Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Understanding customers' holistic perception of switches in automotive human–machine interfaces

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wellings, Tom, Williams, M. A. (Mark A.) and Tennant, C. (Charles). (2010) Understanding customers' holistic perception of switches in automotive human–machine interfaces. Applied Ergonomics, Vol.41 (No.1). pp. 8-17. ISSN 0003-6870

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Wellings_Understanding_cust_holistic_perception_WRAP.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (555Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.004

Abstract

For successful new product development, it is necessary to understand the customers' holistic experience of the product beyond traditional task completion, and acceptance measures. This paper describes research in which ninety-eight UK owners of luxury saloons assessed the feel of push-switches in five luxury saloon cars both in context (in-car) and out of context (on a bench). A combination of hedonic data (i.e. a measure of ‘liking’), qualitative data and semantic differential data was collected. It was found that customers are clearly able to differentiate between switches based on the degree of liking for the samples' perceived haptic qualities, and that the assessment environment had a statistically significant effect, but that it was not universal. A factor analysis has shown that perceived characteristics of switch haptics can be explained by three independent factors defined as ‘Image’, ‘Build Quality’, and ‘Clickiness’. Preliminary steps have also been taken towards identifying whether existing theoretical frameworks for user experience may be applicable to automotive human–machine interfaces.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
T Technology > TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > WMG (Formerly the Warwick Manufacturing Group)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Human-machine systems, Automobiles -- Design and construction, Human engineering -- Great Britain, Touch, Consumers -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Applied Ergonomics
Publisher: Pergamon
ISSN: 0003-6870
Date: January 2010
Volume: Vol.41
Number: No.1
Number of Pages: 10
Page Range: pp. 8-17
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.004
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Advantage West Midlands (AWM)
References: Adams-Bigelow and Griffin, 2005 Adams-Bigelow, M., Griffin, A., 2005. Product Development Cycle Time and Success: New Results from PDMA's Comparative Performance Assessment Study. In: Product Development and Management Association International Conference, October, San Diego, CA. Benson et al., 2007 R. Benson, I. MacRury and P. Marsh, The Secret Life of Cars and What They Reveal About Us, Not Actual Size, London (2007). Bonapace, 2002 L. Bonapace, Linking product properties to pleasure: the sensorial quality assessment method – SEQUAM. In: W. Green and P. Jordan, Editors, Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability, Taylor and Francis, London (2002), pp. 189–217. Boutrolle et al., 2007 I. Boutrolle, J. Delarue, D. Arranz, M. Rogeaux and E.P. Köster, Central location test vs. home use test: contrasting results depending on product type, Food Quality and Preference 18 (3) (2007), pp. 490–499. Burnett and Porter, 2001 G. Burnett and J. Porter, Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 55 (4) (2001), pp. 521–531. Carbonaro and Votava, 2005 S. Carbonaro and C. Votava, Paths to a new prosperity, The Nordic Textile Journal (2005), pp. 71–85. Cooper et al., 2004 R. Cooper, S. Edgett and E. Kleinschmidt, Benchmarking Best NPD Practices – III. Research Technology Management 47 (6) (2004), pp. 43–55. Cooper and Kleinschmidt, 1991 R. Cooper and E. Kleinschmidt, New product processes at leading industrial Firms, Industrial Marketing Management 20 (2) (1991), pp. 137–147. Daniel, 1990 W.W. Daniel, Applied Nonparametric Statistics (second ed.), PWS-KENT Publications, Boston (1990). Desmet and Hekkert, 2007 P. Desmet and P. Hekkert, Framework of product experience, International Journal of Design 1 (1) (2007), pp. 57–66. DTI, 2004 DTI, Innovation through people-centred design – lessons from the USA. In: N. Wakeford, Editor, Global Watch Mission Report, Department of Trade and Industry, UK (2004) URN 04/1863. Eason, 1989 K. Eason, Information Technology and Organisational Change, Taylor and Francis, London (1989). Evans and Burns, 2007 S. Evans and A. Burns, An investigation of customer delight during product evaluation: implications for the development of desirable products, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B – Journal of Engineering Manufacture 221 (11) (2007), pp. 1625–1638. Fabrigar et al., 1999 L.R. Fabrigar, D.T. Wegener, R.C. MacCallum and E.J. Strahan, Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research, Psychological Methods 4 (3) (1999), pp. 272–299. Giboreau et al., 2001 A. Giboreau, S. Navarro, P. Faye and J. Dumortier, Sensory evaluation of automotive fabrics: the contribution of categorization tasks and non verbal information to set-up a descriptive method of tactile properties, Food Quality and Preference 12 (5–7) (2001), pp. 311–322. Griffin, 1997 A. Griffin, PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices, Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (6) (1997), pp. 429–458. Hassenzahl, 2005 M. Hassenzahl, Hedonic, emotional, and experiential perspectives on product quality. In: C. Ghaouri, Editor, Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, Idea Group, Hershey, PA (2005). Hassenzahl and Tractinsky, 2006 M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, User experience – a research agenda, Behaviour and Information Technology 25 (2) (2006), pp. 91–97. Hekkert, 2006 P. Hekkert, Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design, Psychology Science 48 (2) (2006), pp. 157–172. Helander, 1997 M. Helander, The human factors profession. In: G. Salvendy, Editor, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley, New York (1997), pp. 3–16. Hsu et al., 2000 S.H. Hsu, M.C. Chuang and C.C. Chang, A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25 (4) (2000), pp. 375–391. ISO, 1999 ISO, 1999. Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization, ISO13407:1999. Jetter and Gerken, 2006 Jetter H.-C., Gerken, J., 2006. A simplified model of user experience for practical application. In: Mørch, A., Morgan, K., Bratteteig, T., Ghosh, G., Svanaes, D. (Eds.), NordiCHI 2006: the 4th Nordic conference on Human–computer interaction: changing roles. Oslo, Norway, ACM Press, pp. 106–11. Jindo and Hirasago, 1997 T. Jindo and K. Hirasago, Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 (2) (1997), pp. 105–114. Jordan, 2000 P. Jordan, Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors, Taylor and Francis, London (2000). Kahn et al., 2006 K. Kahn, G. Barczak and R. Moss, Perspective: establishing an NPD best practices framework, Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (2) (2006), pp. 106–116. Karat and Karat, 2003 J. Karat and C.M. Karat, The evolution of user-centered focus in the human–computer interaction field, IBM Systems Journal 42 (4) (2003), pp. 532–541. Karlsson et al., 2003 B. Karlsson, N. Aronsson and K. Svensson, Using semantic environment description as a tool to evaluate car interiors, Ergonomics 46 (13–14) (2003), pp. 1408–1422. Kawazu et al., 2000 Kawazu, K., Kai, M., Koike, K., Imada, M., Yasuda, K., 2000. Study of favorable feel paint – quantifying the sense of touch for painted panels. In: SAE 2000 World Congress, March 6–9 Detroit, Michigan, 2000-01-1362. Khalid and Helander, 2004 H.M. Khalid and M.G. Helander, A framework for affective customer needs in product design, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (1) (2004), pp. 27–42. Krippendorff, 2004a K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (second ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. (2004). Krippendorff, 2004b K. Krippendorff, Intrinsic motivation and human-centred design, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (1) (2004), pp. 43–72. Kumar and Whitney, 2007 V. Kumar and P. Whitney, Daily life, not markets: customer-centered design, Journal of Business Strategy 28 (4) (2007), pp. 46–58. Langerak et al., 2008 F. Langerak, E.J. Hultink and A. Griffin, Exploring mediating and moderating influences on the links among cycle time, proficiency in entry timing, and new product profitability, Journal of Product Innovation Management 25 (4) (2008), pp. 370–385. Leonard and Rayport, 1997 D. Leonard and J. Rayport, Spark innovation through empathic design, Harvard Business Review 75 (6) (1997), pp. 102–113. Light, 2006 A. Light, Adding method to meaning: a technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology, Behaviour and Information Technology 25 (2) (2006), pp. 175–187. MacDonald, 2001 A.S. MacDonald, Aesthetic intelligence: optimizing user-centred design, Journal of Engineering Design 12 (1) (2001), pp. 37–45. Mauter and Katzki, 2003 G. Mauter and S. Katzki, The Application of Operational Haptics in Automotive Engineering, Touch Briefings, London (2003) Available from: http://www.touchbriefings.com/cdps/cditem.cfm?cid = 6&nid = 11 (accessed 15.07.08). McLoone, 2003 H. McLoone, Touchable objects: attributes applied to the design of computer input devices, Ergonomics 46 (13–14) (2003), pp. 1320–1331. Moore, 1974 T.G. Moore, Tactile and kinaesthetic aspects of push-buttons, Applied Ergonomics 5 (2) (1974), pp. 66–71. Nagamachi, 2002 M. Nagamachi, Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development, Applied Ergonomics 33 (3) (2002), pp. 289–294. Osgood et al., 1957 C. Osgood, G. Suci and P. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957). Robinson and Min, 2002 W.T. Robinson and S. Min, Is the first to market the first to fail? Empirical evidence for industrial goods businesses, Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1) (2002), pp. 120–128. Silverman, 2006 D. Silverman, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction (third ed.), SAGE Publications, London; Thousand Oaks, Calif (2006). Stanney et al., 1997 K. Stanney, J. Maxey and G. Salvendy, Socially-centered Design. In: G. Salvendy, Editor, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley, New York (1997), pp. 637–656. Stevens, 2002 J. Stevens, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (fourth ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2002). Stone and Sidel, 2004 H. Stone and J. Sidel, Sensory Evaluation Practices (third ed.), Elsevier Academic Press, London (2004). Tiger, 2000 L. Tiger, The Pursuit of Pleasure, Transaction Publishers (2000). VCA, 2001 VCA, 2001. European Type Approval for Automotive Systems and Components (Revision 7). Bristol, UK, Vehicle Certification Agency, VCA004. Veryzer and de Mozota, 2005 R. Veryzer and B. de Mozota, The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: an examination of fundamental relationships, Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (2) (2005), pp. 128–143. Wellings et al., 2008 T. Wellings, M.A. Williams and M. Pitts, Customer perception of switch-feel in luxury sports utility vehicles, Food Quality and Preference 19 (8) (2008), pp. 737–746. Williams and Kochhar, 2000 M. Williams and A. Kochhar, New product introduction practices in the British manufacturing industry, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B – Journal of Engineering Manufacture 214 (10) (2000), pp. 853–863. Yun et al., 2003 M.H. Yun, S. Han, S. Hong and J. Kim, Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design, Ergonomics 46 (13–14) (2003), pp. 1423–1440.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2150

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us