A game-theoretic framework to study the influence of globalisation on social norms of co-operation
Grimalda, Gianluca (2004) A game-theoretic framework to study the influence of globalisation on social norms of co-operation. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Grimalda_wp15104.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
A game-theoretic framework is developed to study the evolution of social norms in a society. The two main theoretical assumptions underpinning the model are, first, that agents have some kind of “social” preferences, in addition to standard “self-interested” preferences. Second, individuals modify their behaviour over time in accordance to the “imitation of the most successful agent” paradigm. A stylised model of social interactions is developed, along with concepts of static and dynamic equilibria. After social preferences are specified in accordance with the normative expectation theory, an analysis of the type of equilibria in public goods interactions is provided. Finally, the impact on co-operation of a change in a society’s modes of behaviour, which may be seen as a result of migration or the impact of global communication media, is studied.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Game theory, Globalization -- Economic aspects, Cooperation, Social norms|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||40|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||- Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books - Barth, F. (1995). Ethnicity and the Concept of Culture, Harvard: Harvard University Press - Ben Ner, A. and L. Putternam (eds.) (1998), Economics, Values, and Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-69. - Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. (2001): “Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity – Evidence and Economic Applications”, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, WP N. 75 - Fershtman, C. and Weiss, Y. (1998). “Why do we care what others think about us?”, in Ben-Ner, A. and Putterman. L. (eds): Economics, Values, and Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133-50 - Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. (1998). The Theory of Learning in Games, Cambridge (MA): MIT Press - Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity, London: Penguin - Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D., and Stacchetti, E. (1989), “Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 1, pp. 60-79 - Grimalda, G. and Sacconi, L. (2005). “The Constitution of the Not-For-Profit Organisation: Reciprocal Conformity to Morality”, Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 16, forthcoming - Hannerz, U. (1992). Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Cultural Organisation of Meaning, New York: Columbia University Press - Hardin, R. (1982). Collective Action, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University - Kandori, M. (1992). “Social norms and Community Enforcement”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, pp. 63 - 80 - Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Le Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R. (2003). Providing Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press - Kolpin, V. (1992): “Equilibrium Refinements in Psychological Games”, Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 4 N. 2, p. 218-228 - Ledyard, J. O. (1995). “Public Goods”, in Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (eds.), (1995). Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 112-194 - Lewis, D. (1969), Convention: A Philosophical study, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. - Messick, David M. and Marilynn B. Brewer (1983) “Solving Social Dilemmas: A Review.” In L. Wheeler and P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, (Vol. 4, pp. 11-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. - Myerson, R; (1991), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press - North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press - Ostrom, Elinor (2003) “Toward a Behavioral Theory Linking Trust, Reciprocity, and Reputation.” Trust & Reciprocity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 19-79. - Pettit, P. (1990). “Virtus Normativa”, Ethics, Vol. 100, pp. 725-755 - Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community, New York: Simon and Schuster - Scholte, J.A. (2000). Globalisation: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke : Macmillan - Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf - Smith, A. (1759): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (reprinted: 1976) - Sugden, R. (1998), “Normative expectations: the simultaneous evolution of institutions and norms”, in Ben- Ner, A. and Putterman, L. (eds): Economics, Values, and Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-100. - Sugden, R. (2000): “The motivating power of expectations”, in J. Nida-Rumelin and W. Spohn, (eds). Rationality, Rules and Structure, Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 103-29 - Taylor, M. (1987). The Possibility of Co-operation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press - Weibull, J. (1995), Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge: Mit Press|
Actions (login required)