The Library

Strategic trade policy and the threat of regionalism

Tools

Conconi, Paola (2001) Strategic trade policy and the threat of regionalism. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation) (No.73/).

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Conconi_wp7301.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (139Kb)

Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

We examine the formation of trade agreements when markets are characterized by imperfect competition and governments can alter the strategic interaction between oligopolistic firms through the use of import tariffs and export subsidies. Using a simple three-country model of intra-industry trade, we show that whether preferential trade agreements are stepping stones or stumbling blocs towards the attainment of multilateral cooperation depends on the degree of product di¤erentiation and industry concentration. However, when import tariffs are the only available policy instrument, global free trade is always sustainable. Our analysis provides a rationale for the recent attempts to strengthen international rules against the use of export subsidies. It also suggests that focusing on one dimension of strategic interaction only might result in drawing incorrect conclusions about the outcome of the trade negotiations.

Item Type:

Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JZ International relations

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Competition, Imperfect, Commercial policy, Regionalism (International organization), Tariff, Export duties

Series Name:

Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)

Publisher:

University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Place of Publication:

Coventry

Official Date:

June 2001

Dates:

Date	Event
June 2001	Published

Number:

No.73/

Number of Pages:

Status:

Not Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), University of Warwick

References:

Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger (1994). “Strategic Export Subsidies and Reciprocal Trade Agreements: The Natural Monopoly Case”, NBER Working Paper No. 5574.
Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger (1997). “Multilateral Tari¤ Cooperation During the Formation of Regional Free Trade Areas”, International Economic Review 38, 291-319.
Baldwin, R., and P. Krugman (1988). “Market Access and Competition: a Simulation Study of 16K Random Access Memories”, in R. Feenstra (ed.), Empirical Research in Industrial Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brander, J. A. (1981). “Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities”, Journal of International Economics 11, 1-14.
Brander, J. A., and P. Krugman (1983). “A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade”, Journal of International Economics 15, 313-321.
Brander, J. A., and B. J. Spencer (1984a). “Tariff Protection and Imperfect Competition”, in H. Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Brander, J. A., and B. J. Spencer (1984b). “Trade Warfare: Tariffs and Cartels”, Journal of International Economics 16, 227-242.
Bulow, J. I, J. D. Geanakoplos, and P. D. Klemperer (1985). “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Strategic Complements”, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 488-511.
Cini, M., and L. McGowan (1998). Competition Policy in the European Union. MacMillan, London.
Collie, D. R. (1993). “Profit-Shifting Export Subsidies and the Sustainability of Free Trade”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 40, 408-419.
Collie, D. R. (1997). “Bilateralism is Good: Trade Blocs and Strategic Export Subsidies”, Oxford Economic Papers 49, 504-520.
Conconi, P., and C. Perroni (2000). “Issue Linkage and Issue Tie-in in International Negotiations”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Note di Lavoro: 57/2000.
Coopeland, B. R. (1990). “Strategic Interaction among Nations: Negotiable and Nonnegotiable Trade Barriers”, Canadian Journal of Economics 23, 84-108.
Dixit, A. K. (1984). “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries”, Economic Journal 94, 1-16.
Dixit, A. K. (1988). “Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties under Oligopoliy”, European Economic Review 32, 55-68.
Flam, H. and H. Nordstrom (1994). “Why Do Car Prices Di¤er Before Tax Between European Countries?”, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 1181.
Fratzsher, O. (1996). “Welfare Effects of Trading Blocs”, IMF mimeo.
Jackson, J. H. (1998). The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gatsios, K., and L. Karp (1995). “The Welfare E¤ects of Imperfect Harmonisation of Trade and Industrial Policy”, Economic Journal 102, 107-116.
Hahn, F. H. (1962). “The Stability of the Cournot Oligopoly Solution”, Review of Economic Studies 32, 329-331.
Horstmann, I. J., and J. R. Markusen (1986). “Up the Average Cost Curve: Ineffcient Entry and the New Protectionsim”, Journal of International Economics 20, 225-247.
Kennan, J., and R. Riezman (1990). “Optimal Tariff Equilibria with Customs Unions”, Canadian Journal of Economics 90, 70-83.
Kose, M. A., and R. Riezman (1999). “Understanding the Welfare Implications of Preferential Trade Agreements”, CSGRWorking Paper 45/99, University of Warwick.
Kowalczyk, C., and T. Sjöström (1994). “Bringing GATT into the Core”, Economica 61, 301-317.
Krugman, P. (1984). “Import Protection and Export Promotion: International Competition in the Presence of Oligopoly and Economies of Scale”, in H. Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Krugman, P. (1991).“Is Bilateralism Bad?”, in Helpman, E. and Razin, A. (eds.), International Trade and Trade Policy, 9-24. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Laird, S. “Export Policy and the WTO”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 8, 73-88.
Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables (1988). “Trade Policywith Increasing Returns and Imperfect Competition: Contradictory Results from Competing Assumptions”, Journal of International Economics 24, 299-316.
Panagaryia, A. (2000). “Evaluating the Case forExport Subsidies”, World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2276.
Richardson, M. (1994). “Customs Unions and Domestic Taxes”, Canadian Journal of Economics 27, 537-550.
Richardson, M. (1999). “Trade and Competition Policies: Concordia Discors?”, Oxford Economic Papers 51, 649-664.
Sampson, G. P. (1996). “Compatibility of Regional and Multilateral Trade Arrangements: Reforming the WTO Process”, American Economic Review 86, 82-88.
Sinclair, P. and Vines, D. (1994). “Do Fewer, Larger Trade Blocs Imply Greater Protectionism?”, International Economics Study Group Meeting, London.
Venables, A. J. (1990). “International Capacity Choice and National Market Games”, Journal of International Economics 29, 23-42.
Whalley, J., and C. Hamilton (1996). The Trading System After the Uruguay Round. Institute of International Economics, Washington, DC.
Yi, S.-S. (1996). “Endogenous Formation of Customs Unions Under Imperfect Competition: Open Regionalism Is Good”, Journal of International Economics 41, 151-175.