Lillywhite, Robert, Collier, Rosemary and Pole, J.. (2009) Assessing the costs and benefits of agricultural production using an ecosystem approach. Aspects of Applied Biology, Vol.95 . pp. 39-44. ISSN 0265-1491

Preview	PDF (Article Main Text) WRAP_Lillywhite__0380313-hr-261009-lillywhite.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (414Kb)
	PDF (Author Statement) WRAP_Lillywhite_statement_re_pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (15Kb)

Abstract

Integrated Farm Management (IFM) is seen as one way for agriculture to contribute towards the UKs challenging national targets for climate change, pollution, biodiversity and other environmental factors. Whilst it is clear that IFM and associated assurance schemes have a role in food quality and enhancement of the environment, they fail to address a number of issues. In particular, they fail to take sufficient account of ‘impact’ and ‘outcome’. In contrast, the relatively new concept of an ecosystem approach does consider these and there is extensive synergy between this approach and IFM. This is pertinent because the UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is taking steps to embed an ecosystem approach in policy-making and delivery. This paper sets out to explore the links between IFM and an ecosystem approach and introduces a simple matrix to show how an ecosystem approach might be used to assess the outcome of IFM practices. Limited use of an ecosystem approach suggests that this type of methodology could deliver useful results for IFM. However, it should be used as a decision-support tool rather than a decision-maker. The advantage of using an ecosystem approach for assessing the impact of IFM is that it provides a holistic assessment of land management strategies, rather than focusing on either cropping, or environmental management, alone. However, the values assigned to individual parameters are generally based on expert opinion and, as such, are open to interpretation. Indeed, an ecosystem approach should be interdisciplinary, utilising the knowledge and expertise of a range of stakeholders. Whilst the development of an ecosystem approach for use within an agricultural setting shows promise, it is still in its infancy. There is a need for much discussion, between many disciplines, before it becomes accepted practice.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Integrated agricultural systems -- Great Britain, Agricultural productivity -- Great Britain, Ecosystem services -- Great Britain, Climatic changes -- Environmental aspects
Journal or Publication Title:	Aspects of Applied Biology
Publisher:	Association of Applied Biologists
ISSN:	0265-1491
Date:	2009
Volume:	Vol.95
Page Range:	pp. 39-44
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Grant number:	AC0308 (DEFRA), IF0127 (DEFRA)
References:	Assured Produce. Assured Produce Scheme. www.assuredproduce.co.uk/ap. Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2006. What Are Ecosystem Services? Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future DP 06-02. 26 pp. Cook S K, Collier R, Clarke J H, Lillywhite R D. 2009. Contribution of integrated crop management practices to Defra objectives. Aspects of Applied Biology 93, Integrated Agricultural systems: Methodologies, modelling and measuring, pp. 131−138. Defra. 2007a. Securing a healthy natural environment: an action plan for embedding an ecosystems approach. www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/natural-environ/eco-actionplan.htm (Accessed 10 August 2009). Defra. 2007b. An Introductory Guide to Valuing Ecosystem services. 68 pp. Defra. 2008a. Ecosystem services for climate change adaptation in agricultural land management. Defra Final Report Project AC0308. Defra. 2008b. Ensuring the UK’s Food Security in a Changing World. A Defra Discussion Paper. July 2008. 32 pp. Defra. 2009. Contribution of integrated crop management practices to Defra objectives. Final report of Defra Project IFO127. Garstang J R, Harris D, Bailey S, Shea L, Young J, Chapple D, Walker A, Davies O, Chambers J, Merrell B. 2003. A review of research papers, reports and other publications on Integrated Farm Management. London: Defra. 131 pp. GLOBALGAP. www.globalgap.org. Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Cheshire D. 2006. Defining and Identifying Environmental Limits for Sustainable Development. A Scoping Study. Final Overview Report to Defra, Project Code NR0102. 188 pp. H M Treasury. 2007. PAS Delivery Agreement 28. www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pbr_csr07_psa -28.pdf (Accessed 10 August 2009) LEAF. 2009. Linking environment and farming. www.leafuk.org/leafuk/ (Accessed 1 August 2009). MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. www.millenniumassessment.org/en/-Global. aspx. Marks & Spencer. Assured produce ‘Farm to Fork’. www.marksandspencer.com Natural England. 2009. Draft policy on food security and the environment. 16 pp. http://www. naturalengland.org.uk/Images/food-security_tcm6-12252.pdf O’Gorman S, Bann C. 2008. Valuing England’s Terrestrial Ecosystem Services. A report to Defra (NR0108). Swales V, Woods A. 2008. Rising to the land-use challenge: issues for policy-makers. Relu Land-use Policy Analysts Discussion Paper 8 September 2008. 17 pp. (www.relu.ac.uk/about/ Challenge%20Paper%20consultdoc%20060908.pdf). Tesco. Nature’s Choice. www.tescofarming.com/tnc.asp Tzilivakis J, Lewis K A. 2007. A preliminary review of integrated farming standards and food eco-labelling. Final Report Defra project IF0131. 94 pp. University of Hertfordshire.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2185

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item