Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The division and size of gains from liberalization in service networks

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bhattarai, Keshab and Whalley, John (1998) The division and size of gains from liberalization in service networks. Working Paper. University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Bhattarai_wp0398.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (196Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/wo...

Abstract

This paper emphasizes the different nature of cross border liberalization in network related services, such as telcoms, compared to liberalization in goods. In the presence of network externalities, it argues that if two disjoint country service networks involving a small and large country are connected as part of international liberalization, the per capita gain for the small country from access to a large network will be large, and the per capita gain for the large country will be small. Benefits of liberalization in network related services, unlike goods, are more likely to be approximately equally divided between large and small countries than is true of trade in goods, where benefits accrue disproportionately to the small country. We also argue that non-cooperation in network related services trade may involve more extreme retaliation than suggested for trade in goods from the optimal tariff literature, so that relative to a non-cooperative outcome, gains from liberalization in network related services become larger than from liberalization in goods. An empirical implementation of global telcoms liberalization for the US, Europe, Canada and the Rest of the World using the framework developed in the paper shows larger gains to larger regions, consistent with the theme of the paper that goods and services liberalization differ.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Externalities (Economics), Social sciences -- Network analysis, International trade, Equilibrium (Economics), Service industries, Globalization -- Economic aspects, Free trade
Series Name: Working papers (University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation)
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: March 1998
Number: No.03/
Number of Pages: 22
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
References: Cairncross F. (1997), The Death of Distance :How the Communications Revolution will Change Our Lives Orion Business, London. Choi J. P. (1994) Network Externality, compatibility, choice, and planned obsolescence, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. XLII ,June , 167-182. Economides N. (1996) Network Externatilities, complementarities, and invitations to enter, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 12, pp.211- 233. Economides N. (1996) Economics of Networks, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 14, pp. 673-699. GAMS Development Corporation (1996) GAMS: The Solver Manuals, Washington D.C. Gorman W. M.(1958 ) Tariffs, Retaliation and the Elasticity of Demand for Imports, Review of Economic Studies, June 25(3), pp. 133-62. Harris R. G. (1995) Trade and Communication Costs, Canadian Journal of Economics, Special Issue November. International Telecommunication Union (1994) World Telecommunication Development Report, Geneva. Johnson H. G.(1953-54) Optimal tariffs and Retaliation, Review of Economic Studies, 21(2), pp.142-43. Katz M. L and Shapiro C. (1986) Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no.4, pp. 822- 841. Katz M. L and Shapiro C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, Americal Economic Review, Vol. 75. no. 3, pp. 424-440. Liebowitz S.J., Margolis S. E. (1994) Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 8, No.2, Spring, pp. 133-150. Meade J.E. (1952) External Economies and Diseconomies in a competitive situation, Economic Journal, Vol. 62, March. Melvin J. R. (1989) Trade in Producer Services: A Heckscher-Ohlin Approach, Journal of Political Economy, 97(5) pp. 1180-96. World Bank (1993), World Development Report, Oxford University Press, Washington D.C.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2122

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us