Trade and global integration
Das, Dilip K., 1941- (2003) Trade and global integration. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
WRAP_Das_wp12003.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
This paper focuses on the post-war process of creation of a global trading system and integration of world trade. As the former came into being, multilateral trade liberalization became an on-going feature of the global economy facilitating international trade, consequently importance of international trade in the global economy increased dramatically. Since the mid-1980s, mindset of policy makers in the developing economies regarding trade policy began changing in a discernible manner. The high- and middle-income developing economies liberalized their trade policy regimes and tried to integrate with the global economy. Several developing economies were highly successful in integrating with the global economy through trade. The change in the mindset of policy mandarins was clearly visible during the Uruguay Round and the on-going Doha Rounds of multilateral trade negotiations. Although the industrial economies were the primary beneficiaries of the multilateral trade liberalization in the past, for the developing economies trade, particularly trade in manufacturing goods, went on increasing monotonically. The kaleidoscope of global trading system turned several times and international trade has enormously expanded over the preceding half century, which in turn contributed substantially to global integration through trade, albeit in a selective manner.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||International trade, Globalization -- Economic aspects, Liberalism, International economic integration|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||28|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Anderson, K., J. Francois, T. Hertel, B. Hoekman and W. Martin. 2001. Potential Gains from Trade Reforms in the New Millennium”. Washington DC. The World Bank. (Processd). Anderson, J.E. and E. van Wincoop.2001. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle”, Cambridge. MA. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 8079. Revised version available on the Internet at www.virginia.edu./~econ/vanwincoopx.htm. Coe, T.D., A. Subramanian, N.T. Tamirisa. 2002.”The Missing Globalization Puzzle”. Washington DC. International Monetary Fund. Working Paper. WP/02/171. Das, Dilip K. 2001a. Global Trading System at Crossroads: A Post-Seattle Perspective, London and New York. Routledge. Das, Dilip K. 2001b. “Liberalization Efforts in China and Accession to the World Trade Organization”, The Journal of World Investment, Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 761-789. Engel, C. and J.H.Rogers.2001. “Deviations from Purchasing Power Parity: Causes and Welfare Costs”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 55. No. 10. pp. 29-57. Feenstra, R.C.1998. "Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy", Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 12. No. 4. pp. 31-50. Fujita, M., P.R. Krugman and A.J. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regional and International Trade, Cambridge. MA. The MIT Press. Hertel, T. and W. Martin. 2001. "Liberalizing Agriculture and Manufactures in a Millennium Round: Implications for Developing Countries", in B. Hoekman and W. Martin (eds.) Developing Countries and the WTO: A Pro-Active Agenda, Oxford. Basil Blackwell. pp. 110- 142. Hufbauer, G., E. Wada and T.Warren.2002. The Benefits of Price Convergence: Speculative Calculations, Policy Analysis in Economics. Paper No. 65. Washington DC. Institute for International Economics. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2002. World Economic Outlook, October. Washington DC. Krueger, A.O. 2000. "Factors Affecting Export Growth and Performance" in Dilip K. Das (ed.) Asian Exports, Oxford. Oxford University Press. pp. 25-74. Milner, C. and R. Read. 2002. “Introduction: The GATT Uruguay Round, Trade Liberalization and the WTO”, in C. Milner and R. Read (eds.) Trade Liberalization, Competition and the WTO, Cheltenham. UK. Edward Elgar. pp. 1-22. Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff.2001. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There A Common Cause?” Cambridge. MA. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 7777. Parsley, D.C. and S. J. Wei.2001. “Limiting Currency Volatility to Stimulate Goods Market Integration: A Price-Based Approach”, Cambridge. MA. National Bureau of Economic research. NBER Working Paper No. 8468. Rogers, J.H.2002. “Price Level Convergence, Relative Prices, and Inflation in Europe”, Washington DC. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve system. International Finance Discussion Paper No. 699. Rose, A. K.2002. “Estimating Protectionism from the Gravity Model”, Washington DC. International Monetary Fund. (mimeo) Sampson, G.P. 2000. Trade, Environment and the WTO: the Post Seattle Agenda, Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press. Srinivasan, T.N.2002. “Globalization: Is it Good or Bad?” Stanford. CA. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. Economic Policy Brief. December 23. World Development Report (WDR). 2000. Washington DC. Published for The World Bank by Oxford University Press. The World Bank (WB). 2001. Global Economic Prospects and Developing Countries, Washington DC. The World Bank (WB). 2002. Globalization, Growth and Poverty. New York. Oxford University Press. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1999. The Legal Texts: the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001. "Doha WTO Ministerial: Briefing Notes: 52 Years of GATT/WTO" Geneva. Available on the Internet at http://www-heva.wtoministerial. org/english/the wto_e/minist_e/min01_e/brief_e/brief21_e.htm.|
Actions (login required)