Fair reweighting of the votes in the EU Council of Ministers and the choice of majority requirement for qualified majority voting during successive enlargements
Leech, Dennis (2001) Fair reweighting of the votes in the EU Council of Ministers and the choice of majority requirement for qualified majority voting during successive enlargements. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)).
WRAP_Leech_wp7501.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/cgi/users/home?screen=EP...
This paper examines the system of Qualified Majority Voting, used by the Council of Ministers of the European Union, from the perspective of enlargement of the Union. It uses an approach based on power indices due to Penrose, Banzhaf and Coleman to make two analyses: (1) the question of the voting power of member countries from the point of view of fairness, and (2) the question of how the majority quota required for QMV should be determined. It studies two scenarios for change from 2005 onwards envisaged by the Nice Treaty: (1) no enlargement, the EU comprising 15 member countries, and (2) full enlargement to 27 members by the accession of all the present twelve candidates. The proposal is made that fair weights be determined algorithmically as a technical or routine matter as the membership changes. The analysis of how the quota affects power shows the trade-offs that countries face between their blocking power and the power of the Council to act. The main findings are: (1) that the weights laid down in the Nice Treaty are close to being fair, the only significant discrepancies being the under representation of Germany and Romania, and the over representation of Spain and Poland; (2) the majority quota required for a decision is set too high for the Council of Ministers to be an effective decision making body.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe)|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Council of the European Union, Voting research -- European Union countries, Democracy -- European Union countries, Representative government and representation -- European Union countries|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||31|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Banzhaf, John F (1965), “Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis”, Rutgers Law Review, vol 19, 1965, 317-343 Coleman, James S.(1971), “Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act,” in Social Choice, (Lieberman, Ed.), pp 277-287, Gorden and Breach. Dubey and L.S.Shapley (1979), “The Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Index”, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol 4, 99-131. EU (2001), Treaty of Nice Amending the Treaty of the European Union, the Treaties Establishing the European Communities and Certain Related Acts, EU Document CONFER 4820/00 28 February. Felsenthal, Dan S. and M. Machover (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. ------------------------- (2000), Enlargement of the EU and Weighted Voting in its Council of Ministers, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, VPP 01/00, http://www.lse.ac.uk/votingpower. --------------------------- (2001a), “Myths and Meanings of Voting Power: Comments on a Symposium”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13(1),81-97. ---------------------------(2001b) The Treaty of Nice and Qualified Majority Voting, London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, VPP 02/01, http://www.lse.ac.uk/votingpower. Garrett, G. and G. Tsebelis (1996), "An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism," International Organization, 1996, 50: 269-99. ------------ (1999) “Why Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU” and “More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11 (3), 291-308 and 331-8. Hosli, M. (1993), "The Admission of the European Free Trade Association States to the European Community: Effects on Voting Power in the European Community Council of Ministers," International Organization, 47, 629-43. Hosli, M. (1995), ”The Balance between Small and Large: Effects of a Double-Majority System on Voting Power in the European Union”, International Studies Quarterly, 39, 351-70. Hosli, M. (1996), “Coalitions and Power: Effects of Qualified Majority Voting in the Council of the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 2, 255-73. Hosli, M. (1998), An Institution’s Capacity to Act: What are the Effects of Majority Voting in the Council of the EU and the European Parliament?, Current European Issues, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration. Lane. Jan-Erik and Sven Berg (1999), "Relevance of Voting Power", Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1999, vol. 11, no. 3, 309-19. Laruelle, Annick and Mika Widgren (1998), “Is the Allocation of Voting Power among EU States Fair?”, Public Choice, 94, 317-339. Leech, D. (2000a), "An Empirical Comparison of the Performance of Classical Power Indices," Warwick Economic Research Papers, no. 563, University of Warwick, August 2000. ----------- (2000b), “Members’ Voting Power and the Governance of the International Monetary Fund,” Warwick Economics Research Papers, Number 583, University of Warwick. ------------(2001a), ipexact: A Computer Program for Computing Measures of Power in a Weighted Voting Body, Department of Economics, University of Warwick. ------------(2001b), ipnice: A Computer Program for the Analysis of Qualified Majority Voting Power under the Treaty of Nice, Department of Economics, University of Warwick. Nurmi, H.(1981), "The Problem of the Right Distribution of Voting Power", in M.J.Holler (ed.) Power, Voting and Voting Power, 1981, Physica-Verlag. Nurmi, H. and T. Meskanen (1999), “A Priori Power Measures and the Institutions of the European Union”, European Journal of Political Research, 35 (2), 161-79. Owen, Guillermo (1995), Game Theory, (3rd Edition), Academic Press. Penrose, L.S. (1946), "The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 109, 53-57. Shapley, L. S. and M. Shubik (1954), “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System,” American Political Science Review, 48, 787-792. Sutter, Matthias (2000) “Fair Allocation and Re-weighting of Votes and Voting Power in the EU Before and After the Next Enlargement”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4),433-449. Widgren (1994), “Voting Power in the EU and the Consequences of Two Different Enlargements”, European Economic Review, 38, 1153-70.|
Actions (login required)