Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A psychological approach to providing self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes : the diabetes manual

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sturt, Jackie, Taylor, Hafrun, Docherty, Andrea, Dale, Jeremy, 1958- and Taylor, Louise. (2006) A psychological approach to providing self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes : the diabetes manual. Biomed Central Fanily Practice, Vol.7 (No.70). ISSN 1471-2296

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Sturt_1471-2296-7-70.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (308Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11861471-2296-7-70

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were twofold (i) to develop the Diabetes Manual, a selfmanagement educational intervention aimed at improving biomedical and psychosocial outcomes (ii) to produce early phase evidence relating to validity and clinical feasibility to inform future research and systematic reviews. Methods: Using the UK Medical Research Council's complex intervention framework, the Diabetes Manual and associated self management interventions were developed through preclinical, and phase I evaluation phases guided by adult-learning and self-efficacy theories, clinical feasibility and health policy protocols. A qualitative needs assessment and an RCT contributed data to the pre-clinical phase. Phase I incorporated intervention development informed by the preclinical phase and a feasibility survey. Results: The pre-clinical and phase I studies resulted in the production in the Diabetes Manual programme for trial evaluation as delivered within routine primary care consultations. Conclusion: This complex intervention shows early feasibility and face validity for both diabetes health professionals and people with diabetes. Randomised trial will determine effectiveness against clinical and psychological outcomes. Further study of some component parts, delivered in alternative combinations, is recommended.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Diabetes -- Treatment, Diabetes -- Psychological aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Biomed Central Fanily Practice
Publisher: Biomed Central
ISSN: 1471-2296
Date: 27 November 2006
Volume: Vol.7
Number: No.70
Identification Number: 10.11861471-2296-7-70
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Diabetes UK, Lifescan Inc., Johnson & Johnson
References: 1. International Diabetes Foundation : International standards for diabetes education. 2003 [http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/Inter national%20standards.pdf ]. Accessed 12th October 2006 2. Finnish Diabetes Association: Development Programme for the Prevention and Care of Diabetes in Finland 2000-2010 Accessed 12th October 2006. 2006 [http://www.diabetes.fi/eng lish/programme/programme/chapter8.htm]. 3. Declaration of the Americas: Declaration of the Americas on Diabetes . . 4. Rutten GEHM, Verhoeven S, Heine RJ, De Grauw WJC, Cromme PVM, Reenders K, Van Ballegooie E, Wiersma TJ: . Huisarts en wetenschap/ Netherlands journal of general practice/family medicine 1999, 42(2):68-84. 5. Department of Health: The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London , Department of Health; 2001. 6. Department of Health: The National Service Framework for Diabetes Standards document. London , Department of Health; 2002. 7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guidance on the use of patient-education models for diabetes. In Technology Appraisal Volume 60. London , NHS; 2003. 8. Department of Health: Structured Patient Education in Diabetes: Report from the Patient Education Working Group. Edited by: Health D. London , Department of Health; 2005. 9. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Venkat Narayan KM: Effectiveness of selfmanagement training in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001, 24(3):561-587. 10. Rutten G: Diabetes patient education: time for a new era. Diabetic Medicine 2005, 22:671-673. 11. Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Lancet 2004, 363(9421):1589-1597. 12. Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Haywood P, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, Walters EH: Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002. 13. Rollnick S: Commentaries. Enthusiasm, quick fixes and premature controlled trials. Addiction 2001, 96:1769-1775. 14. Muhlhauser I, Berger M: Patient education – evaluation of a complex intervention. Diabetologia 2002, 45:1723-1733. 15. Meijel B, Ganel C, Swieten-Duijfjes B, MHF G: The development of evidence –based nursing interventions: methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004, 48(1):84-92. 16. Norris SL, Nichols JP, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, Isham G, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Garfield S, Briss P, Mcculloch D: The Effectivness of Disease and Case Management for People with Diabetes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002:15-38. 17. Steed L, Cooke D, Newman S: A Systematic review of psychosocial outcomes following education, self-management and psychological interventions in diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 54:5-15. 18. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, Gonzalez VM, Laurent MPH, Holman HR: Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management programme can improve health status whilst reducing hospitalisation. A randomised trial. Medical Care 1999, 37:5-14. 19. Rowlands G, Sims J, Kerry S: A lesson learnt: the importance of modelling in randomised controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care. Family Practice 2005, 22:132-139. 20. Medical Research Council: Medical Research Council framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health . 2000. 21. Bandura A: Self-efficacy theory: towards a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review 1977, 84:191-215. 22. Gillis AJ: Determinants of health promoting lifestyle; an integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1993, 18:545-553. 23. Conner M, Norman P: Health behaviour . In Comprehensive Clinical Psychology Edited by: Johnson DW, Johnson M. Oxford , Elsevier; 1998:p1-38. 24. Nigg CR: Multiple theories in health behaviour change: what can we learn? (Abstract). International Journal of Behavioural Medicine 2004, 11, supp:. 25. di Loreto D, Fanellli C, Lucidi P, Murdolo G, Cicco A, Parlanti N, Santeusanio F, Brunetti P, Feo P: Validation of a counselling strategy to promote the adoption and the maintenance of physical activity by type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 2003, 26:404-408. 26. Bijl JJ, Poelgeest-Eeltink A, Shortridge-Baggett L: The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999, 30:352-359. 27. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, LD G: The Third Version of the Diabetes Attitude Scale. Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition 1998, 21(9):1403-1407. 28. Van Der Ven N, Weinger K, Yi J, Pouwer F, Ader H, Van Der Ploeg H, Snoek F: The confidence in diabetes self-care scale: psychometric properties of a new measure of diabetes-specific selfefficacy in Dutch and US patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes care 2003, 26(3):713-718. 29. Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Barlow J, Hainsworth J: Supporting a curriculum for delivering type 2 diabetes patient self-management education: a patient needs assessment. Primary care research and development 2005, 6 :291-299. 30. Lewin B, Robertson IH, Cay EL, Irving JB, Campbell M: Effects of self-help post myocardial infarction rehabilitation on psychological adjustment and use of health services. The Lancet 1992, 339(8800):1036-1040. 31. Fauerbach JA, Bush DE, Thombs BD, McCann UD, Fogel J, Ziegelstein RC: Depression following acute myocardial infarction: A prospective relationship with ongoing health and function. Psychosomatics 2005, 46:355-361. 32. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ: The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2001, 24 :1069-1078. 33. Lin EHB, Katon W, Von Korff M, Rutter C, Simon GE, Oliver M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Bush T, B. Y: Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventative care. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:2154-2160. 34. Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE: Depression and poor glycemic control: a metaanalysis review of the literature. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:934-942. 35. Linden B: Evaluation of a home-based evaluation programme for patients recovering from acute MI. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 1995, 11:10-19. 36. O’Rourke A, S H: Psychological outcomes after myocardial infarction: evaluation of two approaches to rehabilitation. Psychology, Health and Medicine 1999, 4 :393-402. 37. Brannen J: Cardiac Rehabilitation, getting it right. Primary Health Care 2000, 10:25-28. 38. Dalal H, Evans P: Achieving national service standards for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention. British Medical Journal 2003, 326:481-484. 39. Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Farmer A, Dale J, Eldridge S: The Diabetes Manual trial protocol – a cluster randomized controlled trial of a self-management intervention for type 2 diabetes [ISRCTN06315411]. BMC Family Practice 2006, 7(45):. 40. Docherty A, Dale J: Patient experience of care, patient and health professional views on diabetes interventions and the findings of a telecare trial. Report to the Coventry and Warwickshire GP consortium. Coventry , University of Warwick; 2004. 41. Funnell MM, Anderson RM: Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clinical Diabetes 2004, 22 (3):123-127. 42. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R: Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. In Cochrane Library Oxford ; 2000. 43. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ: The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow up on patient-centred outcomes of diabetes care - a randomised controlled trial. Medical Care 2000, 28 :218-230. 44. Lewin K: Action Research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 1946, 2:34-36. 45. Kolb D: Experiential learning. New Jersey , Prentice Hall; 1984. 46. Sturt J: The implementation of self-efficacy theory into the health promotion work of a primary health care team: an action research approach. [Unpublished PhD thesis] . Volume PhD. Brunel University.; 1997. 47. Sturt J: Implementing theory into health promotion practice: an empowering approach. In Health and empowerment: research and practice Edited by: Kendall SA. London , Edward Arnold; 1998:p38-56. 48. Sturt J, Whitlock S, Hearnshaw H: Self-efficacy goal achievement (SEGA) diabetes consultations in primary care: contribution to development by the MRC framework for RCTs in complex interventions. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2006, 54(3):293-303. 49. Sturt J, Hearnshaw H: Measuring Outcomes: self-management, empowerment and self-efficacy. Diabetic Medicine 2003, 20 suppl 2:78. 50. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, Schwartz CE: Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995, 18:754-760. 51. Hardeman W, Sutton S, Griffin S, Johnston M, White A, Wareham N, Kinmonth AL: A Casual modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice 2005, 20(6):676-687.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/227

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us