Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Civil society in trade policy-making in Latin America: the case of the environmental movement

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Newell, Peter (Peter John) (2006) Civil society in trade policy-making in Latin America: the case of the environmental movement. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Newell_wp20106.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (260Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

In recent years, and particularly perhaps since the ‘battle of Seattle’ in 1999, the issue of civil society participation in trade policy has attracted increasing policy and academic attention. Much of this attention has been drawn to the question of institutional access and channels of participation and representation within the WTO. The challenge is one that has faced other global institutions such as the World Bank and IMF for a number of years (O’Brien et al 2000). Improving the transparency of and access to decision-making in the context of up-scaling civil society participation is not exclusively a global challenge, however. There has been a great deal of activity at the regional level around trade negotiations and increasingly in Latin America with the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) following in the wake of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and Mercosur (Mercado Común del Sur). Few institutional reforms have been brought about without significant pressure from civil society, however. Some challenges are common to all movements attempting to participate and make their voice heard in the sensitive and traditionally closed arena of trade negotiations. But others are unique, and reflect distinct regional political histories, previous experiences of mobilisation and prevailing social and material realities. Given this, it becomes important to understand what can be learned from the experience of a globally significant region like Latin America about the possibilities and limitations of civil society participation in trade policy. By comparing the documented experiences of NAFTA with analysis of Mercosur and the evolving FTAA negotiations, in terms of the participation of the environmental movements, important insights may be gained about: who is participating in trade policy, how and with what effect and, equally importantly, who is not participating and what are the implications of this? The analysis will therefore attempt to identify key factors which shape these dynamics. These include; * key strategic issues within the movements and among groups themselves (diversity of strategies, politics of coalition-building, patterns of influence and engagement/non-engagement) * the organisation of institutional access (rights, representation, process, decision-making) * key economic and political regional dynamics which affect each of the above (differences between and within individual countries regarding key issues and attitudes towards participation) By comparing across different sets of trade negotiations and institutional arrangements it will be possible to identify what the key drivers and shapers of change appear to be. In other words, the extent to which these appear to derive from the nature of the institution or process itself, the strategies of the movement engaging with it, or more likely still, some combination of both these elements. The challenge is to account for diverse forms of engagement and non-engagement and, more importantly, to derive lessons from them about the possibility of constructing more effective, sustainable and transparent mechanisms of participation and representation in trade policy based on experiences to date in Latin America.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Civil society, Commercial policy, International trade, Environmentalism -- Economic aspects, Latin America -- Economic conditions -- 1982-
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: April 2006
Number: No.201
Number of Pages: 58
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Agüero, Raquel (2002) ‘Environmental legislation in Mercosur’ in 1st Conference on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement in Latin America: Proceedings May 28th and 29th Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: FARN, pp. 113-121. Alanis-Ortega, Gustavo and Ana Karina González-Lutzenkirchen (2002) ‘No room for the environment: The NAFTA negotiations and the Mexican perspective on trade and environment’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 41-61. Albán, María Amparo (2003) ‘Sociedad civil: Tras un derecho a participar en la ALCA’ La Ley: Suplemento de Derecho Ambiental. Julio 14 Buenos Aires, p.7. ALCA (2004) http://www.alca-ftaa.org/English Version/view.htm Almeyra, Guillermo (2004) La protesta social en la Argentina (1990-2004) Buenos Aires: Ediciones Continente. Ambientalismo No Brasil: Pasado, Presente e Futuro (Instituto Socioambiental/Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do estado de Sao Paulo). Reportaje de semanario 12th September 1996, Sao Paulo. Sao Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental Araya, Mónica (Ed) (2000) Comercio y Ambiente: Temas para Avanzar el Diálogo Organización de los Estados Americanos. Araya, Mónica (2001) ‘El rechazo del tema ambiental en el ALCA: Una taxonomia’ Foreign Affairs en espanol, May (http://www.tradepobservatory.org/library.cfm?refID=24967) Downloaded: 2/8/04. Arts,B. (1998) The Political Influence of Global NGOs: Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions Utrecht: International Books. Audley (1997) Green Politics and Global Trade: NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Auyero, Javier (2003) ‘Entre la ruta y el barrio. La experiencia de la organizaciones Piqueteras’ Politica y Gestión Vol.5 Sante Fe, Argentina, pp. 165-169. Alvarez, Sonia,E. Evelina Dagnino and Arturo Escobar (1998) (Eds) Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-envisioning Latin American Social Movements Boulder Co: Westview. Arach, Omar (2003) ‘Ambientalismo, desarrollo y transnacionalidad: las protestas sociales en torno a la represa de Yacyretá’ in Jelin, Elisabeth (ed) Mas alla de la nacion: las escalas multiples de los movimentos sociales Buenos Aires: Libros de Zorzal, pp. 105-161. Aravena, Francisco Rojas y Coral Pey (2003) ‘La sociedad civil en el proceso de integración comercial: El caso Chileno’ in Tussie,D. y Botto,M. (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada?, pp.215-237. Blum, Jonathan (2000) ‘The FTAA and the fast track to forgetting the environment: A comparison of the NAFTA and Mercosur environmental models as examples for the hemisphere’ Texas International Law Journal (Austin) Summer Vol. 35 Issue 3 pp. 435-58 (available online http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl pp. 1-33). Bombal, Inés González (2003) (Ed) Respuestas de la sociedad civil a la emergencia social Buenos Aires: CEDES. Bombal, Inés González (2003) (Ed) Nuevos movimientos sociales y ONGs en la Argentina de la crisis Buenos Aires: CEDES. Botelho, Antontio José Junquiera (2003) ‘La sociedad civil en el proceso de integración comerical: El caso Brasileño’ in Tussie,D. y Botto,M. (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada?, pp. 171-193. Botto, Mercedes and Diana Tussie (2003) ‘Introducción. La internacionalización de la agenda de participación: El debate regional’ in Tussie, Diana y Botto, Merceded (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada? Buenos Aires: Biblos, Pp.27-47. Botto, Mercedes (2003) ‘Mitos y realidades de la participación no gubernamental’ in Tussie, Diana y Botto, Merceded (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada? Buenos Aires: Biblos, pp.237-261. Brock, Karen and McGee, Rosemary (2004) ‘Mapping trade policy: Understanding the challenges of civil society participation’ IDS Working Paper 225 Brighton: IDS. Brown, D.L. and Fox, J., (2001), ‘Transnational civil society coalitions and the World Bank: Lessons from project and policy influence campaigns’ in Edwards, M. and Gaventa, J., (eds.), Global Citizen Action Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press, pp.43-59. Carranza,M. (2003) ‘Can Mercosur survive? Domestic and international constraints on Mercosur? Latin American Politics and Society Vol. 45 No.2 Cavanagh, John. Anderson, Sarah and Hansen-Kuhn, Karen (2001) ‘Cross-border organising around alternatives to free trade: Lessons from the NAFTA/FTAA experience’ in Edwards, Michael and Gaventa, John (eds) Global Citizen Action Boulder Co: Lynne Rienner, pp.149-163. CEDEA (Centro de Estudios Ambientales) (ud) ‘La dimensión socio-ambiental del acuerdo de Asociación Mercosur-Unión Europea: Argentina’. Buenos Aires: CEDEA. Caldwell, Douglas Jake (2002) ‘Civil society and the environment: An environmentalist’s agenda for sustainable trade and investment in the Americas’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 291-307. Casaburi, Gabriel y Laura Zalazar (2001) ‘Las negociaciones del acuerdo de libre comercio de las Américas (ALCA). Las modalidades de participación e inclusión de la sociedad civil’ SerieBrief Cumbres de las Americas, Brief 4 Abril Buenos Aires: FLACSO Argentina. CEDA (Centro Ecuatorio de Derecho Ambiental) (2002) ‘Hacia la participación de la sociedad civil en las Americas’. Memorias de los talleres sobre comerico y ambiente en la reunión ministerial del ALCA’ Quito Octubre 29 y 30, pp.62-75. CIECA (Centro de Investigación Económica para el Caribe) (2003) ‘ALCA y la participación de la sociedad civil’ Blanco, Hernán, Mónica Araya y Carlos Murillo (Eds) ALCA y medio ambiente: Ideas desde Latinoamérica Santiago Chile: CIPMA-GETS-CINPE, pp.333-353. Commission on Sustainable Development (1995) ‘Trade, environment and sustainable development: Report of the General Secretary’ 3rd session 11-28th April 1995 (E/CN.17/1995/12), UN Economic and Social Council. Conca, K. (2000) ‘The WTO and the undermining of global environmental governance’ Review of International Political Economy Vol. 7 No. 3, Autumn, pp.484-94. Curtis, Mark (2001) Trade for Life: Making Trade Work for Poor People London: Christian Aid. Chiriboga, M., (2001), ‘Constructing a southern constituency for global advocacy: The experience of Latin American NGOs and the World Bank’ in Edwards, M. and Gaventa, J., (eds.) Global Citizen Action Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press, pp.73-87. Clarín (2004) ‘Lula dice que el Foro Social ahora es una ‘feria ideológica’’ 28th October, p.27. Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press. Devia, Leila (2002) ‘La sustenabilidad y los procesos de integración: Mercosur, NAFTA y ALCA’ LexisNexis: Jurisprudencia Argentina JA 2002-111 Fasículo No.2 Julio 10. Número especial: Derecho Ambiental Buenos Aires, pp. 29-35. Devia, Leila (ed) (1998) Mercosur y medio ambiente 2nd ed Buenos Aires: Ediciones Cuidad Buenos Aires. DfID (2000) White Paper on Globalisation and Development, Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor. London: HMSO. Available at www.globalisation.gov.uk/ Dore, Elizabeth (1995) ‘Latin America and the social ecology of capitalism’ in Halebsky, Sandor. and Harris, Richard.L. (eds) Capital, Power and Inequality in Latin America Boulder Co: Westview Press, pp. 253-279. Diegues, Antonio.C. (1998) ‘Social movements and the remaking of the commons in the Brazilian Amazon’ in Goldmann, Michael (ed) Privatizing Nature: Political Struggles for the Global Commons London: Pluto Press, pp. 54-76. Das, Bhagirath (2000) ‘Why the WTO decision-making system of ‘consensus’ works against the South’ Third World Resurgence Issue No. 108-109 January. Penang Malaysia: Third World Network. Eckstein, Susan.E. and Wickham-Crowley, Timothy (2003) Struggles for Social Right in Latin America London: Routledge. Eckstein, Susan.E. (1989) (ed) Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements London and California: University of California Press. Edelman, Marc (1999) Peasants against Globalisation: Rural social movements in Costa Rica Stanford: Stanford University Press. Escobar, Arturo and Sonia E. Alvarez (1992) (Eds) The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy and Democracy Boulder Co: Westview. FARN (Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (1997) ‘Hacia regulaciones ambientales armonizadas para las inversiones privadas en grandes proyectos de infrastructura en el Mercosur’ Buenos Aires: FARN. Fisher, Richard (2002) ‘Trade and environment in the FTAA: Learning from the NAFTA’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 183-201. Friedman, Elisabeth, Jay. Hochstetler, Kathryn. Clark, Ann Marie (2001) ‘Sovereign limits and regional opportunities for global civil society in Latin America’ Latin American Research Review Vol. 36 No.3, pp. 7-37. Gaines, Sanford (2002) ‘The Free Trade of the Americas: Lessons from North America’ in The Greening of Trade Law: International Trade Organisations and Environmental Issues ed R.H. Steinberg Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 189-220. Gitli, Eduardo and Murillo, Carlos (2000) ‘Factores que desalientan la introducción del tema ambiental en las negociaciones comerciales: ALCA y una agenda positiva’ in Araya, Mónica (Ed) Comercio y Ambiente: Temas para Avanzar el Diálogo Organización de los Estados Americanos, pp. 149-181. Gitli, Eduardo and Murillo, Carlos (2002) ‘A Latin American agenda for a trade and environment link in the FTAA’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, 273-291. Global Exchange (ud) ‘Top ten reasons to oppose the Free Trade of the Americas’ (http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/ftaa/topten.html) Downloaded: 2/8/04 California: San Francisco Gudynas, Eduardo (1998) ‘Mercosur y medio ambiente en Uruguay’ in Mercosur y Medio Ambiente (ed) H. Blanco and N. Borregaard. Santiago: Chile: CIPMA, pp. 130-42. Gudynas, Eduardo (2001) ‘The re-launching of South American integration and sustainable development’ Pensamiento Propio, No.13: 91-102, June. Managua. Gudynas, Eduardo (1998) ‘Ecologia y participación ciudadana en los acuerdos comerciales: La situación en el Mercosur’, paper, Seminario de Comercio Exterior, Medio Ambiente y Desarollo Sustenable dentro del Mercosur, Punta del Este 10-12 September, 1998. Guimarâes, Roberto P. (1995) The EcoPolitics of Development in the Third World: Politics and Environment in Brazil Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Guiñazú, María Clelia (2003) ‘La sociedad civil en el proceso de integración comerical: El caso Argentino’ in Tussie,D. y Botto,M. (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada?, pp. 145-171. Haber, Lawrence, Paul (1997) ‘Social movements and socio-political change in Latin America’ Current Sociology January Vol. 45 No.1 pp.121-140. Haynes, Jeff (1999) ‘Power, politics and environmental movements in the third world’ in Rootes, C. (Ed) Environmental Movements: Local, National and Global London: Frank Cass, pp. 222-243. Hellman, Judith,A. (1995) ‘The riddle of new social movements: Who they are and what they do’ in Halebsky, Sandor. and Harris, Richard.L. (eds) Capital, Power and Inequality in Latin America Boulder Co: Westview Press, pp. 165-185. Hochstetler, Kathryn (2002) ‘After the boomerang: Environmental movements and politics in La Plata River Basin’ Global Environmental Politics Vol.2 No.4: pp. 35-57. Hochstetler, K. (2003) ‘Fading green? Environmental politics in the Mercosur Free Trade Agreement’ Latin American Politics and Society Vol. 45 No.4 Winter, pp.1-33. Hochstetler, Kathyrn (2003) ‘Mercosur, ciudadania y ambientalismo’ in Jelin, Elisabeth (ed) Mas alla de la nacion: las escalas multiples de los movimentos sociales Buenos Aires: Libros de Zorzal pp.203-245. Hogenboom, Barbara (1998) Mexico and the NAFTA Environment Debate, Utrecht: International Books. Jacobs, Jamie Elizabeth (2002) ‘Community participation, the environment and democracy: Brazil in comparative perspective’ Latin American Politics and Society Winter Vol. 44 No.4 pp.59-89. Jelin, Elizabeth (2003) Mas alla de la nacion: las escalas multiples de los movimentos sociales Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal Johnson, Pierre Marc and André Beaulieu (1996) The Environment and NAFTA: Understanding and Implementing the New Continental Law Washington DC: Island Press. Kearney, Michael and Varese, Stefano (1995) ‘Latin America’s indigenous peoples: Changing identities and forms of resistance’ in Halebsky, Sandor. and Harris, Richard.L. (eds) Capital, Power and Inequality in Latin America Boulder Co: Westview Press. pp.207-233. Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics Itacha and London: Cornell University Press. Korovkin, Tanya (2001) ‘Reinventing the communal tradition: Indigenous peoples, civil society and democratization in Andean Ecuador’ Latin American Research Review, Vol. 36 No.3, pp. 37-69. Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio y Smith, William (2003) ‘Redes transnacionales de la sociedad civil: Entre la protesta y la colaboración’ in Tussie,D. y Botto,M. (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada? pp.47-77. Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio and William Smith (2001) ‘Protest and collaboration: Transnational civil society networks and the politics of summitry and free trade in the Americas’ North-South agenda paper no.51 Coral Gables: North-South Center, University of Miami. Leis, Héctor R (1999 [check]) ‘A model for environmental negotiation in Brazil’ in Clovis Cavalcanti The Environment, Sustainable Development and Public Policies: Building Sustainability in Brazil London: Edward Elgar Leis, Héctor Ricardo and Eduardo Viola (ud) Subsidiariedade e Mercosul Lipschultz, R., with Mayer, J., (1996), Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance: The Politics of Nature from People to Planet, Albany: State University of New York Press Mayer, Fredrick.W (2002) ‘Negotiating the NAFTA: Political lessons for the FTAA’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 97-119. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John.D Zald, Mayer (1996) (Eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings New York: Cambridge University Press. Matus, Mario and Edda Rossi (2002) ‘Trade and environment in the FTAA: A Chilean perspective’ in Deere, Carolyn L. and Daniel Esty (eds) (2002) Greening the Americas: NAFTA’s lessons for hemispheric trade Cambridge: MIT press, pp. 259-273. Mello, Fátima V., Schlesinger, Sergio, Gonçalves Reinaldo (2000) ALCA e meio ambiente Rio de Janeiro: FASE. Mendoza, M.R. et al. (eds.) (1999) Trade Rules in the Making: Challenges in Regional and Multilateral Negotiations, Organisation of American States, Brookings Institution Press: Washington D.C. Natal, Alejandro y Tonatiuh González (2003) ‘La sociedad civil en el proceso de integración comercial: El caso Mexicano’ in Tussie,D. y Botto,M. (Eds) El ALCA y las cumbres de las Americas: Una nueva relacion publico-privada?, pp.193-215. Nauman, Talli (2004) ‘The environmental right to know movement: Organised civil society in the Americas’ IRC (Silver City: Interhemispheric Resource Centre) Americas Program discussion paper, March 24th (http://www.americaspolicy.org/articles/2004/0403rtk_body.html) Nelson, Paul (2001) ‘Information, location and legitimacy: The changing bases of civil society involvement in international economic policy’ in Edwards, M. and Gaventa, J., (eds.), Global Citizen Action Boulder: Lynne Rienner Press, pp.59-72. Newell, Peter (2000) Climate for Change: Non-State Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse Cambridge University Press. Newell,P. (2005) ‘The Political Economy of International Trade a
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1904

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us