The Library
Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? : the MINT incentive study
Tools
Gates, Simon, Williams, Mark A., Withers, Emma J., Williamson, Esther M., Mt-Isa, Shahrul and Lamb, S. E. (Sallie E.) (2009) Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? : the MINT incentive study. Trials, Vol.10 . p. 44. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-44 ISSN 1745-6215.
|
PDF
WRAP_Gates_monetary_incentive.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (264Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-44
Abstract
Background: Sending a monetary incentive with postal questionnaires has been found to improve
the proportion of responders, in research in non-healthcare settings. However, there is little
research on use of incentives to improve follow-up rates in clinical trials, and existing studies are
inconclusive. We conducted a randomised trial among participants in the Managing Injuries of the
Neck Trial (MINT) to investigate the effects on the proportion of questionnaires returned and
overall non-response of sending a £5 gift voucher with a follow-up questionnaire.
Methods: Participants in MINT were randomised to receive either: (a) a £5 gift voucher (incentive
group) or (b) no gift voucher (no incentive group), with their 4 month or 8 month follow-up
questionnaire. We recorded, for each group, the number of questionnaires returned, the number
returned without any chasing from the study office, the overall number of non-responders (after
all chasing efforts by the study office), and the costs of following up each group.
Results: 2144 participants were randomised, 1070 to the incentive group and 1074 to the no
incentive group. The proportion of questionnaires returned (RR 1.10 (95% CI 1.05, 1.16)) and the
proportion returned without chasing (RR 1.14 (95% CI 1.05, 1.24) were higher in the incentive
group, and the overall non-response rate was lower (RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.87)). Adjustment for
injury severity and hospital of recruitment to MINT made no difference to these results, and there
were no differences in results between the 4-month and 8-month follow up questionnaires.
Analysis of costs suggested a cost of £67.29 per additional questionnaire returned.
Conclusion: Monetary incentives may be an effective way to increase the proportion of postal
questionnaires returned and minimise loss to follow-up in clinical trials.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) H Social Sciences > HA Statistics |
||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Medical care surveys -- Response rate, Mail surveys -- Response rate, Nonresponse (Statistics), Incentive (Psychology), Clinical medicine -- Research | ||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Trials | ||||
Publisher: | BioMed Central Ltd. | ||||
ISSN: | 1745-6215 | ||||
Official Date: | 22 June 2009 | ||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Volume: | Vol.10 | ||||
Number of Pages: | 7 | ||||
Page Range: | p. 44 | ||||
DOI: | 10.1186/1745-6215-10-44 | ||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||
Funder: | NHS R & D HTA Programme (Great Britain) (HTA) | ||||
Grant number: | 02/35/02 (HTA) |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year