Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

LESS BETTER THAN THE REST - PERCEPTIONS OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC SPECIAL NEEDS UNIT

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1995) LESS BETTER THAN THE REST - PERCEPTIONS OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC SPECIAL NEEDS UNIT. EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 47 (3). pp. 263-274. ISSN 0013-1911

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

As a result of provisions under the Education Act 1993 (see Circular no. 4, December 1993), LEAs are to be required to assess and establish the status and funding of their special unit provision. A spectrum of unit provision already exists, sewing a range of purposes and being funded and constituted in a number of ways. The focus of this article is on those units currently described as 'free standing'. These units are located on mainstream sites, possibly sharing school buildings, but operate autonomously. This article analyses the experiences of pupils in a 'free standing' unit who were statemented under the 1981 (now 1993) Act owing predominantly to emotional and behavioural difficulties. The unit was located in a comprehensive school to promote educational and social integration between pupils in the mainstream and the unit. Analyses of observational and pupil interview data revealed that integrative policies became subverted by a complex process of labelling and stereotypification of Pupils allocated unit placements. Paradoxically, the unit, rather than promoting integration, foster-ed the marginalisation of its pupils. Aspects of the model used in this case study may prove helpful to practitioners and policy makers who wish to consider the developing roles of their units in the light of proposed legislation. In engaging with the debate about effectiveness of ir?integration it will be argued that the children themselves need to play an active role in the evaluation process.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education
Journal or Publication Title: EDUCATIONAL REVIEW
Publisher: CARFAX PUBL CO
ISSN: 0013-1911
Date: November 1995
Volume: 47
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 12
Page Range: pp. 263-274
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/19294

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us