relations with Civil Society Organizations’, at www.imf.org/external/np/cso/eng/2003/101003.htm. INGO (2007) website of the INGO Accountability Charter, www.ingoaccountabilitycharter.org/, accessed on 23 February. Jordan, L. and P. van Tuijll (eds) (2006) NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles, and Innovations. London: Earthscan. Kaldor, M. (2003) Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity. Keane, J. (2003) Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Keck, M.E. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Kingsbury, B.W. and N. Krisch (eds) (2006) ‘Symposium on Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 17, pp. 1-278. Klein, N. (2000) No Logo. London: Flamingo. Martens, K. (2005) NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Adaptation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Munck, R. (2006) Globalisation and Contestation: The New Great Counter- Movement. London: Routledge. NSI (2007) Website of the North-South Institute, www.nsi-ins.ca, accessed on 17 March. O'Brien, R.J. et al. (2000) Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Raustiala, K. (2002) ‘The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 43, no. 1 (Fall), pp. 1-92 Reinicke, W.H. (1999-2000) ‘The Other World Wide Web: Global Public Policy Networks’, Foreign Policy, no. 117 (Winter), pp. 44-57. Robertson, R. (1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage. Ronit, K. and V. Schneider (eds) (2000) Private Organizations in Global Politics. London: Routledge. Rosenau, J.N. (2003) Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Scholte, J.A. (2000a) 'Global Civil Society', in N. Woods (ed.), The Political Economy of Globalization. London: Macmillan, pp. 173–201. Scholte, J.A. (2000b) Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave, first edn. Scholte, J.A. (2002) Civil Society Voices and the International Monetary Fund. Ottawa: North-South Institute. Scholte, J.A. (2003) Democratizing the Global Economy: The Role of Civil Society. Coventry: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, available at www.csgr.org. Scholte, J.A (2004) ‘The WTO and Civil Society’, in B. Hocking and S. McGuire (eds), Trade Politics. London: Routledge, second edn, pp. 146-61. Scholte, J.A. (2005) Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, second edn. Scholte, J.A. (2006) ‘Political Parties and the Democratisation of Globalisation’, in P. Burnell (ed.), Globalising Democracy: Party Politics in Emerging Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 46-68. Scholte, J.A. (2007) ‘Looking to the Future: A Global Civil Society Forum?’ in J.W. Walker and A.S. Thompson (eds), The Emergence of Global Civil Society. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press. Scholte, J.A. (forthcoming) Civil Society and Global Democracy. Cambridge: Polity. Scholte, J.A. with A. Schnabel (eds) (2002) Civil Society and Global Finance. London: Routledge. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: Norton. Weisband, E. and A. Ebrahim (2007) ‘Forging Global Accountabilities’, in Ebrahim and Weisband (eds), Global Accountabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-38. Willetts, P. (ed.) (1996) ‘Conscience of the World’: The Influence of Non- Governmental Organizations on the UN System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Wiseman, G. (1999) ‘“Polylateralism” and New Modes of Global Dialogue’, Leicester Diplomatic Studies Programme, Discussion Paper No. 59. Zürn, M. (2005) ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems’, in D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds), Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 136-63.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1885

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us