The Library

The effects of day and night temperature on Chrysanthemum morifolium: investigating the safe limits for temperature integration

Tools

Adams, S. R. (Steven R.), Valdes, V. M. and Fuller, D. (Debbie). (2009) The effects of day and night temperature on Chrysanthemum morifolium: investigating the safe limits for temperature integration. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, Vol.84 (No.6). pp. 604-608. ISSN 1462-0316

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Adams_0380313-hr-191109-chysanthemum__-_jhsb_revised_submission.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (107Kb)

Official URL: http://www.jhortscib.org/Vol84/84_6/6.htm

Abstract

The impact of day and night temperatures on pot chrysanthemum (cultivars ‘Covington’ and ‘Irvine’) was assessed by exposing cuttings, stuck in weeks 39, 44, and 49, to different temperature regimes in short-days. Glasshouse heating setpoints of 12°, 15°, 18°, and 21°C, were used during the day, with venting at 2°C above these set-points. Night temperatures were then automatically manipulated to ensure that all of the treatments achieved similar mean diurnal temperatures. Plants were grown according to commercial practice and the experiment was repeated over 2 years. Increasing the day temperature from approx. 19°C to 21°C, and compensating by reducing the night temperature, did not have a significant impact on flowering time, although plant height was increased.This suggests that a temperature integration strategy which involves higher vent temperatures, and exploiting solar gain to give higher than normal day temperatures, should have minimal impact on crop scheduling. However, lowering the day-time temperature to approx. 16°C, and compensating with a warmer night, delayed flowering by up to 2 weeks. Therefore, a strategy whereby, in Winter, more heat is added at night under a thermally-efficient blackout screen may result in flowering delays.Transfers between the temperature regimes showed that the flowering delays were proportional to the amount of time spent in a low day-time temperature regime. Plants flowered at the same time, irrespective of whether they were transferred on a 1-, 2-, or 4-week cycle.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Plants -- Effect of temperature on, Plants -- Effect of solar radiation on, Circadian rhythms, Crops -- Effect of temperature on
Journal or Publication Title:	Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Publisher:	Headley Brothers Ltd.
ISSN:	1462-0316
Official Date:	November 2009
Volume:	Vol.84
Number:	No.6
Page Range:	pp. 604-608
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Grant number:	HH3611SPC (DEFRA)
References:	ADAMS, S. R., PEARSON, S. and HADLEY, P. (1997). The effects of temperature, photoperiod and light integral on the time to flowering of pansy cv. Universal Violet (Viola � wittrockiana Gams.). Annals of Botany, 80, 107–112. ADAMS, S. R., PEARSON, S. and HADLEY, P. (1998). The effect of temperature on inflorescence initiation and subsequent development in chrysanthemum cv. ‘Snowdon’ (Chrysanthemum � morifolium Ramat.). Scientia Horticulturae, 77, 59–72. CATHEY, H. M. (1954). Chrysanthemum temperature study. C. The effect of night, day and mean temperature upon the flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 64, 499–502. CARVALHO, S. M. P. and HEUVELINK, E. (2001). Influence of greenhouse climate and plant density on external quality of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura): First steps towards a quality model. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 76, 249–258. CARVALHO, S. M. P., HEUVELINK, E., CASCAIS, R. and VAN KOOTEN, O. (2002). Effect of day and night temperature on internode and stem length in chrysanthemum: is everything explained by DIF? Annals of Botany, 90, 111–118. COCKSHULL, K. E. and HUGHES, A. P. (1972). Flower formation in Chrysanthemum morifolium: the influence of light level. Journal of Horticultural Science, 47, 113–127. COCKSHULL, K. E., HAND, D. W. and LANGTON, F. A. (1981). The effects of day and night temperature on flower initiation and development in chrysanthemum. Acta Horticulturae, 125, 101–110. DE JONG, J. (1978). Selection for wide temperature adaptation in Chrysanthemum morifolium (Ramat.) Hemsl. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 26, 110–118. DE JONG, J. (1989). Analysis of components controlling early flowering of chrysanthemum at low temperature. Euphytica, 40, 121–126. DE LINT, P. J. A. L. and HEIJ, G. (1987). Effects of day and night temperature on growth and flowering of chrysanthemum. Acta Horticulturae, 197, 53–61. HIDÉN,C. and LARSEN, R.U. (1994). Predicting flower development in greenhouse grown chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae, 58, 123–138. KARLSSON, M. G., HEINS, R. D., ERWIN, J. E. and BERGHAGE, R. D. (1989). Development rate during four phases of chrysanthemum growth as determined by preceding and prevailing temperatures. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 114, 234–240. LANGTON, F.A. and HORRIDGE, J. S. (2006).The effects of averaging sub- and supra-optimal temperatures on the flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 81, 335–340. LANGTON, F. A., CLARKE, I. P. and HAMER, P. J. C. (2003). Energysaving strategies. Grower, 139, 14–15. PEARSON, S., HADLEY, P. and WHELDON, A. E. (1993). A reanalysis of the effects of temperature and irradiance on time to flowering in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora). Journal of Horticultural Science, 68, 89–97. VAN DER PLOEG, A. and HEUVELINK, E. (2006). The influence of temperature on growth and development of chrysanthemum cultivars: a review. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 81, 174–182. WARREN, C. R. and DREYER, E. (2006). Temperature response of photosynthesis and internal conductance to CO2: results from two independent approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 3057–3067.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2268