Quality standards under classical oligopoly and trade: regulatory protection or just over-regulation
Edwards, T. Huw (2003) Quality standards under classical oligopoly and trade: regulatory protection or just over-regulation. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_edwards_wp12603.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
Recent trade policy debates have focused increasingly on the supposed barriers caused by di¤ering country regulations, and at proposed remedies such as mutual recognition agreements. There are several motives for setting minimum quality standards in an open economy. This paper examines the motive of correcting an undersupply of quality when an industry is monopolistic, and sets up a theoretical model of regulatory setting of minimum vertical quality standards in a classical two-country cross-hauling duopoly model with identical �rms and consumers. It is shown that, in the absence of cooperation between the two national regulators, there will be a tendency to strategic over-regulation, bene�ting consumers at the expense of �rms compared to the globally optimal solution. This overregulation leads to excessive, rather than inadequate trade. Further, when a mixture of horizontal and vertical quality standards is introduced, the pro�t-shifting incentive noted in previous studies to set horizontal technical barriers to trade which discriminate against foreign suppliers is either greatly reduced or totally eliminated. It is also noted that the commonly-supported policy response to technical barriers to trade, mutual recognition, is not socially optimal as previous studies had indicated, but instead leads to underregulation, with higher-than-optimal company pro�ts and lower consumption and trade.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JX International law
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Trade regulation, Commercial law, Oligopolies, International trade, Foreign trade regulation|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||37|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:|| Akerlof, K. (1970): The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 pp 488-500.  Das, S.P. and S.Donnenfeld (1989): Oligopolistic Competition and International Trade: Quantity and Quality Restrictions. Journal of International Economics Vol 27 (304) pp 299-318.  Fisher, R. and Serra, P. (2000): Standards and Protection. Journal of International Economics Vol 52 Issue 2 pp377-400.  Gandal, N. (2001) Quantifying the Impact of Compatability Standards and Barriers: an Industrial Organisation Perspective.In Maskus and Wilson (op cit).  LeJour, DeMooij and Nahuis (2001): EU Enlargement: Implications for Countries and Industries. Report CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis  Leland, H.E. (1979): Quacks, Lemons and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards. Journal of Political Economy, Vol 87 pp. 1328-1346.  Lutz, S. (1996(1)): Vertical Product Differentiation, Quality Standards and International Trade Policy. CEPR Discussion Paper No 1443, London.  Lutz, S. (1996(2)): Trade Effects of Minimum Quality Standards With and Without Deterred Entry. CEPR Discussion Paper No 1384,London.  Maskus, K.E. and J.S.Wilson (eds 2001): Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade. Michigan University Press. Chs 1 and 2 by the editors.  Mieskowski, P (1989) and Zodrow, G.R. (1989): Taxation and the Tiebout Model: The Differential Effects of Head Taxes, Taxes on Land Rents and Property Taxes: Journal of Economic Literature, V 27 no 3, 1098-1146.  Moenius, J. (1999): The role of standards in trade Mimeo, University of California, San Diego. http://weber.ucsd.edu/~jmoenius/hp/research.htm#Papers  Shaked, A. and J.Sutton (1982): Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation. Review of Economic Studies, Vol 49 pp 3-13.  Sykes, A.O. (1995): Product Standards for Internationally Integrated Goods Markets, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.  Trefler, D. (1995) The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries. American Economic Review 85, 1029-1046.  Wallner, K. (1998): Mutual Recognition and the Strategic Use of International Standards. Stockholm School of Economics Discussion Paper.  World Trade Organisation: Agreement on Technical Barri- ers to Trade. From the Uruguay Round documents available on http : ==www:wto:org=english=docse=legale=finale:htm :|
Actions (login required)