Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Grasping at straws: a ratings downgrade for the emerging international financial architecture

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

King, Michael and Sinclair, Timothy J. (2001) Grasping at straws: a ratings downgrade for the emerging international financial architecture. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_King_wp8201.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (240Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

Following the Asia crisis of 1997-98, policymakers invested a great deal of energy in designing a new international financial architecture. However many of the policy proposals which have emerged from think tanks and the multilateral agencies have proven unworkable or politically unpalatable. The debate focuses on state-led initiatives. But the assumption that public policy is by definition an output of public institutions is difficult to sustain in an era of global change. This paper considers specialized forms of intelligence-gathering and judgment-determination which seem increasingly important as sources of governance in this era of financial market volatility. These agents - embedded knowledge networks (EKNs) - include the major bond rating agencies, Moody’s Investors Service and Standard and Poor’s, the focus of this paper. The Basel Committee has put forward a serious proposal to reform the existing capital adequacy framework which uses banks' own internal ratings and external bond ratings to calculate bank risk-weighted capital requirements. The paper shows that there are potentially unexpected consequences from using private rating agencies as a substitute for state-based regulation, due to the organizational incentives that shape the ratings industry. Cementing these organizational incentives into the emerging financial architecture will give rise to negative social and economic consequences.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Bank for International Settlements, Financial crises -- Asia, International finance, Bonds -- Ratings and rankings, Knowledge management, Banks and banking -- Asia, Capital market -- Asia
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: November 2001
Number: No.82/
Number of Pages: 23
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30-September 2, 2001
References: Appell, Doug and G. Pierre Goad, “APEC Leaders Question Sway of Rating Firms – Officials Seek a Review of Agencies’ Practices But Few Expect Change,” Asian Wall Street Journal, November 19, 1998, page 1. Bank for International Settlements. Overview of the New Basel Capital Accord. Basel, Switzerland, January 2001. Bates, Abbe. Standard & Poor’s official, New York. E-mail communication to author. November 13, 2000 Batten, David, John L. Casti and Roland Thord. “Introduction,” in David Batten, John L. Casti and Roland Thord (eds.) Networks in Action: Communication, Economics and Human Knowledge. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995. Cantor, Richard and Frank Packer. "The Credit Rating Industry," Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Volume 19, Number 2, Fall 1994. Chmaj, Andrew. Moody’s Investors Service official, London. E-mail communication to author. July 31, 2000. Cohen, Benjamin J. "Phoenix Risen: The Resurrection of Global Finance," World Politics, Volume 48, Number 2, January 1996, 268-296. Cutler, A. Claire. “Locating ‘Authority’ in the Global Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly, Volume 43, Number 1, 1998, 59-81. Cutler, A. Claire, Virginia Haufler and Tony Porter. "Private Authority and International Affairs," in A.. Claire Cutler, Virginia Haufler and Tony Porter. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999. Economist, The. “Time to Leave: A Survey of World Banking.” May 2, 1992. Economist, The. “Recalled to Life: A Survey of International Banking.”April 30, 1994. Economist, The. “Risks Beyond Measure.” December 13, 1997, 68. Edwards, Ben “Will the Agencies be SEC Puppets?” Euromoney, November 1994, 26-27. Everling Advisory Services. List of Rating Agencies. www.everling.de. July 2001. Fight, Andrew. The Ratings Game. London: Wiley, 2001. Greenberg, Susan. “New Rating Agency Causes a Stir,” The Guardian, February 13, 1993. Hawkins, David F., Barbara A. Brown and Walter J. Campbell. 1983. Rating Industrial Bonds. Morristown, N.J.: Financial Executives Research Foundation, 1983. Hayek, F.A. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1949. Heisler, Jeffrey. "Recent Research in Behavioral Finance." Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, Volume 3, Number 5, December 1994. Hewson, Martin and Timothy J. Sinclair. Editors. Approaches to Global Governance Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999. Kilpatrick, Lynne. “Debt-Rating's Flaws,” The Financial Times of Canada, March 30-April 5, 1992, 1. Kirkland, Edward C. Industry Comes of Age: Busines, Labor and Public Policy 1860-1897. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 1961. Liu, Betty W. “Big Debt Downgrades in Asia Turn Harsh Spotlight on Ratings Firms,” Asian Wall Street Journal, October 13, 1997, page 27. Mayer, Colin and Xavier Vives “Introduction,” in Colin Mayer and Xavier Vives (eds.) Capital Markets and Financial Intermediation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Milgrom, Paul R., Douglas C. North and Barry R. Weingast, "The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs." Economics and Politics, Volume 2, Number 1, March 1990, 1-23. Monroe, Ann. “Rating the Rating Agencies.” Treasury & Risk Management. July 1995. Moody’s Investors Service. “About Moody’s.” www.moodys.com. July 2001. Moran, Michael. The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution: The US, UK and Japan. New York: St. Martin's, 1991. Powell, Walter W. and Laurel Smith-Doerr. "Networks and Economic Life," in Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton and New York: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation, 1994. Ratner, Sidney, James H. Soltow and Richard Sylla. The Evolution of the American Economy: Growth, Welfare, and Decision Making. New York: Basic books, 1979. Roberts, John. “Contesting the Ratings.” International Management, October 1991, volume 46, number 8, 83. Scott, John. "Corporate Groups and Network Structure," in Joseph McCahery, Sol Picciotto and Colin Scott (eds.) Corporate Control and Accountability: Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations,” Release Number 33-7085. Washington, D.C.: SEC, August 31, 1994. Sinclair, Timothy J. "Between State and Market: Hegemony and Institutions of Collective Action Under Conditions of International Capital Mobility," Policy Sciences, Volume 27, Number 4, 1994a, 447-466. _______. "Passing Judgement: Credit Rating Processes as Regulatory Mechanisms of Governance in the Emerging World Order," Review of International Political Economy, Volume 1, Number 1, Spring, 1994b, 133- 159. _______. "Guarding the Gates of Capital: Credit Rating Processes and the Global Political Economy," unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, York University, Toronto, 1995. _______. “Reinventing Authority: Embeddded Knowledge Networks and the New Global Finance.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Volume 18, Number 4, August 2000, 487-502. Smelser, Neil J., and Richard Swedberg. Editors. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage Foundation, 1994. Standard & Poor's Corporation. “S&P Opposes Regulatory Intervention in Rating Activity,” Standard & Poor's Canadian Focus, 1995, 6-7. Strange, Susan. States and Markets, second edition. London: Pinter, 1994. Streeck, Wolfgang and Philippe C. Schmitter. "Community, Market, State - and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order," in Wolfgang Streeck and Philippe C. Schmitter (eds.) Private Interest Government: Beyond State and Market. London: Sage, 1985. Toffler, Alvin. Powershift. New York: Bantam, 1990. United States Department of Justice. “DOJ Urges SEC to Increase Competition For Securities Ratings Agencies.” Press Release. Washington, DC. March 6, 1998.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2036

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us