Multilalteralism and the limits of global governance
Higgott, Richard A. (2004) Multilalteralism and the limits of global governance. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Higgott_wp13404.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
Global governance (GG) is an over-used and under-specified concept. The search for meaningful use is a reflection of the growing despair over the mismatch between the over-development of the global economy and the under-development of a comparable global polity. For the global policy community, driven largely by economic theory, the delivery of public goods via collective action problem solving leads to what I call GG Type I. By contrast, scholarly interest, driven by normative (often cosmopolitan) political theory and focussing on issues of institutional accountability, greater citizen representation, justice and the search for an as yet to be defined global agora leads to a rather loose GG Type II. But, using the IMF and the GATT-WTO as case studies, the paper argues that without the enhancement of GG Type II, the prospects of the continuance of GG Type I—via the economic multilateralism of the 20th century Bretton Woods Institutions (IMF and WB), the WTO—will become unsustainable. It will do so for at least three reasons. The nature of what constitute ‘public goods’ in the 21st century global economy is strongly contested. Both the ability and political will of the US to play the role of self-binding hegemon, under-writing multilateralism, is problematic to say the least. Resistance amongst the world’s ‘rule takers’ to a hegemonic global order is growing. It is not necessary to accept ’Clash of Civilisation’ style arguments to recognise that this is also, in part at least, an ideological contest with security implications of the kind that have dominated the international agenda in the early years of the 21st century. But, perhaps more importantly, it is also a practical-cum-policy issue over the contested nature of what actually constitute ‘global public goods’ in the 21st century. In this context it is appropriate to ask questions about alternative forms of global governance espoused by advocates of G-20 style activities. The paper concludes with an introductory comparative analysis of this evolving economic initiative and the existing economic institutions.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||International cooperation, Globalization -- Political aspects, International economic relations, United States -- Foreign relations|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||40|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Aksu Esref, and Camilleri, Joseph, (2002) (eds.) Democratising Global Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Bank of International Settlements (2002) 70th Annual Report, Basel, BIS Bayard, Thomas, O. and Elliott, Kimberly Ann (1994) Reciprocity and Retaliation in US Trade Policy, Washington DC: Institute for International Economics. Bergsten, Fred (2004) ‘The G-20 and the World Economy’ Speech to the Deputies of the G- 20, Leipzig, March 4 at www.iie.com/publications/papers/bergsten0304-2.htm -------- and Kock-Weser, Caio (2004) ‘The G-2: A New Conceptual Basis and Operating Modality for Transatlantic Economic Relations’, in Werner Weidenfeld, Caio Koch-Weser, C. Fred Bergsten, Walther Stutzle and John Hamre (eds.) From Alliance to Coalitions: The Future of Transatlantic Relations, Hamburg: Bertlelsmann Foundation. Bhagwati, Jagdish (2001) ‘A Costly Pursuit of Free Trade’, The Financial Times, 6, March, 3. -------- (2002) Free Trade Today, Princeton: Princeton University Press. -------- (2003) ‘The Caravan to Cancun’, The Wall Street Journal, 3 July, 2003: 10. -------- and Panagariya, Arvind (2003) ‘Bilateral Treaties are a Sham’, The Financial Times, 14 July, 13. ------- and Patrick, Hugh (eds) Aggressive Unilateralism: America’s 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Bradford Colin I. and Linn, Johannes F. (2004) ‘Global Economic Govenance at the Crossroads: Replacing rhe G-7 with the G-20’, Policy Briefing 131, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution. Brassett, James and Higgott, Richard (2004) Building the Normative Foundations of a Global Polity, Review of International Studies, 30: 29-55. Brown, Chris, (2002) Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press. Cable, Vincent, (1999) Globalization and Global Governance, London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Commission of the European Communities (2003) The European Union and the United Nations: The Choice of Multilateralism, Brussels, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the Parliament, September 10, COM 526 final. Daalder, Ivo (2003) ‘The End of Atlanticism’, Survival, 45 (2): 142-66. Deiter, Heribert and Richard Higgott (2003) ‘Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation’, Review of International Political Economy, 10 (3) 2003: 430-54. Desker, Barry (2004) ‘East Asia: From Purity to Pragmatism—Changing Attitudes Towards Bilateral and Regional Trading Arrangements’, Pacific Review, 17 (1): 3-26. Drache, Daniel (2001) (ed.) The Market and the Public Domain: Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power, London, Routledge. Drucker, Peter (1996) ‘The Changed World Economy’, Foreign Affairs, 64 (4): 768-91 Edwards, Michael (2001) ‘Introduction’, in Michael Edwards and J. Gaventa, (eds) Global Citizen Action, Boulder CO: Lynn Reinner. Elliott, Kimberly and Hufbauer, Gary (2002) ‘Ambivalent Multilateralism and the Emerging Backlash: The IMF and the WTO’, in Patrick Stewart and Shephard Forman, (2002) (eds) Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner. Ferguson, Niall (2001) The Cash Nexus: Money and Power in the Modern World, 1700-2000, London: Penguin. Foot, Rosemary, MacFarlane, Neil, and Mastanduno, Michael, (2003) ‘Instrumental Unilateralism in US Foreign Policy’ in Foot et. al, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Gaddis, John. L, (1972) The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941-47, New York: Columbia University Press. Germain, Randall (2003) ‘Financial Governance and the Public Sphere: Recent Developments’, Montreal, International Studies Association Convention, March 17, G20, (2001) ‘News release’. Meeting of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, November 16-17, 2001 at G20.Org/News/003-e.html Hall, Rodney Bruce and Biersteker, Thomas J. (2002) (eds.) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haufleur, Virginia. Cutler, Claire and Porter, Tony, (1999) (eds) Private Authority and International Affairs, Albany: State University of New York Press. Heinbecker, Paul (2004) ‘How doe we get there from here?’ Summary, Session II: The G20 at Leader’s Level, Ottawa: IDRC, February 28-9. Held, David, (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity. ------- (2004) ‘From Executive to Cosmopolitan Multilateralism’, in David Held and Daniel Konig Archibugi (eds) Taming Globalisation: Frontiers of Governance, Cambridge: Polity. ------- et al, (2000) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press. ------- and McGrew, Anthony (2002) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity. Hewitt de Alcantara, Cynthia (1999) ‘Uses and Abuses of the Concept of Governance’, International Social Sciences Journal 155, 1999: 105-113. Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy (1999) (eds) Approaches to Global Governance Theory, Albany: State University of New York. Higgott, Richard (1999) ‘Economics, Politics and International Political Economy: The Need for A Balanced Diet in an Era of Globalisation’, New Political Economy, 4 (1): 23-36. -------- (2000) ‘Contested Globalisation: The Changing Context and Normative Challenges’, Review of International Studies, 26, 131-54. -------- (2002) ‘Taming Economics, Emboldening International Relations: The Theory and Practice of International Political Economy in an Era of Globalisation’, in Stephanie Lawson (ed) The New Agenda for International Relations, Cambridge: Polity. ------- (2004a) ‘US Foreign Economic Policy and the “Securitisation” of Globalisation’, International Politics 41, Summer, 2004, in press. ------- (2004b) ‘The Securitisation of US Foreign Economic Policy in East Asia: Bilateralism and Securitisation’, Critical Asian Studies, forthcoming ------- and Phillips, Nicola (2000) ‘Challenging Triumphalism and Convergence: The Limits of Global Liberalisation in Asia and Latin America’, Review of International Studies, 26: 359-379. Hoekman, Bernard and Kostecki, Michel (2001) The Political Economy of the World Trade System: The WTO and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hoffmann, Stanley (2003) American Exceptionalism: The New Version, Harvard University: Weatherhead Centre for Science and International Affairs, 1-17. Hooghe, Lisbert and Gary Marks, (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Houtart, Francois and Polet, Francois (2001) (eds) The Other Davos: The Globalization of Resistance to the World Economic System, London: Zed Books. Howse, Robert and Nicolaidis, Kalypso (2003) ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constituionalization or Subsidiarity, Governance, 16 (1): 73-94. Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (1999) (eds.) Inequality, Globalisation and World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ikenberry, John, G. (1992) ‘A World Economy Restored: Expert Consensus and the Post War Anglo-American Settlement’, International Organisation, 46 (1): 289-321. ------- (2002) ‘Introduction’ in John G. Ikenberry (ed) America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ------- (2003) ‘State Power and the Institutional Bargain: America’s Ambivalent Economic and Security Multilateralism’, in Foot, Rosemary, MacFarlane, Neil and Mastanduno, Michael, (2003) ‘Instrumental Unilateralism in US Foreign Policy’ in Foot et. al, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ------- (2004) ‘The End of the Neo-Conservative Moment’, Survival, 46 (1): 7-22. Jawara, Fatoumata and Kwa, Aileen, (2003) Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of Trade Negotiations, London: Zed Books. Jervis, Robert, (2003) ‘The Compulsive Empire, Foreign Policy, July-August: 83-7. Kagan, Robert (2003) Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Knopf. Kahler, Miles and Lake, David (2004) (eds) Governance in a Global Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kaul, Inge, et al. (1999) Global Public Goods, New York: Oxford University Press for the UNDP. Keohane, Robert O. (1989) International Institutions and State Power, Boulder: Westview Press. ------- (2004) ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, in David Held and Daniel Konig-Archibugi, Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, Cambridge: Polity. Kooiman, Jan (2003) Governing as Governance, London: Sage. Krasner, Stephen, (1999) Sovereignty: Organised Hypocrisy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Krause, Joachim, ‘Multilateralism: Behind European Views’, The Washington Quarterly, 27 (2): 43-59. Langley, Paul (2002) World Financial Orders, London: Routledge. Laroche, Josepha, (2003) (ed) Mondialisation et Governance Mondiale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Latham, (1997) The Liberal Moment: Modernity, Security, and the Making of Postwar International Order, New York: Columbia University Press. Low, Patrick (1993) Trading Free: The GATT and US Trade Policy, New York: Twentieth Century Books. Luck, Edward (2003) ‘American Exceptionalism and International Organisations: Lessons from the 1990s’, in Foot, Rosemary, Neil MacFarlane and Michael Mastanduno, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Martin, Lisa (2004) Multilateral Organisations after the US-Iraq War of 2003, Harvard University, Weatherhead Centre for International Affairs, August: 1-17. Milner, Helen, (1997) Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Moravscik, Andrew (2002) ‘Is There a Democratic Deficit in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis, Government and Opposition, 39 (2): 336-63. Nayyar, Deepak (2002) (ed) Governing Globalization: Issues and Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ougaard, Morten and Richard Higgott (2002) (eds.) Towards a Global Polity? London: Routledge. Page, Sheila, (2003) Developing Countries: Victims or Participants Their Changing Role in International Negotiations, London: Overseas Development Institute. Peet, Richard (2003) Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and the WTO, New York, Zed Books. Pianta, M (2002) ‘The Parallel Summits of Global Civil Society: an Update’, in M. Glasius, M. Kaldor and H, Anheier, (eds) Global Civil Society 2002, Oxford: OUP. Pogge, Thomas (2001) (ed) Global Justice, Oxford: Blackwells. Porter, Tony (2002) ‘The Democratic Deficit in the Institutional Relationships for Regulating Global Finance’. Global Governance, 7 (4) 427-39. Prestowitz, Clyde, (2003) Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions, New York, Basic Books. Rodrik, Daniel (2002) ‘Feasible Globalisations’, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/ ~.drodrik. Rollo, Jim (2003) ‘Reviving the WTO Doha Development Agenda: Eight Modest Proposals’, Lausanne: Evian Group, December, http://www.eviangroup.org/p/369.pdf. Rosenau, James N (2002) ‘Governance in the New Global Order’, in David Held and Anthony McGrew (eds) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press. Ruggie, John, G. (1982) ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Post War International Economic Order,’ International Organisation, 36 (2): Page Nos. (1993) (ed) ‘Multilateralism: the Anatomy of an Institution’, in Ruggie, (ed) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, New York: Columbia University Press. Said, Yahia and Desai, Megnad (2003) ‘Trade and Global Civil Society: The Anti Capitalist Movement Revisited’, Global Civil Society, Oxford: OUP: 59-85. Scholte, Jan Aart (2000) Globalisation: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke, Palgrave. ------- (2003) Democratising the Global Economy: The Role of Civil Society, University of Warwick, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. A Report for the Ford Foundation, at www.csgr.org/ EnglishReport.pdf. Sinclair, Timothy (2004) (ed) Global Governance: Critical Concepts in Political Science. London and New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2004. Slaughter, Anne Marie (2004) A New World Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Spiro, Peter (2000) ‘The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and its False Prophets’, Foreign Affairs, 79 (6): 9-15. Stubbs, Richard (2002) ‘ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?’ Asian Survey, 44 (2): 440-455. Stewart, Patrick (2002) ‘Multilateralism and its Discontents: The Causes and Consequences of US Ambivalence’, in Patrick Stewart and Shepard Forman, (eds) Multilateralism in US Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner. ------ and Forman, Shepard (2002) (eds) Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner. Stiglitz, Joseph (2002) Globalisation and Its Discontents, London: Penguin. Stoker, Gerry (1999) ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Sciences Journal, 155: PAGE Nos. Stone, Diane, (2004) ‘Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the “Transnationalisation” of Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (3): ------- and Maxwell, Simon (2004) (eds.) Global Knowledge Networks and International Development, London: Routledge. Strange, Susan (1996) The Retreat of the State, Cambridge: CUP. Toye, John (2004) ‘Knowledge and International Policy Making’, UNRISD Conference on Social Knowledge, and International Policy Making: Exploring the Linkages, Geneva, 20-21 April. United States Government, (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September. www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html Vatikiotis, Michael and Holland, Tom, (2004) ‘Asian Financial Union: Thinking the Unthinkable’, Far Eastern Economic Review, April 8. Verweij, Marco and Josling, Timothy. (2003) ‘Deliberately Democratizing Multilateral Organization’, Governance, 16 (1): 1-22. Wade, Robert (2004) ‘The Disturbing Rise in Poverty and Inequality: Is it All a Big Lie?’ in David Held and Daniel Konig Archibugi (eds) Taming Globalisation: Frontiers of Governance, Cambridge: Polity. ------- and Frank Veneroso, (1998) ‘The Asian Crisis: High Debt Model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF complex’, New Left Review, 228, March-April: 3-23. Watson, Iain, (2002) Rethinking the Politics of Globalisation: Theory, Concepts and Strategy, Aldershot: Ashgate. Wedgewood, Ruth, (2000) ‘Courting Disaster: The US Takes a Stand’, Foreign Service Journal, 77(3): 34-41. Williamson, John (1990) 'What Washington Means by Policy Reform', in John Williamson (ed) Latin American Adjustment, How Much Has Happened? Washington, Institute for International Economics. Wolf, Martin (2004a) ‘Growth requires painful choices, not platitudes’, The Financial Times, March 3: 13. ------- (2004b) ‘The Case for Globalisation’, The Financial Times, May 8 (CHECK) Woods, Ngaire (2001a) ‘Who should govern the world economy: the challenges of glolbalisation and governance’, Renewal, 9 (2/3): 73-82. ------- (2001b) ‘Making the IMF and the World Bank More Accountable’, International Affairs, 77 (1): 83-100. ------- (2003) ‘The United states and the International Financial Institutions: Power and Influence within the World Bank and the IMF’, in Foot, Rosemary, Neil MacFarlane and Michael Mastanduno, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ------- and Narliker, Amrita (2001) ‘The WTO, the IMF and the World Bank’, Accountable to Whom? International Social Science Journal, 170 (November): Zuckerman, Mortimer (1988) ‘A Second American Century’, Foreign Affairs, 77 (3) 1998: 18-31.|
Actions (login required)