Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Special and differential treatment in the Millennium Round

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Whalley, John (1999) Special and differential treatment in the Millennium Round. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. (Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation).

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Whalley_wp3099.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (846Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

This paper discusses special and differential treatment (SDT) for developing countries in a new WTO trade round. It argues that SDT introduced in the Uruguay Round represented a sharp departure from pre Uruguay Round SDT which had focussed on special rights to protect and preferential market access, and was characterised by a wide range of delays, exemptions, best efforts endeavours from developed countries, technical assistance and other provisions. These new provisions were arrived at late on in negotiation, and were ad hoc in design. They nonetheless represented a new form of SDT relating to special rights needed on adjustment and policy capacity grounds as developing countries integrated into the WTO system. Despite general skepticism as to the value of SDT benefits, the challenge is to more carefully rationalise and target these provisions, and to elaborate on them.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): World Trade Organisation, Doha Development Agenda (2001- ), Foreign trade regulation, Negotiation in business, Developing countries -- Economic conditions
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: May 1999
Number: No.30/
Number of Pages: 46
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Collier, P., P. Guillaumont, S. Guillaumont, and J.W. Gunning (1997) “The Future of Lomé: Europe’s Role in African Growth” The World Economy, vol.20, no.3, May, pp.285-306. Hudec, R.E. (1987) Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System, Gower for the Trade Policy Research Centre. Hudec, R.E. (1990) “The Structure of South-south Trade Preferences in the 1988 GSTP Agreement: Learning to Say MFMFN” in Whalley, ed., Developing Countries and The Global Trading System, vol.1, Thematic Studies from a Ford Foundation Supported Project (Macmillan, 1989) pp.210-237. Ingco, M.D. (1996) “Tariffication in the Uruguay Round: How Much Liberalization?” The World Economy, vol.19, no.4, July, pp.425.446. Karsenty, G. and Laird, S. (1987), “The Generalized System of Preferences: A Quantitative Assessment of the Direct Trade Effects and of Policy Options”, UNCTAD Discussion Paper No.18, UNCTAD, Geneva. Lloyd, P. and G. Sampson (1995) “Competition and Trade Policy: Identifying the Issues After the Uruguay Round” The World Economy, vol. 18, no.5, September, pp.681-707. McPhee, C.R. (1989), “A Synthesis of the GSP Study Programme”, Mimeographed Report Prepared for UNCTAD. Paparizo, A. (1998), “WTO Provisions on Least Developed Countries”, Report Prepared for the Government of Nepal (mimeo). Prebisch, R. (1962) “The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems” Economic Bulletin for Latin America, vol.7, pp.1-22. Rajapatirana, S. L.M. de la Mora and R.A. Yatawara (1997) “Political Economy of Trade Reforms 1965-1994: Latin American Style” The World Economy, vol.20, no.3, May, pp.307-337. Sorsa, P. (1996) “Sub Saharan African Own Commitments in the Uruguay Round - Myth or Reality?” The World Economy, vol.19, no.3, pp.287-306. UNCTAD (1998a) The Least Developed Countries Report, 1998; UN, Geneva. UNCTAD (1998b) Trade and Development Report, 1998; UN, Geneva. UNCTAD (1998c) “Accession to the WTO: The Process and The Issues”, Discussion Paper 16 July, 1998. Whalley, J. (1989) The Uruguay Round and Beyond: The Final Report from the Ford Foundation Project on Developing Countries and the Global Trading System, MacMillan, London. Whalley, J. (1990) “Non-discriminatory Discrimination: Special and Differential Treatment Under the GATT for Developing Countries” Economic Journal, vol.100, no.403, December, pp.1318-1328. WTO (1998a) Implementation of WTO Provisions In Favour of Developing Country Members, Note by the Secretariat, Geneva. WTO (1998b) Communication from Egypt “Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in the Multilateral Trading System”. Young, A. (1991), “Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 1106, pp.369-405.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2095

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us