The Library

Quality of medication use in primary care - mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature

Tools

Garfield, Sara, Barber, Nick, Walley, Paul, Willson, Alan and Eliasson, Lina. (2009) Quality of medication use in primary care - mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Medicine, Vol.7 (Articl). ISSN 1741-7015

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Walley_Quality_medication.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (293Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-50

Abstract

Background: The UK, USA and the World Health Organization have identified improved patient safety in healthcare as a priority. Medication error has been identified as one of the most frequent forms of medical error and is associated with significant medical harm. Errors are the result of the systems that produce them. In industrial settings, a range of systematic techniques have been designed to reduce error and waste. The first stage of these processes is to map out the whole system and its reliability at each stage. However, to date, studies of medication error and solutions have concentrated on individual parts of the whole system. In this paper we wished to conduct a systematic review of the literature, in order to map out the medication system with its associated errors and failures in quality, to assess the strength of the evidence and to use approaches from quality management to identify ways in which the system could be made safer.
Methods: We mapped out the medicines management system in primary care in the UK. We conducted a systematic literature review in order to refine our map of the system and to establish the quality of the research and reliability of the system.
Results: The map demonstrated that the proportion of errors in the management system for medicines in primary care is very high. Several stages of the process had error rates of 50% or more: repeat prescribing reviews, interface prescribing and communication and patient adherence. When including the efficacy of the medicine in the system, the available evidence suggested that only between 4% and 21% of patients achieved the optimum benefit from their medication. Whilst there were some limitations in the evidence base, including the error rate measurement and the sampling strategies employed, there was sufficient information to indicate the ways in which the system could be improved, using management approaches. The first step to improving the overall quality would be routine monitoring of adherence, clinical effectiveness and hospital admissions.
Conclusion: By adopting the whole system approach from a management perspective we have found where failures in quality occur in medication use in primary care in the UK, and where weaknesses occur in the associated evidence base. Quality management approaches have allowed us to develop a coherent change and research agenda in order to tackle these, so far, fairly intractable problems.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

World Health Organization, Medication errors -- Research, Primary care (Medicine) -- Great Britain, Quality control -- Great Britain

Journal or Publication Title:

BMC Medicine

Publisher:

BioMed Central Ltd.

ISSN:

1741-7015

Official Date:

21 September 2009

Dates:

Date	Event
21 September 2009	Published

Volume:

Vol.7

Number:

Articl

Identification Number:

10.1186/1741-7015-7-50

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Wales. National Leadership and Innovation Agency for Healthcare (NLIAH)

References:

1. Department of Health: An organisation with a memory. Report of an
expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS London: The
Stationery Office; 2000.
2. Department of Health: Building a safer NHS for patients: improving medication
safety. A report by the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer London: The
Stationery Office; 2004.
3. Institute of Medicine: To err is human: Building a safer health system.
Report of the Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America Washington:
National Academy Press; 2000.
4. World Health Organization: Quality of care: patient safety. Report by the
Secretariat Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
5. Department of Health: Pharmacy in England. Building on strengths-delivering
the future London: The Stationary Office; 2008.
6. Department of Health: Design for safety. A system-wide design-led
approach to tackling patient safety in the NHS London: Department of
Health; 2003.
7. National Institute of Clinical Excellence: Technical patient safety solutions
for medicines reconciliation on admission of adults to hospital: Guidance
London: NICE; 2007.
8. Institute of Healthcare Improvement: Getting started kit: Prevent
adverse drug events (medication reconciliation). How-to guide Massachusetts:
Institute of Healthcare Improvement; 2007.
9. Royal S, Smeaton L, Avery AJ, Hurwitz B, Sheikh A: Interventions
in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events
and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qual Safe Health Care 2006, 15:23-31.
10. Spear S: Fixing healthcare from the inside. Harvard Business Rev
2005, 83:78-91.
11. Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J: Ten key lessons for quality
improvement during healthcare. In New strategies for Quality
improvement San Francisco: Jossey-bass; 1990:157.
12. Proudlove N, Moxham C, Boaden R: Lessons for Lean in Healthcare
from Using Six Sigma in the NHS . Public Money Management
2008, 28(1):27-34.
13. Taner MT, Sezen B, Antony J: An overview of six sigma applications
in healthcare industry. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2007,
20:329-340.
14. Esimai : Lean Six Sigma reduces medication errors. Quality
Progress 2005, 38:51-57.
15. Al-Shaqha WMS, Zairi M: Reengineering pharmaceutical care:
towards a patient-focused care approach. Int J Health Care Qual
Assur 2000, 13:208-217.
16. Franklin BD, O'Grady K, Paschalides C, Uley M, Gallavin S, Jacklin A,
Barber N: Providing feedback to hospital doctors about prescribing
errors: a pilot study. Pharm World Sci 2007, 29:213-220.
17. Rother M, Shook J: Learning to see: value-stream mapping to create value
and eliminate muda Massachusetts: The Lean Enterprise Institution;
2003.
18. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care: Medicines adherence
Involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting
adherence London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence;
2009.
19. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X: Interventions
for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 2008:CD000011.
20. Bicheno J: The New Lean Toolbox Buckingham: PICSIE Books; 2004.
21. Shah SNH, Aslam M, Avery AJ: A survey of prescription errors in
general practice. Pharmaceutical J 2001, 267:860-862.
22. Jones I, Britten N: Why do some patients not cash their prescriptions?
Br J Gen Pract 1998, 48:903-905.
23. Beardon PHG, McGilchrist MM, McKendrick AD, McDevitt DG, Mac-
Donald TM: Primary non-compliance with prescribed medication
in primary care. Br Med J 1993, 307:846-848.
24. Dean Franklin B, O'Grady K: Dispensing errors in community
pharmacy: frequency, clinical significance and potential
impact of authentication at the point of dispensing. Int J Pharmacy
Practice 2007, 15:273-281.
25. Howard RL, Avery AJ, Howard PD, Partridge M: Investigation into
the reasons for preventable drug related admissions to a
medical admissions unit: observational study. Qual Safe Health
Care 2003, 12:280-285.
26. Pirohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, Farrar
K, Park BK, Breckenridge AM: Adverse drug reactions as
cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820
patients. Br Med J 2004, 329:15-19.
27. Green CF, Mottram DR, Rowe PH, Pirmohamed M: Adverse drug
reactions as a cause of admission to an acute medical unit: a
pilot study. J Clin Pharm Ther 25:355-361.
28. Zermansky AG: Who controls repeats. Br J Gen Pract 1996,
46:643-647.
29. Jani YH, Ghaleb MA, Marks SD, Cope J, Barber N, Wong ICK: Electronic
prescribing reduced prescribing errors in a pediatric
renal outpatient clinic. J Pediat 2008, 152:214-218.
30. Collins DJ, Nickless GD, Green CF: Medication histories; does
anyone know what medicines a patient should be taking? Int
J Pharmacy Practice 2004, 12:173-178.
31. Hippisley-Cox JH, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland
C, Hapgood R, Horsfield P, Teasdale S, Johnson C: The electronic
patient record in primary care- regression or
progression? A cross sectional study. Br Med J 2003,
236:1439-1443.
32. Manday A, Kelly B, Forrester JWE, Timoney A, McGovern E: Do general
practitioners and community pharmacists want information
on the reasons for drug therapy changes
implemented by secondary care? Br J Gen Pract 1997,
47:563-566.
33. Brookes K, Scott MG, McConnell JB: The benefits of a hospital
based community services liason pharmacy. Pharm World Sci
2000, 22:33-38.
34. Ahmed S, Harding J: Investigating the procedures, drawbacks
and implications of seamless primary-secondary care. Quality
in Primary Care 2005, 12:51-55.
35. Rees S, Thomas P, Shetty A, Makinde K: Drug history errors in the
acute medical assessment unit quantified by the use of the
NPSA classification. Pharmaceutical J 2007, 279:469-471.
36. Pickrell L, Duggan C, Dhillon S: From hospital admission to discharge:
an exploratory study to evaluate seamless care. Pharmaceutical
J 2001, 267:650-653.
37. Morcos S, Francis S-A, Duggan C: Where are the weakest links?
A descriptive study of discrepancies in prescribing between
primary and secondary sectors of mental health service provision.
Psychiatric Bull 2002, 26:371-374.
38. Sagripanti M, Dean B, Barber N: An evaluation of the processrelated
medication risks for elective surgery patients from
pre-operative assessment to discharge. Int J Pharmacy Practice
2002, 10:161-170.
39. Franklin BD, O'Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N: The impact
of a closed-loop prescribing and administration system on
prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time. Qual
Safe Health Care 2007, 16:279-284.
40. Donyai P, O'Grady K, Jacklin A, Barber N, Franklin BD: The effects
of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing. Br J Clin
Pharmacol 2007, 65:230-237.
41. Barber N, Franklin BD, Cornford T, Klecun E, Savage I: Safer, faster,
better? Evaluating electronic prescribing. Report to the Patient Safety
Research Programme London: The Department of Health; 2006.
42. Tully MP, Parker D, Buchan I, McElduff P, Heathfield H, Rogers J,
Healthfield s, Latif S, Smith G, Eden M, Malik H, Cantrill J: Patient Safety
Research Programme Medication Errors 2: Pilot Study Volume 16. London:
The Department of Health; 2007:40-44.
43. Gethins B: Wise up to medication errors. Pharmacy in Practice
1996, 6:323-328.
44. Olsen S, Neale G, Schwab K, Psalia B, Patel T, Chapman EJ, Vincent
C: Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect
adverse events and potential adverse events: incident
reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time
review may all have a place. Qual Safe Health Care 2007,
16:40-44.
45. Duggan C, Bates I, Hough J: Discrepancies in prescribing. Where
do they occur? Pharmaceutical J 1996, 256:65-67.
46. Duggan C, Feldman R, Hough J, Bates I: Reducing adverse prescribing
discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Pharmacy
Practice 1998, 6:77-82.
47. Smith L, McGowan L, Moss-Barclay C, Wheater J, Knass D, Chrystyn
H: An investigation of hospital generated pharmaceutical
care when patients are discharged from hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1997, 44:163-165.
48. Hassey A, Gerrett D, Wilson A: A survey of validity and utility of
electronic patient records in a general practice. Br Med J 2001,
322:1401-1405.
49. Jordon K, Porcheret M, Croft P: Quality of morbidity coding in
general practice computerized medical records: a systematic
review. Fam Pract 2004, 21:396-412.
50. Natarajan R: Transferring best practices to healthcare: opportunities
and challenges. TQM Magazine 2006, 18:572-582.
51. Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R, Betts A: Operations and Process Management
New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2006.
52. Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plsek PE: Statistical process control as a
tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Safe
Health Care 2003, 12:458-464.