Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES FOR INFORMATION FEEDBACK IN GENERAL-PRACTICE

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1994) EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES FOR INFORMATION FEEDBACK IN GENERAL-PRACTICE. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 44 (378). pp. 19-24. ISSN 0960-1643

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and relative cost of three forms of information feedback to general practices - graphical, graphical plus a visit by a medical facilitator and tabular. Method. Routinely collected, centrally-field data were used where possible, analysed at practice level. Some non-routine practice data in the form of risk factor recording in medical notes, for example weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption and blood pressure, were also provided to those who requested it. The 52 participating practices were stratified and randomly allocated to one of the three feedback groups. The cost of providing each type of feedback was determined. The immediate response of practitioners to the form of feedback (acceptability), ease of understanding (intelligibility), and usefulness of regular feedback was recorded. Changes introduced as a result of feedback were assessed by questionnaire shortly after feedback, and 12 months later. Changes at the practice level in selected indicators were also assessed 12 and 24 months after initial feedback. Results. The resulting cost per effect was calculated to be 46.10 Pound for both graphical and tabular feedback, 132.50 Pound for graphical feedback plus facilitator visit and 773.00 Pound for the manual audit of risk factors recorded in the practice notes. The three forms of feedback did not differ in intelligibility or usefulness, but feedback plus a medical facilitator visit was significantly less acceptable. There was a high level of self-reported organizational change following feedback, with 69% of practices reporting changes as a direct result; this was not significantly different for the three types of feedback. There were no significant changes in the selected indicators at 12 or 24 months following feedback. The practice characteristic most closely related to better indicators of preventive practice was practice size, smaller practices performing significantly better. Separate clinics were not associated with better preventive practice. Conclusion. It is concluded that feedback strategies using graphical and tabular comparative data are equally cost-effective in general practice with about two thirds of practices reporting organizational change as a consequence; feedback involving unsolicited medical facilitator visits is less cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of manual risk factor audit is also called into question.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine
Journal or Publication Title: BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Publisher: ROYAL COL GEN PRACTITIONERS
ISSN: 0960-1643
Date: January 1994
Volume: 44
Number: 378
Number of Pages: 6
Page Range: pp. 19-24
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/20884

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us