Kose, M. Ayhan and Riezman, Raymond Glenn (1999) Understanding the welfare implications of preferential trade agreements. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Kose_wp4599.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (730Kb)

Abstract

This paper examines various implications of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs), namely Customs Unions (CUs) and Free Trade Areas (FTAs), in the context of a multi-country general equilibrium model based on comparative advantage considerations. We calibrate the model to represent countries with symmetric endowments, and compare the impact of those agreements with free trade and a non-cooperative Nash equilibria. Utilizing aggregate and disaggregate welfare change measures, we quantify the welfare effects of trade arrangements. In particular, we develop a numerical approximation procedure to decompose the welfare changes into two components associated with the variations in terms of trade and volume of trade. The results of our analysis indicate that FTAs are better than CUs on welfare grounds for the world as a whole since both member and nonmember economies enjoy welfare benefits in an FTA. Further, we show that, for certain endowment distributions, upon formation of an FTA, nonmember economies get larger welfare benefits than member economies do. Nonetheless, member economies have larger welfare gains in CUs than in FTAS. Our welfare decompositions suggest that a significant fraction of the welfare changes in both member and nonmember countries is explained by the volume of trade effect for both types of PTAS. This implies that, having free access to larger markets, along with greater market power are both important aspects of PTAS. Comparison across endowment distributions indicates that as countries become more divergent in their endowments, the volume of trade effect gets more pronounced for CUs as well as for FTAS. The absence of policy coordination between the members of FTAs decreases the market power of the member economies and induces welfare losses that are associated with the terms of trade effect. However, the ten-ns of trade effect results in significant welfare gains for the members of CUs since they jointly determine their tariff rates.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HF Commerce J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Tariff preferences, Customs unions, Trade blocs, Free trade, Welfare economics, Equilibrium (Economics)
Series Name:	Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher:	University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	October 1999
Number:	No.45/
Number of Pages:	32
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger, 1993a, Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of regional free trade areas, NBER Working paper No: 4363 Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger, 1993b, Multilateral tariff cooperation during the formation of customs unions, NBER Working paper No: 4543 Baldwin, R., and A. J. Venables, 1995, Regional Economic Integration, in Handbook of International Economics Vol. III in G. N. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds.), North Holland. Bhagwati, J. and A. Panagariya, 1996, Preferential trading areas and multilateralism: strangers, friends or foes?, in Free Trade Areas or Free Trade? The Economics of Preferential Trading Agreements in J. Bhagwati and A. Panagariya (eds.), AEI press, forthcoming. Bond, E., 1990, The optimal tariff structure in higher dimensions, International Economic Review, 31,1, 103-116. Bond, E., and C. Syropoulos, 1996, The size of trading blocs: Market power and world welfare effects, Journal of International Economics, 40, 1/2, 411-437. Cole, H.L., and M. Obstfeld, 1991, Commodity trade and International risk sharing: How much do Financial Markets Matter?, Journal of Monetary Economics 28,3-24. Deardorff, A. V., and R. M. Stern, 1994, Multilateral trade negotiations and preferential trading arrangements, in A. V. Deardorff and R. M. Stern (eds.), Analytical and Negotiating Issues in the Global Trading System, University of Michigan Press, 27-94. De Melo, J., A. Panagariya, and D. Rodrik, 1993, The new regionalism: a country perspective, in J. De Melo and A. Panagariya eds., New dimensions in regional integration, Cambridge University Press. Ethier, F., 1996, Regionalism in a multilateral world, mimeo, University of Pennsylvania. Frankel, J. A., E. Stein, and S. J. Wei, 1996, Regional trading agreements: natural or super-natural?, American Economic Review 86, 52-56. Gatsios, K., and L. Karp, 1991, Delegation games in customs unions, Review of Economic Studies 58, 391-397. Gunter, F. R., 1989, Customs union theory: retrospect and prospect, in D. Greenaway, T. Hyclak, and R. J. Thorton eds., Economic aspects of regional trading arrangements, Harwester Wheatsheaf. Hamilton, B., and J. Whalley, 1985, Geographically discriminatory trade arrangements, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 446-455. Harrison, G.W., T. F. Rutherford, and I. Wooton, 1993, An alternative welfare decomposition for customs unions, Canadian Journal of Economics 26, 961-968. Haveman, J., 1996, Some welfare effects of sequential customs union formation, Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 941-958. Joshi, S., and R. Shivakumar, 1997, Endogenous trading blocs: customs unions versus free trade areas, mimeo, The George Washington University Kemp, M., and H. Y. Wan, 1976, An elementary proposition concerning the formation of customs unions, Journal of International Economics 6, 95-97. Kennan, J., and R. Riezman, 1988, Do big countries win tariff wars?, International Economic Review 29, 81-85. Kennan, J., and R. Riezman, 1990, Optimal tariff equilibria with customs unions, Canadian Journal of Economics 90, 70-83. Kose, M. A., and R. Riezman, 1997, Small countries and regionalism, mimeo, University of Iowa. Kowalczyk, C. and T. Sjostrom, 1994, Bringing GATT into the core, Economica, 61, 301-317. Kowalczyk, C, 1996, Welfare and customs unions, mimeo, Tufts University. Krueger, A. O., 1995, Free trade agreements versus customs unions, NBER Working Paper No:5084 Krugman, P., 1991a, Is bilateralism bad?, in E. Helpman and A. Razin, eds., International Trade and Trade Policy, Cambridge, MIT Press Krugman, P., 1991b, The move toward free trade zones, in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones. A symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Lucas, R.E., 1987, Models of Business Cycles, Oxford, Blackwell Perroni, C. and J. Whalley, 1994, The new regionalism: trade liberalization or insurance?, NBER WP#4626 Perroni, C. and J. Whalley, 1996, How severe is global retaliation risk under increasing regionalism?, American Economic Review 86, 57-61. Pomfret, R., 1996, Are free trade areas better than customs unions?, Working Paper, University of Adelaide. Richardson, M., 1993, Endogenous protection and trade diversion, Journal of International Economics 34, 309-324. Riezman, R., 1997, Can bilateral trade agreements help induce free trade?, Working Paper No: 97-01, University of Iowa. Sampson, G. P., 1996, Compatibility of regional and multilateral trading arrangements: reforming the WTO process, American Economic Review 86, 88-82. Shibata, H., 1967, The theory of economic unions: a comparative analysis of customs unions, free trade areas, and tax unions, in C. S. Shoup (ed.) Fiscal Harmonization in Common Markets, vol. 1, Theory, Columbia University Press, 145-264. Sinclair, P., and D. Vines, 1995, Bigger trade blocs need not entail more protection, Discussion Paper No: 95-32, The University of Birmingham. Spilimbergo, A., and E. Stein, 1996, The welfare implications of trading blocs among countries with different endowments, Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper Series No: 323. Srinivasan, T. N., J. Whalley, and I. Wooton, 1993, Measuring the effects of regionalism on trade and welfare, in Regional integration and the global trading system in K. Anderson and R. Blackhurst (eds.), Harvester Wheatsheaf. Syropoulos, C., 1995, Customs unions and comparative advantage, mimeo, Pennsylvania State University. Viner, J., 1950, The customs union issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Winters, L. A., 1997, Regionalism and the rest of the world, Review of International Economics, forthcoming.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2080

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item