Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Accounting for the “railway mania” of 1845 - A great railway swindle?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bryer, Rob (1991) Accounting for the “railway mania” of 1845 - A great railway swindle? Accounting Organizations and Society, 16 (5-6). pp. 439-486. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(91)90038-G ISSN 0361-3682.

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90038-G

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper explores the functioning of accounting in the social, economic and political contexts surrounding the financing of the early U.K. railways. The conventional view of economic historians is that the early U.K. railways were financed by an irrational stock market “mania”, followed by the inevitable crash in which many of the initial investors were ruined. Here we explore an alternative explanation implied by a comment by Marx in volume 3, of Capital (1981), that these events were elements of a “great railway swindle” in which accounting was deeply implicated. Marx provides no direct support for his statement. However, the history of the early U.K. railways has been extensively researched. This work is re-examined to assess the a priori validity of the “swindle hypothesis”. Its acceptance would have important implications for accepted views of the nature of capitalism and accounting in the mid-nineteenth century. According to economic historians, the “mania” was a product of laissez faire capitalism. According to accounting historians, the notorious manipulations of railway accounts during and after the “mania” were the consequence of a lack of “generally accepted accounting principles”. However, according to the swindle hypothesis, the “mania” and its afterwath were the product of a rational and rapacious social hierarchy, for whom accounting was simply a tool to be manipulated. The paper concludes that while there is a need for more research, the hypothesis is sufficiently consistent with the evidence available to be firmly on the agenda of accounting history.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Journal or Publication Title: Accounting Organizations and Society
Publisher: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd.
ISSN: 0361-3682
Official Date: May 1991
Dates:
DateEvent
May 1991Published
20 May 2002Available
Volume: 16
Number: 5-6
Number of Pages: 48
Page Range: pp. 439-486
DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(91)90038-G
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us