Globalisation and rural development in Africa: the case of the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline
Sikod, Fondo (2006) Globalisation and rural development in Africa: the case of the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Sikod_wp20306.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
The process of globalisation is multifaceted. One is smiling and promising, the other looks less attractive, if not threatening. It is the process of growing interdependence of countries worldwide through the increasing volume of cross-border transactions in goods and services and of capital flows, and also through the more rapid and widespread diffusion of technology (The International Monetary Fund, 2001). It is bringing new ways of life and opportunities to the door steps of people in just about all parts of the world. The benefits of the process can be very uneven, with the strong getting stronger and the weak becoming weaker. Marginal groups such as women, the poor and the rural can be particularly affected, with little expectations for social and economic equality. Globalisation, as understood today, feeds on knowledge. Probably the most important source of inequality is the knowledge gap. This paper is about the Chad-Cameroon Petroleum Development and Pipeline Project. This is a 3.7 billion US dollars, 1070 km pipeline project constructed to transport crude oil from fields in southwestern Chad to Kribi on the Atlantic coast of Cameroon. The project is owned by a consortium of trans-national oil companies: Exxon-Mobil, Petronas of Malaysia, and Chevron of the United States. This is the largest foreign direct investment in Sub-Sahara Africa so far. The main message of the paper is that because of the knowledge gap, the rural communities and the poor tend to be excluded from globalisation. This was confirmed in the Chad-Cameroon pipeline project. The rural communities did not benefit either from employment or from compensations for their crops and property destroyed. This was because they did not have enough knowledge and skills to get more. Thus, the project confirmed what literature on globalisation says: the rich get richer and the poor, poorer. The project has come and gone, leaving behind mostly bitter feelings on the part of the rural communities affected. There has been very little, if any improvement in the lives of the people. They feel mostly violated and abused, especially as there were surges in alcoholism, prostitution, and some drug use, whenever the construction activities were within any village. Globalization can be brutal, especially if the receiving community is not fully prepared to accommodate changes. This was the case of the rural communities where the pipeline passed. They knew it was coming, but they were not ready for it. The outcome has not had the anticipated developmental effect.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||J Political Science > JZ International relations
T Technology > TN Mining engineering. Metallurgy
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Petroleum pipelines -- Africa, Central, Globalization -- Economic conditions, Compensation (Law), Rural development -- Africa, Central, Information asymmetry, Africa, Central -- Economic conditions|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||22|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Chad-Cameroon Export Pipeline Project. WSJV Policy. Revised: 15/07/2002 Esso Exploration and Production Chad Inc. 2003. Chad/Cameroon Develoopment Report. Report No. 10. First Quarter. Friends of the Earth I/CED. (2002) Traversing Peoples Lives: how the World Bank finances Community disruption in Cameroon. Cameroon: FoEI/CED. (September 2002. Commonwealth Secretariat. (2003). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, practices and perspectives. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. Drucker, Peter. 1994. The Age of Social Transformation. Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 274, No. 5, pp 53-80. Ellwood, Wayne. (2003). The No-Nonesense Guide to Globalisation. London:Verso. Endeley, Joyce B. and Fondo Sikod 2005. The Impact of the Chad – Cameroon Oil Pipeline Operations on Gender Relations, Land Resources and Community Livelihood. University of Buea. Unpublished Document. Guyer, J. I. (2002) “Briefing: The Chad-Cameroon Petroleum and Pipeline Development project.” In African Affairs: The Journal of the Royal African Society. Volume l0l, N0 402, Jan, pp. 109-115. International Advisory Group. (2001) Report of Field Mission to Chad and Cameroon. November, 14 to 25 2001. Yaounde. Keller-Herzog, A. (1996) Globalisation and Gender – Development Perspectives an Interventions. A paper prepared for Women in Development and Gender Equity Division, Policy Branch Canadian International Development Agency. McGrew, Anthony. (2000). Sustainable Globalization and the Global Politics of Development and Exclusion in the New World Order. In Tim Allen and Alan Thomas (editors), Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Naisbitt, John. (1984). Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. Warner Books. New York. Nelson, J. et al. (2001) Forest People Project: Report on a Consultation with Bagyeli Pygmy Communities impacted by the Chad-Cameroon oil-pipeline project. May 2001. FPP. Oakley, P. et al. (1991) Projects with People: The Practice of Participation in Rural Development. Geneva: International Labour Office. Pearson, R. (2000) “Moving the goal posts: Gender and Globalisation in the Twenty-First Century”. Gender and Development. Vol. 8, N0 1. Porter, M. and Trotz, A. (2002) Introduction to “Gender, Globalisation and Development”. In Atlantis: A Women’s Studies Journal, Volume 26.2, Spring/Summer. Rajaee, F. (2000) Globalisation on Trail: The Human Conditions and the Information Civilisation. Kumarian Press Inc., Canada. Sen. Amartya. (1999). DEVELOPMENT As FREEDOM. London: Oxford University Press Verzola, Roberto. 1998. Globalization: The Third Wave. Paper presented at the International Conference on Colonialism To Globalization: Five Centuries After Vasco da Gama. Indian Social Institute, New Delhi. Feb. 2-6, 1998. Watts, M. (1997) Black Gold, White Heat. State Violence, Local Resistance and the National Question in Nigeria. In Geography of Resistance, Pile, S. and Keith, M. (eds). Routledge, London.|
Actions (login required)