Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

REFINING COMMON-SENSE - TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1994) REFINING COMMON-SENSE - TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGEMENT STUDIES. In: 11th EGOS Colloquium on The Production and Diffusion of Managerial and Organizational Knowledge, PARIS, FRANCE, JUL 06, 1992-JUL 08, 1993. Published in: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 31 (6). pp. 761-780. ISSN 0022-2380.

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Drawing on Pepper's World Hypotheses we describe four different approaches to obtaining formal knowledge in management studies. These approaches are: formism, mechanism, contextualism, and organicism. All of them are valid ways of refining common sense that resist synthesis. Applying Pepper's framework in as extremely diverse a field as management studies (focusing on organizational behaviour (OB) and strategic management (SM) in particular) we show the different assumptions and knowledge claims made by different types of theorists in management and, moreover, we shed light on the sources of conceptual rivalry that often characterize the field. By way of illustration, the Mintzberg-Ansoff debate on the nature of strategic management is focused upon for closer examination. It is shown that analysing this debate in terms of Pepper's framework one can understand and evaluate the epistemological differences between Mintzberg and Ansoff, which stem from their adherence to contextualist and mechanistic-cum-formistic types of knowledge respectively.

Item Type: Conference Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Journal or Publication Title: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
Publisher: BLACKWELL PUBL LTD
ISSN: 0022-2380
Official Date: November 1994
Dates:
DateEvent
November 1994UNSPECIFIED
Volume: 31
Number: 6
Number of Pages: 20
Page Range: pp. 761-780
Publication Status: Published
Title of Event: 11th EGOS Colloquium on The Production and Diffusion of Managerial and Organizational Knowledge
Location of Event: PARIS, FRANCE
Date(s) of Event: JUL 06, 1992-JUL 08, 1993

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us