Can labour market rigidity lead to economic efficiency? The technical change link
Grimalda, Gianluca (2005) Can labour market rigidity lead to economic efficiency? The technical change link. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
WRAP_Grimalda_wp18605.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
The extent to which labour market rigidity can be beneficial for an economy is investigated in a model where technological change is non-general purpose and different types of skills are available to workers. More precisely, specific skills lock a worker into a particular technology but increases productivity. Conversely, general skills allow workers to move across technologies at the cost of lesser productivity. Labour market rigidity is modelled as cross-sectors transfer costs for general skill workers. The main result is that a positive level of labour market rigidity is in general beneficial for the economy. In fact, ex post efficiency calls for low market rigidity, as this allows more workers to transfer to the innovating sector of the economy. Conversely, ex ante efficiency calls for high labour market rigidity, as this favours workers’ acquisition of specific skills, which increases output. The combination of these two effects results in an inverse-U shaped relationship between output and labour market rigidity. A necessary condition for this result to hold is that the acquisition of specific skills is ex ante costly, as the rent that must be paid in equilibrium to specific skill workers determines a gap in marginal productivity in favour of specific skill labour.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Labor market, Labor mobility, Skilled labor, Human capital, Labor economics|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||29|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Agell, Jonas (1999). “On the Benefits of Rigid Labour Markets: Norms, Market Failures and Social Insurance”, Economic Journal, F143-164 Amable, Bruno and Gatti, Donatella (2004). “Product market competition, job security and aggregate employment”, Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 667-686 Atkinson, A.B. (1999). “The Economic Consequences of Rolling Back the Welfare State”, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Becker, Gary (1964). Human Capital, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press Bentolila, S., and Bertola, G., (1990). “Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Eurosclerosis?”, Review of Economic Studies, 57 (3), 381-402. Bertola, Giuseppe, and Ichino, Andrea (1995). “Wage Inequality and Unemployment: United States vs. Europe”, in: Bernanke, Ben and Rotemberg, Julio (eds.). NBER/Macroeconomics Annual, 10 (1), 13-54. Blanchard, Oliver, and Summers, L.H. (1987). “Hysteresis in Unemployment”, European Economic Review , 31, 288-95 Blanchard, Olivier, and Wolfers, Justin (2000). “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: the Aggregate Evidence”, Economic Journal, 110, 1-33 Chari, V, and Hopenayn, Hugo (1991). “Vintage Human Capital”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, 1142-1165 Collier, Paul and Dollar, David (2002). “Globalization, growth, and poverty: building an inclusive world economy”. Washington, DC : World Bank ; New York, N.Y. : Oxford University Press Dosi, G. (1988), “Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovations”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, pp. 1120-71 Gottschalk, Peter and Moffitt, Robert (1994). “The Growth of Earnings Instability in the U.S. Labor Market” Brooking P apers Econ. Activity, 2, 217-54 Jovanovic, Boyan and Nyarko, Yaw (1996). “Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology”, Econometrica, 64(6), 1299 -1310 Layard, R., Nickell, S., Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press Layard, Richard, and Nickell, Stephen (1998). “Labour Market Institutions and Economic Performance”, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper 0407 Ljungqvist , Lars and Sargent, Thomas (1998). “The European Unemployment Dilemma”, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 514 -550. Ljungqvist , Lars and Sargent, Thomas (2002). “The European Employment Experience”, CEPR Discussion Paper N. 3543 OECD (1997), Employment Outlook, Paris: OECD OECD (1999). Employment Outlook, Paris OECD Jobs Study (1994). Part II, Table 6.7, Col. 5. Country ranking with 20 as the most strictly regulated. Refers to 1990. Parente Stephen, (1994). “Technology Adoption, Learning-by-Doing, and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Theory, 63 (2), 346 -369 Petit, Pascal, and Soete, Luc (eds.) (2001). Technology and the Future of European Employment, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Rigolini, J., (2004). The Political Economy of the Informal Sector, mimeo Rodrik, Dani (1997). “Has Globalization Gone too Far?”, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Saint-Paul, Gilles (2000). The political economy of labour market institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press Violante G.L., Howitt P., Aghion P. (2002). General Purpose Technology and Wage Inequality, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 315 -345 Wade, Robert (2003). The Disturbing Rise in Poverty and Inequality: Is It all a ‘Big Lie’?, in: Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (eds.) (2003). “Taming Globalization”, Cambridge: Polity Press Wasmer, Etienne (2002). “Interpreting Europe and US Labour Markets Differences: The Specificity of Human Capital Investments”, IZA Discussion Paper Series N. 549 World Bank (2005). World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate For Everyone, New York: World Bank and Oxford University Press|
Actions (login required)