An economic assessment of the accession of the Central and Eastern European countries to the EU single market
Edwards, T. Huw (2004) An economic assessment of the accession of the Central and Eastern European countries to the EU single market. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
WRAP_Edwards_wp12804.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
In 2004 the European Union is due to incorporate 10 new members, mostly from theCentral and Eastern European Countries (CECs). Trade between the EU and CECs currently falls well short of that between EU countries, and if we assume this pattern reflects both tariffs and a resource cost due to regulatory differences, then 1997 trade patterns would imply such costs are 7-15% on trade between the EU and CECs. Elimination/harmonisation of remaining tariffs is likely to bring small welfare gains to new entrants. By contrast entry to the Single Market looks far more significant: after both tariff union and entry to the Single Market total trade volumes between the EU and CECs could rise by 50-100% (much more in some commodities), while welfare gains in the CECs could be of the order of 11.5-20%, larger than the previous two studies have suggested. Welfare gains within the EU are around 0.4% of GDP, with all regions gaining but Germany gaining most. Gains are greater where capital is fully mobile.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||European Economic Community, Equilibrium (Economics), International trade, Economic development -- Europe, Europe -- Economic integration, Europe, Central -- Economic conditions -- 1989-, Europe, Eastern -- Economic conditions -- 1989-|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||29|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||Fifth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP5)|
|References:||Balassa, B. (1964): ‘The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: a Reappraisal’. Journal of Political Economy 72 (Dec 1964) pp 584-596. Baldwin, R.E. and A.J. Venables (1995): ‘Regional Economic Integration’, Paper in Handbook of International Economics (III) pp 1597-1644. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Baldwin, R.E. (2001): paper in Maskus and Wilson (op cit). Baldwin, R.E., Francois, J.F. and Portes, R. (1997): ‘EU enlargement: Small costs for the west, big gains for the east’.Economic Policy April 1997, pp 127-176. Also comments by Rodrik following. Bergstrand, J.H. (1989): ‘The Generalised Gravity Equation: Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory of International Trade’. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 pp 143-153. Brown, D. Deardorff, A., Djankov, S. and Stern, R. (1995): ‘An economic assessment of the integration of Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland into the European Union’.In S.W. Black ‘Europe’s Economy Looks East’ Ch 2. CUP. Deardorff, A. (1998): ‘Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’ In J.A.Frankel (ed): The Regionalization of the World Economy, University of Chicago Press. Edwards, T.Huw (2003)(1): ‘Quality Standards under Classical Oligopoly and Trade: Regulatory Protection of Just Over-Regulation?’ CSGR working paper 126/03 Nov 2003, Warwick UK. Edwards, T.Huw (2003)(2): ‘History Matters for Import Demand: a Match-Searching Model of Inter-Firm Trade’. Mimeo, CSGR Warwick. LeJour, DeMooij and Nahuis (2001): ‘EU Enlargement: Implications for Countries and Industries’. Report CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. McCallum, J. (1995): ‘National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns’, American Economic Review, 85: 615-23. Maskus, K.E. and J.S.Wilson (eds 2001): Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade. Michigan University Press. Chs 1 and 2 by the editors. Moenius, J. (1999): ‘The role of standards in trade’ Mimeo, University of California, San Diego. http://weber.ucsd.edu/~jmoenius/hp/research.htm#Papers Rauch, J.E. (1996): ‘Trade and Search: Social Capital, Sogo Sosha and Spillovers’. NBER Working Paper w 5618. Wallner, K. (1998): ‘Mutual recognition and the Strategic Use of International Standards’. Stockholm School of Economics Discussion paper.|
Actions (login required)