Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The economics of special and differential trade regimes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Conconi, Paola and Perroni, Carlo (2004) The economics of special and differential trade regimes. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Conconi_wp14304.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (380Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

We examine the theoretical rationale for the granting of temporary Special and Differential (S&D) treatment to developing countries, both in its protection and market-access components under the WTO agreements. S&D rules constitute the centerpiece of the WTO's strategy for integrating developing countries into the trading system, but have been criticized--both on theoretical and empirical grounds--as being ineffective. We show that seemingly non-reciprocal, limited-duration S&D treatment can be rationalized as a transitional equilibrium feature of a self-enforcing international agreement between a large developed and a small developing country, where the two sides have a joint interest in helping the developing country to overcome a policy commitment problem.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): International trade, Economic development, Commercial treaties, Commercial policy, Developing countries -- Economic conditions
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: July 2004
Number: No.143
Number of Pages: 39
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), European Commission (EC)
References: Amjadi, A., U. Reinke, and A. Yeats (1996). “ Did External Barriers Cause the Marginalization of Sub-Saharan Africa in World Trade?” World Bank Research Working Paper 1586. Bagwell, K., and R. Staiger (1997). “Multilateral Tariff Cooperation During the Formation of Regional Free Trade Areas,” International Economic Review 38, 291-319. Baldwin, R., and F. Robert-Nicoud (2002). “Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers,” NBER Working Paper No. 8756. Bhagwati, J. (1968). “The Theory and Practice of Commercial Policy: Departures from Unified Exchange Rates,” Special Papers in International Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Bond, E., and J-H. Park (2004). “Gradualism in Trade Agreements with Asymmetric Countries,” Review of Economic Studies 69, 379-406. Bora, B., J. Lloyd, and M. Pangestu (2000). “Industrial Policy in the WTO,” The World Economy 23, 543-559. Brainard, S., and T. Verdier (1994). “The Political Economy of Declining Industries: Senescent Industry Collapse Revisited,” Journal of International Economics 42, 221-237. Brown, D. (2000). “ International Labor Standards in the World Trade Organization and the International Labor Organization,” Review of The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 82, 105-112. Brunetti, A., G. Kisunko, and B. Weder (1998). “Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector,” World Bank Economic Review 12, 353-384. Coates, D., and R. Ludema (2001). “A Theory of Trade Policy Leadership,” Journal of Development Economics 65, 1-29. Amjadi, A., U. Reinke, and A. Yeats (1996). “ Did External Barriers Cause the Marginalization of Sub-Saharan Africa in World Trade?” World Bank Research Working Paper 1586. Bagwell, K., and R. Staiger (1997). “Multilateral Tariff Cooperation During the Formation of Regional Free Trade Areas,” International Economic Review 38, 291-319. Baldwin, R., and F. Robert-Nicoud (2002). “Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers,” NBER Working Paper No. 8756. Bhagwati, J. (1968). “The Theory and Practice of Commercial Policy: Departures from Unified Exchange Rates,” Special Papers in International Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Bond, E., and J-H. Park (2004). “Gradualism in Trade Agreements with Asymmetric Countries,” Review of Economic Studies 69, 379-406. Bora, B., J. Lloyd, and M. Pangestu (2000). “Industrial Policy in the WTO,” The World Economy 23, 543-559. Brainard, S., and T. Verdier (1994). “The Political Economy of Declining Industries: Senescent Industry Collapse Revisited,” Journal of International Economics 42, 221-237. Brown, D. (2000). “ International Labor Standards in the World Trade Organization and the International Labor Organization,” Review of The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 82, 105-112. Brunetti, A., G. Kisunko, and B. Weder (1998). “Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector,” World Bank Economic Review 12, 353-384. Coates, D., and R. Ludema (2001). “A Theory of Trade Policy Leadership,” Journal of Development Economics 65, 1-29. Staiger, R., and G. Tabellini (1987). “Discretionary Trade Policy and Excessive Protection,” American Economic Review 77, 823-837. Stevens, C. (2003). “From Doha to Cancun: Special and Differential Treatment,” Institute of Development Studies. Stokey, N. (1989). “Reputation and Time Consistency,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 79, 134-139. Tornell, A. (1991). “Time Inconsistency of Protectionist Programs,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 963-74. Whalley, J. (1999). “Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in the Millennium Round,” The World Economy, 1065-1093. World Bank (2004). “Development and the Doha Agenda,” in Global Economic Prospects 2004. World Trade Organization (1999). “Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: Past and Present,” Background Document prepared for the High Level Symposium on Trade and Development, Geneva, March 17-18. Youssef, H. (2003).“Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in the WTO,” paper presented at the International Conference on “Making Special & Differential Treatment More Effective and Responsive to Development Needs”, Geneva, May 6-7.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1971

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us