Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Competition in unit vs. ad valorem taxes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Lockwood, Ben (2001) Competition in unit vs. ad valorem taxes. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation).

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Lockwood_wp8601.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (61Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

This note shows that in the Sodrow-Miesowski-Wilson model, the Nash equilibrium in capital taxes depends on whether these taxes are unit (as assumed in the literature) or ad valorem (as in reality). In a symmetric version of the model with cobb-Douglas technology, public good provision is higher, and residents in both countries are better off, when countries compete in unit taxes.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Ad valorem tax, Unit pricing, Competition, International, Taxation -- Mathematical models, Public goods
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: June 2001
Number: No.86/
Number of Pages: 13
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: S. Bucovetsky (1991) “Asymmetric tax competition”, Journal of Urban Economics 30, 67-81 S.Delipalla and M.Keen (1992) “The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition” Journal of Public Economics 28, 127-134 B.Lockwood and K.Wong (2000) ““Specific and Ad Valorem Tariffs are not Equivalent in Trade Wars”, Journal of International Economics, 52, 183-95 B.Lockwood (2001) “Tax competition and coordination with destination and origin principles: a synthesis”, Journal of Public Economics, 81, 279-319 S.E.Skeath and G.A. Trandel (1994) “A Pareto comparison of ad valorem and unit taxes in noncompetitive environments”, Journal of Public Economics, 53, 53-71 D.B.Suits and R.A..Musgrave(1953), “Ad valorem and unit taxes compared”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, 598-604 J.D.Wilson(1986) “A theory of interregional tax competition” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 296-315 J.D.Wilson (1999) “Theories of tax competition” National tax Journal, 52, 269-304 K.Wicksell(1959) “Taxation in the monopoly case”, translated and reprinted in: Musgrave and Shoup, eds, Readings in the Economics of Taxation (Irwin, Homewood, IL)
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2033

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us