Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Not just a "second order" problem in a wider economic crisis: systemic challenges for the global trading system

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Higgott, Richard A.. (2009) Not just a "second order" problem in a wider economic crisis: systemic challenges for the global trading system. Business and Politics, Vol.11 (No.3). Article 5. ISSN 1469-3569

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Higgott_second_order.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (309Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1260

Abstract

Reform of the multilateral trade regime is not simply a second order problem within a wider economic crisis. The completion of the Doha Round may be a second order question but the global trade regime faces a series of broader systemic challenges beyond the completion of the current negotiations. This paper identifies five challenges: (i) a marked reduction in popular support for open markets in major OECD countries; (ii) the stalling of a transition from one global economic equilibrium to another; (iii) a lack of clarity and agreement on the agenda and objectives for the WTO as we move deeper into the 21st century; (iv) the demand for fairness and justice in the governance of the WTO—the 'legitimacy' question and (v) the rise of regional preferentialism as a challenge to multilateralism. Failure to address these challenges will represent not only a fundamental question for the future of the WTO as the guarantor of the norms and rules of the global trade regime specifically, but also the ability to establish greater coherence in global economic governance overall when its need is arguably greater than at any time since the depression years of the 20th century inter-war period.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
J Political Science > JZ International relations
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): World Trade Organization, Doha Development Agenda (2001- ) , Commercial policy, International economic relations, International trade
Journal or Publication Title: Business and Politics
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
ISSN: 1469-3569
Date: October 2009
Volume: Vol.11
Number: No.3
Page Range: Article 5
Identification Number: 10.2202/1469-3569.1260
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6), BMW Foundation Herbert Quandt (BMWFHQ)
References: Albin, Cecilia. 2008. ‘Using Negotiation to Promote Legitimacy: An Assessment of Proposals for Reforming the WTO’. International Affairs 84 (4): 757-775. Baldwin, Richard. 2006. ‘Mulilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’. The World Economy 29 (11): 1451-1518. Baldwin, Richard, Evenett, Simon and Low, Patrick. 2007. ‘Beyond Tariffs: Multilaterising Deeper RTA Commitments’. Multilateralizing Regionalism, Geneva, 10-12 September 2007, at http://www.wto.org/english/tratope/regione/consep07e/Baldwin_evenett_low_e.p df Baldwin, Richard and Evenett, Simon. eds. 2009. The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism, and the crisis: Recommendations for the G2. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Basu, Praesenjit et al. 2005. India as a New Global Leader, London: The Foreign Policy Centre. Bhagwati, Jagdish and Kreuger, Ann. 1995. The Dangerous Drift to Preferential Trade Agreements. Washington DC: The American Enterprise Institute Press. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1998. Protectionism. MIT Press. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2004. In Defence of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press. Blinder, Leonard. 2007. ‘How Many US Jobs Might Be Offshoreable?’ Brussels: CEPS Working Paper 142. Breslin, Shaun. 2007. China and the Global Political Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Capling, Anne. 2005. All the way with the US: Australia, United States and Free Trade. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. Desker, Barry. 2004 ‘In Defence of PTAs: From Purity to Pragmatism in Southeast Asia’. The Pacific Review 17 (1): 3-26. Dieter, Heribert and Higgott, Richard. 2003. ‘Exploring Alternative Theories of Economic Regionalism: From Trade to Finance in Asian Co-operation’. Review of International Political Economy 10 (3): 430-54. Evenett, Simon. 2008. ‘Getting Over Those Doha Blues’, Geneva. The Graduate Institute. VoxEU.Org Evenett, Simon. 2009. ‘No turning back: lock in 20 years of reform at the WTO’. In What World Leaders Must Do to Halt the Spread of Protectionism, edited by Baldwin, Richard and Evenett, Simon. Geneva: The Graduate Institute. A VoxEU.Org. Evenett, Simon. 2009. ‘Aid for Trade and the “Missing Middle” of the World Trade Organisation’. Global Governance 15 (3): 359-74. Gallagher, Peter and Stoler, A. 2009. ‘Critical Mass as an Alternative Framework for Multilateral Trade Negotiations’. Global Governance 15 (3): 375-92. Hoekman, Bernard. 2005. ‘Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’. Journal of International Economic Law 8 (2): 405-24 Higgott, Richard and Erman, Eva. 2009. ‘Deliberative Global Governance and the Question for Legitimacy: What Can We Learn from the WTO?’ Review of International Studies. forthcoming. Ikenberry, John, G. 2000. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Rewstraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Keohane, Robert, O. 2005. ‘The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism’ Working Paper No. 9. Warwick University: EU FP6 Network of Excellence on Global Governance, Regionalisation and Regulation: The Role of the EU (GARNET) at www.garnet-eu.org Lamy, Pascal. 2009. The Role of the Multilateral trade System in the Current Economic Crisis, Public Lecture. University of Warwick, July 15, 2009: 1-13. Lawrence, Robert, Z. (n.d) ‘China and the Multilateral Trading System’, http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~RLawrence/Lawrence%20China%20and%20the%2 0Multilateral%20Trading%20System.pdf. Narlikar, Amrita. 2005. A Short History of the WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Narlikar, Amrita and Tussie, Diana. 2004. ‘The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial Meeting: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions’. The World Economy 27 (7): 947-66. Panagriya, Arvind. 2008. India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pomfret, Richard. 1997. Unequal Trade: The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford: Blackwells. Rothkopf, David. 2008. The Global Power Elite and the World they are Making. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux. Samuelson, Paul. 2004. ‘Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization’. Journal of Economic Perspective 18 (3) 2004: 135-146. Schiller, Robert. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Schiller, Robert. 2008. The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened and What to Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stern, Robert. M and Deardoff, Alan. 2006. ‘Globalization’s bystanders: Does trade liberalization hurt countries that do not participate?. World Development 34 (8): 1419-1429. Stone, Diane. ed. 2001. Banking on Knowledge: The Genesis of the Global Development Network. London: Routledge. Stone, Diane. ed. 2006. The World Bank and Governance: A Decade of Reform and Reaction. London: Routledge. Tussie, Diana. 2009. ‘Process DriveSrs in Trade Negotiations: The Role of Research in the Path to Grounding and Contextualising’. Global Governance 15 (3): 335-42. Warwick Commission. 2007. The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? University of Warwick, http://go.warwick.ac.uk/go/warwickcommission Wolf, Martin. 2004. Why Globalization Works. New Haven: Yale University Press. WTO. 2007. Annual Report. Geneva. World Trade Organization.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2212

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us