Environmental considerations in a new multilateral agricultural negotiation, and associated Developing Country implications
Whalley, John (1999) Environmental considerations in a new multilateral agricultural negotiation, and associated Developing Country implications. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.
WRAP_Whalley_wp4699.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...
This paper discusses the potential role for environmental considerations in agricultural negotiations in the next WTO trade round, from developing country perspective. For now, as a non-trade issue in the new negotiations, environmental considerations are not the dominant concern, which is food security; although conflicts have arisen over the issue of multi functionality (agriculture serving multiple purposes including providing support for the rural environment), whether export subsidies have any rationale on environmental grounds, and the environmental case for the elimination of fishing subsidies. If new agricultural disciplines remain focused on the Uruguay Round issues of tightening the existing structure of bound tariffs, and limitations on domestic supports and export subsidies, then environmental concerns could enter in all of these. I suggest that for the developing countries, available studies seemingly point to substantial gains for them from internalization of externalities related to their own rural/agricultural activities and seemingly, further, environmental concerns should dominate trade concerns. However, the agriculture disciplines from the Uruguay Round seemingly provide relatively inefficient instruments to achieve substantive internalization of their externalities. Also, allowing environmental concerns to enter runs the risk of market restricting justifications (multi functionality) adversely affecting their export access to foreign markets. Finally, among the list of items on the trade and environmental agenda (Art 20 exceptions, MEAs, lax standards, eco-labeling) few or none can be addressed adequately as part of an environmental negotiation, and so environment in an agricultural negotiation is no substitute for a wider trade and environment negotiation. The bottom line is to suggest that developing countries focus heavily on environmental issues, perhaps even more so than trade, but that a WTO negotiation on agriculture is not the best forum to seek a remedy.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
J Political Science > JZ International relations
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||World Trade Organization, Agricultural industries, Environmental justice, International trade, Developing countries -- Economic conditions|
|Series Name:||Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||35|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation|
|References:||Abrego, L., C. Perroni, J. Whalley, and R. Wigle (forthcoming) “Trade and Environment: Bargained Outcomes From Linked Negotiations” Review of International Economics (to appear) and NBER Working Paper, no. 6216. ADB (Asian Development Bank) (1997) Emerging Asia-Changes and Challenges, Manilla. Agarwal, Anil (1996) “Pay-offs to Progress”, Down to Earth (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi) 5(10): 31-39. Anderson, K. (1992a) “Effects on the Environment and Welfare of Liberalization of World Trade: The Case of Coal and Food” in (ed.) K.A. Anderson and R. Blackhurst The Greening of World Trade, London, Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Anderson, K. (1992b) “Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Environment: A Global Perspective” The World Economy, vol.15, no.1, pp.153-72. Barbier, F. (1996) “The Economics of Soil Erosion: Theory, Methodology and Examples” Economy and Environmental Programme of South East Asia, Special Paper, May 1996. Coase, R. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost” The Journal of Law Economics. Cruz, W., H.A. Francisco and Z.T. Conway (1988) “The On-Site and Downstream Costs of Soil Erosion in the Magat and Pantabangan Watersheds” Journal of Philippine Development, vol.15 (26,1), pp.85-111. Cruz, W., M. Munasinghe and J. J. Warford (1997) “The Greening of Economic Policy Reform’ vol.1: Principles; vol.2: Case Studies”, The World Bank Environmental Department and Economic Development Institute. Ed. Glover D., and T. Jessup (1999) Indonesia’s Fires and Haze: The Cost of Catastrophe, IDRC/ISEAS, Singapore and Canada. Francois, J.F., H. McDonald, and H. Nordström (1996) “The Uruguay Round: a numerically based qualitative assessment” in ed. W. Martin and A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and The Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Goldin, I. and D. van der Mensbrugghe (1996) “Assessing agricultural tariffication under the Uruguay Round “ in (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press. Harrison, G.W., T.F. Rutherford and D.G. Tarr (1996) “Quantifying the Uruguay Round” in (eds) W. Martin and L.A. Winters, The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press 1996. Hathaway, D.E. (1987) “Agriculture and the GATT: Rewriting the Rules”, Institute for International Economics, vol. 20, September, Washington D.C. ICTSD (1999) Bridges Between Trade and Sustainable Development, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, vol.3, no.5, 1999. Ingersent, K.A., A.J. Rayner, and R.C. Hine (1995). "Expost Evaluation of the Uruguay Round Agricultural Agreement". The World Economy, September, pp.707-728. Jackson, J.H. (1989) The World Trading System, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Jha, R., and J. Whalley (1999) “The Environmental Regime in Developing Countries” paper presented at a FEEM /NBER Conference, Milan, June 1999. Knut et.al. (1996) “The Cost of Soil Erosion in Nicaragua” Ecological Economics, vol. 16, pp.129-145. Lipsey, R.G. and K.J.Lancaster (1957) “The General Theory of the Second Best” Review of Economic Studies, vol.24, pp.11-32. López, R. (1997) “Evaluating Economywide Policies in the Presence of Agricultural Environmental Externalities: The Case of Ghana” in The Greening of Economic Policy Reform Volume II: Case Studies, W. Cruz, M. Munasinghe and J.J. Warford (eds.), pp. 27-54. Magrath, W. and P. Arens (1989) “The Costs of Soil Erosion on Java: A Natural Resource Accounting Approach”, Environment Working Paper 18, World Bank, Environment Department, Washington, D.C. Meade, J.E. (1952)”External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation” Economic Journal, vol.62, March. Pigou, A.C. (1918) The Economics of Welfare, MacMillan Resosudarmo, B. (1999) “The Economy Wide Impacts of Integrated Pest Management in Indonesia” Economy and Environment Programme of South East Asia (EEPSEA), Singapore. Smil, V. (1992) “Environmental Changes as a Source of Conflict and Economic Losses in China” Paper prepared for a Workshop on Environmental Change, Economic Decline, and Civil Strife, Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Kuala Lumpur, 1991. Swinback, A. (1999) “EU Agriculture, Agenda 2000 and the WTO Commitments” The World Economy, January, vol.22, no.1, pp.41-54. Tangerman, S. (1997) “A Developed Country Perspective of the Agenda for the Next WTO Round of Agricultural Negotiations” Program for the Study of International Organizations, Occasional Paper, WTO Series no. 5, Geneva. Tussie, D. (1999) “The Environment and Trade Negotiations: Open Coops in the Developing World” The World Economy, June, vol.22, no.4, pp.535-546. Uimonen, P., and J. Whalley (1997) Environmental Issues in the New World Trading System, MacMillan, London. Uimonen, P. (1998) “The Environmental Dilemmas of the World Trade Organization” in ed. J.J.Schott, Launching New Global Trade Talks: An Action Agenda, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. UN (1999)Human Development Report , United Nations, New York. Weerahewa, J. et.al. (1999) “Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: The Case of Tariff Reduction for Potato in Sri Lanka” Economy and Environment Programme of South East Asia (EEPSEA), Singapore. Whalley, J. (1996) “Trade and Environment Beyond Singapore” NBER Working Paper no. 5768, September. WTO (1998a) Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, WTO Agreement Series, no. 4, Geneva. WTO (1998b) Annual Report 1998; Geneva. WTO (1998c) “Non Trade Concerns in the Next Agricultural Negotiations” Submission by Argentina to the Committee on Trade and Environment; WT/CTE/W/97. WTO (1999a) “Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization in the Agricultural Sector” Submission by Norway to the Committee on Trade and Environment; WT/CTE/W/100. WTO (1999b) “Agriculture and the Environment: The Case of Export Subsidies” Submission by Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Paraguay, the Philippines, Thailand, United States, and Uruguay to the Committee on Trade and Environment; WT/CTE/W/106.|
Actions (login required)