The Library

What can the developing countries infer from the Uruguay Round models for the Millennium Round positions?

Tools

Whalley, John (2000) What can the developing countries infer from the Uruguay Round models for the Millennium Round positions? Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation) (No.60/).

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Whalley_wp6000.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1196Kb)

Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

This paper discusses the results from general equilibrium trade models executed towards the end of the Uruguay Round, reporting both aggregate and regional gains. These results were generated some 5 years ago, and were important to the debates at the end of the Uruguay Round as to what would be the foregone gains were the Round not to conclude. The paper argues that there are substantial, and at times hard to explain inconsistencies across model results. One model shows most of the gains come from agricultural liberalization, another from textiles, and yet another from tariff cuts. One model shows developing countries account for around 10% of the total gain, another shows them to gain over 50%. One model shows developing countries losing from elimination of the MFA, another shows them as large gainers. One model shows that imperfectly competitive and scale economy effects double global gains, another shows almost no impact. These differences occur even where similar data sets, and benchmark years are used, and are hard to explain on the basis of parametric specifications for models seemingly used though these are frequently poorly exposited. The paper also discusses the verification of models relative to behaviour since the Round concluded, expressing skepticism as to its feasibility for reasons set out in the paper. It also attempts to discuss what, if any, are the implications for the developing countries, and the possible ways forward in making these models more useable in the Millennium Round.

Item Type:

Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JZ International relations

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Uruguay Round (1987-1994), International trade, Equilibrium (Economics), Developing countries -- Economic conditions

Series Name:

Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)

Publisher:

University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation

Place of Publication:

Coventry

Official Date:

October 2000

Dates:

Date	Event
October 2000	Published

Number:

No.60/

Number of Pages:

Status:

Not Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

References:

Abrego, L. and J. Whalley (1999) “The Choice of Structural Model in Trade and Wage
Decompositions” University of Warwick, mimeo.
Bach, C.F., B. Dimaranan, T.W. Hertel, and W. Martin (forthcoming) “Market Growth, Structural
Change, and the Gains from the Uruguay Round” Review of International Economics, to
appear.
Brown, D.K., A.V. Deardorff, A.K. Fox, and R.M. Stern (1995) “Computational Analysis of Goods
and Services Liberalization in the Uruguay Round” in (eds) W. Martin and A. Winters, The
Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, World Bank Discussion Paper #307.
Brown, D.K., A.V. Deardorff, A.K. Fox, and R.M. Stern (1996) “The Liberalization of Services
Trade: Potential Impacts in the Aftermath of the Uruguay Round” in (eds) W. Martin and
L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge University
Press.
Francois, J.F., B. McDonald, and H. Nordström (1994) “The Uruguay Round: A Global General
Equilibrium Assessment” CEPR Discussion Paper.
Francois, J.F. B. McDonald, and H. Nordström (1995) “Assessing the Uruguay Round” in (eds) W.
Martin and A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies, World Bank
Discussion Paper #307.
Francois, J.F., B. McDonald, and H. Nordström (1996a) “A User’s Guide to Uruguay Round
Assessments” Discussion Paper #1410, Centre for Economic Policy Research, June.
Francois, J.F., B. McDonald, and H. Nordström (1996b) “The Uruguay Round: a numerically based
qualitative assessment” in (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the
Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press.
Ghosh, M., C. Perroni, and J. Whalley (1998) “The Value of MFN Treatment” NBER Working
Paper #5467.
Goldin, I. and D. van der Mensbrugghe (1996) “Assessing agricultural tariffication under the
Uruguay Round “ in (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the
Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, G.W., T.F. Rutherford and D.G. Tarr (1996) “Quantifying the Uruguay Round” in (eds)
W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and The Developing Economies, the
World Bank Discussion Paper no. 307, 1995; (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The
Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press 1996; and
Economic Journal, September 1997, vol.107, no.44, pp.1405-1430.
Hertel, T., W. Martin, K. Yanagishima, and B. Dimaranan (1996) “Liberalizing Manufactures Trade
in a Changing World Economy” in (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round
and the Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press.
Hoekman, B. (1995) “Tentative First Steps: An Assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on
Services” in (ed) W. Martin, and L.A. Winters The Uruguay Round and the Developing
Economies, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 307, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
Ingco, M. (1996) “Tariffication in the Uruguay Round: How Much Liberalization?” The World
Economy, July, pp.425-46.
Kehoe, T.J., C. Polo, and F. Sancho (1995) “An Evaluation of the Performance of an Applied
General Equilibrium Model of the Spanish Economy”, Economic Theory, 6(1), pp. 115-141.
Nguyen, T., C. Perroni, and R. Wigle (1991) “The Value of a Uruguay Round Success” The World
Economy (vol.14, December) pp.359-374.
Nguyen, T., C. Perroni, and R.M. Wigle (1993) “An Evaluation of the Draft Final Act of the
Uruguay Round” Economic Journal, vol.100, no.403, pp.1190-1205.
Nguyen, T., C. Perroni, and R. Wigle (1995) “A Uruguay Round Success?” The World Economy
(vol.18, January) pp.25-30.
Page, S. with M. Davenport (1994) World Trade Reform: Do Developing Countries Gain or Lose?
ODI Special Report (Overseas Development Institute, London).
Perroni, C. (1998) “The Uruguay Round and its Impact on Developing Countries: An Overview of
Model Results” in (eds) H. Thomas and J. Whalley, Uruguay Round Results and the
Emerging Trade Agenda, UNCTAD.
Perroni, C. and J. Whalley (forthcoming) “The New Regionalism: Trade Liberalization or
Insurance?” Canadian Journal of Economics (to appear).
Shoven, J.B. and J. Whalley (1992) Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press.
Srinivasan, T.N. and J. Whalley (1986) General Equilibrium Trade Policy Modelling, MIT Press,
Cambridge.
UNCTAD (1998) “Least Developed Countries and the Results of the Uruguay Round” in (eds) H.
THOMAS and J. WHALLEY, Uruguay Round Results and the Emerging Trade Agenda,
UNCTAD.
Watal, J. (1999) “Pharmaceutical Patents, Prices, and Welfare Losses: A Simulation Study of Policy
Options for India Under the WTO TRIPS Agreement” (mimeo).
Whalley, J. (1985) Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas, MIT Press.
Whalley, J. (1986) “Hidden Challenges in Recent General Equilibrium Exercises” in ed. J. Piggott
and J. Whalley New Directions in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, Cambridge
University Press.
WTO (1995) “Overview of Development in International Trade and the Trading System” Annual
Report by the Director-General, WT/TPR/OV/1.