Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? : the MINT incentive study

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gates, Simon, Williams, Mark A., Withers, Emma J., Williamson, Esther M., Mt-Isa, Shahrul and Lamb, S. E. (Sallie E.) (2009) Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? : the MINT incentive study. Trials, Vol.10 . p. 44. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-44

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Gates_monetary_incentive.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (264Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-44

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background: Sending a monetary incentive with postal questionnaires has been found to improve
the proportion of responders, in research in non-healthcare settings. However, there is little
research on use of incentives to improve follow-up rates in clinical trials, and existing studies are
inconclusive. We conducted a randomised trial among participants in the Managing Injuries of the
Neck Trial (MINT) to investigate the effects on the proportion of questionnaires returned and
overall non-response of sending a £5 gift voucher with a follow-up questionnaire.
Methods: Participants in MINT were randomised to receive either: (a) a £5 gift voucher (incentive
group) or (b) no gift voucher (no incentive group), with their 4 month or 8 month follow-up
questionnaire. We recorded, for each group, the number of questionnaires returned, the number
returned without any chasing from the study office, the overall number of non-responders (after
all chasing efforts by the study office), and the costs of following up each group.
Results: 2144 participants were randomised, 1070 to the incentive group and 1074 to the no
incentive group. The proportion of questionnaires returned (RR 1.10 (95% CI 1.05, 1.16)) and the
proportion returned without chasing (RR 1.14 (95% CI 1.05, 1.24) were higher in the incentive
group, and the overall non-response rate was lower (RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.87)). Adjustment for
injury severity and hospital of recruitment to MINT made no difference to these results, and there
were no differences in results between the 4-month and 8-month follow up questionnaires.
Analysis of costs suggested a cost of £67.29 per additional questionnaire returned.
Conclusion: Monetary incentives may be an effective way to increase the proportion of postal
questionnaires returned and minimise loss to follow-up in clinical trials.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Medical care surveys -- Response rate, Mail surveys -- Response rate, Nonresponse (Statistics), Incentive (Psychology), Clinical medicine -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Trials
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1745-6215
Official Date: 22 June 2009
Dates:
DateEvent
22 June 2009Published
Volume: Vol.10
Number of Pages: 7
Page Range: p. 44
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-44
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: NHS R & D HTA Programme (Great Britain) (HTA)
Grant number: 02/35/02 (HTA)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us