American unilateralism, foreign economic policy and the 'securitisation' of globalisation
Higgott, Richard A. (2003) American unilateralism, foreign economic policy and the 'securitisation' of globalisation. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
WRAP_Higgott_wp12403.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
This paper traces the ‘securitisation’ of US foreign economic policy since the advent of the Bush administration. It does so with reference to US economic policy in East Asia. It argues that in the context of US economic and military preponderance in the world order, the US has been unable to resist the temptation to link foreign economic and security policy. While there was evidence of the securitisation of economic globalisation in US policy from day one of the Bush administration, it was 9/11 that firmed up this trend. For the key members of the Bush foreign policy team, globalisation is now seen not simply in neo-liberal economic terms, but also through the lenses of the national security agenda of the United States. Economic globalisation is now not only a benefit, but also a ‘security problem’. 9/11 offered the opportunity for what we might call the ‘unilateralist-idealists’, in the Bush Administration, to set in train their project for a post-sovereign approach to American foreign policy. The paper identifies some intellectual contradictions in current US strategy and raises a series of questions about the implications for world order of the consolidation of the trends identified in the paper.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||J Political Science > JZ International relations
E History America > E151 United States (General)
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||International economic relations, Security, International -- United States, Sovereignty, United States -- Foreign relations -- East Asia, East Asia -- Foreign relations -- United States|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||42|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Aggarwal, Vinod and Ravenhill, John, (2001) ‘Undermining the WTO: The Case Against Open Sectoralism’, Asia Pacific Issues, February; 1-12. Albert, M. (1992) Capitalism versus Capitalism, London: Whurr. Bhagwati, Jagdish (2001) ‘A Costly Pursuit of Free Trade’, The Financial Times, 6, March, 3. -------- (2002) Free Trade Today, Princeton: Princeton University Press. -------- (2003) ‘The Caravan to Cancun’, The Wall Street Journal, 3 July, 2003: 10. -------- and Panagariya, Arvind (2003) ‘Bilateral Treaties are a Sham’, The Financial Times, 14 July, 13 Berlin, Isaiah (1969) Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brassett, James and Higgott, Richard, (2004) ‘Building the Normative Foundations of a Global Polity’, Review of International Studies, forthcoming. Bush, George, W (2002) ‘Remarks by the President at the 2002 Graduation Exercise of the United States Military Academy’, New York: West Point. www.whitehouse.gov.news/ releases/2002/06/20020601-3.html Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder CO: Lynn Reinner. Dieter, Heribert and Richard Higgott (2003) ‘Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation’, Review of International Political Economy, 10 (3) 2003: 430-54. Desker, Barry (2003) ‘East Asia: From Plurality to Pragmatism—Changing Attitudes Towards Bilateral and Regional Trading Arrangements’, Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Mimeo Dodge, Toby (2003a) Inventing Iraq: The Failure of Nation Building and a History Denied, New York: Columbia University Press. -------- (2003b) ‘US Interventions and Possible Iraqi Futures, Survival, 45 (3): 103-22 Elliott, Kimberly an Hufbauer, Gary (2002) ‘Ambivalent Multilateralism and the Emergin Backlash: The IMF and the WTO’, in Patrick, Stewart and Shephard Forman, (2002) (eds) Multilateralism and US Foerign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner Emmers, Ralph, (2003) ‘ASEAN and the securitization of transnational crime in Southeast Asia’, The Pacific Review, 16 (3): 421-440. Fisher, Matthew and Kreuger, Anne (2003) ‘Building on a Decade of Experience: Crisis Prevention and Resolution’, International Crises: What Follows the Washington Consensus, 6th Annual Conference, ESRC Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Warwick University, July 11-13. Foner, Eric, (1998) The Story of American Freedom, New York: W. W. Norton. Foot, Rosemary, MacFarlane, Neil and Mastanduno, Michael, (2003) ‘Instrumental Unilateralism in US Foreign Policy’ in Foot et. al, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Garten, Jeffrey,(1992) A Cold Peace: America, Japan, Germany and the Struggle for Supremacy, New York: Time Books for the Twentieth Century Fund. Goh, Evelyn, (2002) ‘Hegemonic Constraints: the Implications of September 11 for American Power, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 57 (1): 77-97. Goldfischer, David, (2002) ‘E.H.Carr: A “Historical Realist” approach for the Globalisation Era’, Review of International Studies, 28: 697-717. Gray, John (1996) Liberalism, (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press). ------- (1977) Endgames: Questions in Late Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Polity. Hassner, Pierre and Vaisse, Justin (2003) Washington et le Monde: Dilemmes d’un Superpuissance, Paris: CERI/Autrement. Higgott, Richard (1998) ‘The Asian Financial Crisis: A Case Study in the Politics of Resentment’, New Political Economy, 3 (3): 333-356. ------- (1999) ‘Economics, Politisc and (International) Political Economy: The Case for a Balanced Diet’, New Political Economy, 4(1): 23-36 -------- (2000) ‘Contested Globalisation: The Changing Context and Normative Challenges’, Review of International Studies, 26, 131-54. ------- (2002) ‘Taming Economics, Emboldening International Relations: The Theory and Practice of International Political Economy in an Era of Globalisation’, in Stephanie Lawson (ed) The New Agenda for International Relations, Cambridge: The Polity Press. Hirsch, Fred, (1977) The Social Limits to Growth, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Holsti, Ole and Rosenau, James, N. (1999) ‘Internationalism: Intact or in Trouble?’ in Wittkopf, Eugene and Jones, Christopher (eds) The Future of American Foreign Policy, New York: St Martins Press, Third Edition. Ikenberry, John, G. (2002a) ‘Introduction’ in John G Ikenberry (ed) America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (2002b) ‘America’s Imperial Ambition’, Foreign Affairs, September-October: 44-60 Jervis, Robert, (2003) ‘The Compulsive Empire, Foreign Policy, July-August: 83-7. Kagan, Robert (2003) Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Knopf. Kahler, Miles, (2000) ‘Legalization as a Strategy: The Asia Pacific Case’, International Organisation, 54 (3): 549-71. Kissinger, Henry (2001) Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a New Diplomacy for the 21st Century, New York: Simon and Schuster. Krasner, Stephen (1999) Sovereignty: Organised Hypocrisy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lehmann, Jean Pierre (2003) ‘A Sorry Spectacle: The WTO Trade Negotiations’, The World Today, August September, 27-9. Luck, Edward (2003) ‘American Exceptionalism and International Organisations: Lessons from the 1990s’, in Foot, Rosemary, Neil MacFarlane and Michael Mastanduno, (eds) US Hegemony and International Organisations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mandelbaum, Michael, (2001) Ideas that Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy and Free Markets in the Twenty-First Century Mastanduno, Michael, (1998) ‘Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship’, International Organisation, 52 (4): 825-54. Mead, Walter Russell (2002) Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How it Changed the World, New York: Routledge. Nye, Joseph, Jr (2002) The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go it Alone, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ohmae, Kenichi (1990) The Borderless World, New York: Fontana Patrick, Stewart and Shephard Forman, (2002) (eds) Multilateralism and US Foerign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner Pfaff, William, (2003) ‘The Philosophers of Chaos Reap the Whirl Wind’. International Herald Tribune, 23-4 August, 10. Prestowitz, Clyde, (1988) Trading Places, Washington DC: Economic Strategy Institute. -------- (2003) Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions, New York, Basic Books Ravenhill, John, (2000) ‘APEC Adrift: Implications for Economic Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific’, The Pacific Review, 13 (2): 319-33. Rice, Condoleeza (2000) ‘Promoting the National Interest’, Foreign Affairs, 74 (1): 45-62. Richardson, James, L. (2002) ‘Critical Liberalism in International Relations’, Working Paper, 2002/7, Canberra, Department of International Relations, Australian National University. ------ Contending Theories of Liberalism in World Politics, Ideology and Power, Boulder: CO: Lynn Reinner. Risse, Thomas (2002) ‘US Power in a Liberal Security Community’, in John G Ikenberry, (ed) America Unrivalled: The Future of the Balance of Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Rhodes, Edward, (2003) ‘The Imperial Logic of Bush’s Liberal Agenda, Survival 45 (1) 2003: 131-154. Ruland (2000) ‘ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical Implications and Practical Consequences’, The Pacific Review, 13 (3): 421-51. Peter Schwartz and Peter Leyden, (1977) ‘The Long Boom: A History of the Future, 1980- 2020’, Wired, July. Skidelsky, Robert (2003) ‘The American Contract’, Prospect, July: 30-35. Spero, Joan, (1977), The Politics of International Economic Relations, New York: St Martins Press. Spiro, Peter (2000) ‘The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and its False Prophets’, Foreign Affairs, 79 (6): 9-15. Spruyt, Henryk (1994) The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stiglitz, Joseph (2002) Globalisation and Its Discontents, London: Penguin. Strange, Susan, (1970) ‘International Relations and International Economics: A Case of Mutual Neglect’, International Affairs, 46 (2): 304-315. -------- (1985) ‘The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony’, International Organisation Thurow, Lester (1992) Head to Head: The Coming Battle Among Japan, Europe and America, London: Nicholas Brealey,. United States Government, (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September. www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html Waever, Ole, (1995) ‘Securitisation and Desecuritisation’, in Ronnie D Lipschutz, (ed) On Security, New York: Columbia University Press. Walker, R. B. J. 1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Wallace, William (2002) ‘US Unilateralism: A European Perspective’, in Patrick, Stewart and Shephard Forman, (eds) Multilateralism and US Foerign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement, Boulder, CO: Lynn Reinner Waltz, (1979) Theory of International Politics, Waltham Mass: Addison-Wesley. Wang (2000) ‘The Asian Financial Crisis and its Aftermath: Do We need a Regional Financial Arrangement? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 17 (2) 205-17 Wolfe, Christopher and Hittinger, John (eds) (1994) An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Theory and Its Critics, Lanham MD: Rowman and Littelfield. Zuckerman, Mortimer, (1999) ‘A Second American Century’, Foreign Affairs, 73 (3): 18-31.|
Actions (login required)