Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

IMPACT OF INTRODUCING NEAR PATIENT TESTING FOR STANDARD INVESTIGATIONS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1993) IMPACT OF INTRODUCING NEAR PATIENT TESTING FOR STANDARD INVESTIGATIONS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 307 (6907). pp. 775-778.

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective-To assess the clinical and economic impact of surgery based near patient testing in general practice for six commonly used biochemical and bacteriological tests.

Design-After four months' monitoring, equipment for two bacteriological and four biochemical tests was introduced without cost into 12 practices using a crossover design. Structured request forms were used to monitor laboratory investigations.

Setting-12 general practices in west midlands and south west Thames with list sizes above 9000.

Main outcome measures-Investigation rates per 1000 consultations. Changes from baseline rates. Reasons for requesting investigations and provisional diagnoses. Cost per test and sensitivity of costs to rate of use.

Results-Investigation rates for the six tests rose by 16.5% (from 78.6/1000 consultations to 91.6/1000) when equipment was available in the surgery and reverted to baseline rates when it was withdrawn. The average weekly number of tests when equipment was available ranged from 0.5 to 10.5 (mean 9.0). Cholesterol tests were used as an addition to laboratory testing, usually for screening. Midstream urine analysis was often done in the surgery instead of in the laboratory, although 30% of samples were tested by both methods. Doctors' reasons for investigation and conditions tested were largely unaffected by availability of surgery tests. Costs for surgery tests were higher for all tests except midstream urine.

Conclusions-Availability of surgery based testing increased the number of tests performed. It was cost effective only for midstream urine analysis.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine
Journal or Publication Title: BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Publisher: BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
ISSN: 0959-8138
Official Date: 25 September 1993
Dates:
DateEvent
25 September 1993UNSPECIFIED
Volume: 307
Number: 6907
Number of Pages: 4
Page Range: pp. 775-778
Publication Status: Published

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us