The Library

Green and producer lobbies: enemies or allies?

Tools

Conconi, Paola (2001) Green and producer lobbies: enemies or allies? Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation) (No.78/).

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Conconi_wp7801.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (150Kb)

Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

We employ a common agency model to study the influence of green and producer lobbies on the determination of trade and environmental policies. We focus on two large countries that are linked by trade flows and transboundary pollution. We show that the nature of the relationship between the lobbies and the relative effciency of unilateral and cooperative policy outcomes depend crucially whether governments use one or both policy instruments, whether they act in a unilateral or cooperative manner, and the size of the ‘emission leakages’ and the associated transboundary spillovers.

Item Type:

Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Lobbying, Environmentalism -- Political aspects, Agriculture and politics, Commercial policy, Environmental policy -- Citizen participation

Series Name:

Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)

Publisher:

University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Place of Publication:

Coventry

Official Date:

July 2001

Dates:

Date	Event
July 2001	Published

Number:

No.78/

Number of Pages:

Status:

Not Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), University of Warwick

References:

Aidt, T. S. (1998). “Political Internalization of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy”, Journal of Public Economics 69, 1-16.
Austen-Smith, D. (1997). “Endogenous Informational Lobbying”, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Nota di Lavoro 27/97.
Bernheim, B. D. and M. D. Whinston (1986). “Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 1-31.
Bernstein, P.M,W. D.Montgomery, and T. F. Rutherford (1999). “Global Impacts of the Kyoto Agreement: Results from the MS-MRT Model”, Resource and Energy Economics 21, 375-413.
Cadot, O., J. de Melo, and M. Olarreaga (1997). “Lobbying and the Structure of Protection”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1574.
Clinton Administration (1998). “The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change: Administrative Economic Analysis”. White House, Washington, DC.
Conconi, P. (2000). “Can Green Lobbies Replace a World Environmental Organization?”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Note di Lavoro: 56/2000.
Cooper, B. R., and M. S. Taylor (1995). “Trade and Transboundary Pollution”, American Economic Review 85, 716-737.
Fredriksson, P. (1997). “The Political Economy of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 44-58.
Fredriksson, P. (1999). “The Political Economy of Trade Liberalization and Environmental Policy”, Southern Economic Journal 65, 513-525.
Gawande, K., and U. Bandyopadhyay (2000). “Is Protection for Sale? Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection,” Review of Economics and Statistics 82(1), 139-152.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1994). “Protection for Sale”, American Economic Review 84, 833-850.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1995). “TradeWars and Trade Talks”, Journal of Political Economy 103, 675-708.
Grossman, G. M. and E. Helpman (1996). “Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics”, Review of Economic Studies 63, 265-286.
Hausman, R. F., and D. J. Zaelke (1992). “The Collision of Environment and Trade: the GATT Tuna/Dolphin Decision,” Environmental Law Report 22.
Hillman, A. L. (1982). “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives”, American Economic Review 72, 1180-1187.
Hillman, A. L., and H. W. Ursprung (1988). “Domestic Politics, Foreign Interest and International Trade Policy”, American Economic Review 78, 729-745.
Hillman, A. L., and H. W. Ursprung (1988). “The In‡uence of Environmental Concerns on the Political Determination of Trade Policy,” in K. Anderson, and R. Blackhurst (eds.), The Greening of World Trade Issues. Harvester Wheatcheaf, New York.
Hillman, A. L., and H. W. Ursprung (1994). “Greens, Supergreens, and International Trade Policy: Environmental Concerns and Protectionism”, in C. Carraro (ed.), Trade, Innovation, Environment. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Husted, A. L., and J. M. Logsdon (1997). “The Impacts of NAFTA on Mexico’s Environmental Policy, Growth and Change 28, 24-48.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996). Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Manne, A. S., and R. G. Richels (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance—The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Manne, A. S., and R. G. Richels (1998). “The Kyoto Protocol: a Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?”, mimeo.
Markusen, J. R. (1975a). “International Externalities and Optimal Tax Structures”, Journal of International Economics 5, 15-29.
Markusen, J. R. (1975b). “Cooperative Control of International Pollution and Common Property Resources”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 89, 618-632.
Mitra, D. (1999). “Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection: A Long-Run Model of Trade Policy Determination”, American Economic Review 89, 1116-1134.
Nordhaus,W. D., and J. G. Boyer (1998). “Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol”, paper presented at the EnergyModelling Forum meeting, Snowmass, Colorado, 10-11 August.
Olivera-Martins, J., J-M Burniaux, and J. P. Martin (1992). “Trade and the Effectiveness of Unilateral CO2-Abatement Policies: Evidence From GREEN”, OECD Economic Studies 19, 124-140.
Olson, M., 1965, The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peltzman, S. (1976). “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”, Journal of Law and Economics 19, 211-240.
Persson, T. and G. Tabellini (2000). Political Economics and Economic Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Perroni, C., and R.M.Wigle (1994). “International Trade and Environmental Quality: How Important are the Linkages?”, Canadian Journal of Economics 27, 551-567.
Rama, M., and G. Tabellini (1998). “Lobbying by Capital and Labor over Trade and Labor Market Policies”, European Economic Review 42, 1295-1316.
Rodrik, D. (1995), “Political Economy of Trade Policy”, in G. Grossman, and K. Rogoff (eds.) Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. Elsevier Science.
Schleich, J. (1999). “Environmental Quality with Endogenous Domestic and Trade Policies”, European Journal of Political Economy 15, 53-71.
Stigler, G. J. (1971). “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, Bell Journal of Economics 2, 359-365.
VanGrasstek, C. (1992). “The Political Economy of Trade and Environment in the United States,” in P. Low, International Trade and the Environment. World Bank, Washington, DC.