Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The impact of contact tracing in clustered populations

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

House, Thomas A. and Keeling, Matthew James. (2010) The impact of contact tracing in clustered populations. PLoS Computational Biology, Vol.6 (No.3). Article no. e1000721. ISSN 1553-734X

[img] PDF
WRAP_House_Contact_chasing.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (520Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000721

Abstract

The tracing of potentially infectious contacts has become an important part of the control strategy for many infectious diseases, from early cases of novel infections to endemic sexually transmitted infections. Here, we make use of mathematical models to consider the case of partner notification for sexually transmitted infection, however these models are sufficiently simple to allow more general conclusions to be drawn. We show that, when contact network structure is considered in addition to contact tracing, standard “mass action” models are generally inadequate. To consider the impact of mutual contacts (specifically clustering) we develop an improvement to existing pairwise network models, which we use to demonstrate that ceteris paribus, clustering improves the efficacy of contact tracing for a large region of parameter space. This result is sometimes reversed, however, for the case of highly effective contact tracing. We also develop stochastic simulations for comparison, using simple re-wiring methods that allow the generation of appropriate comparator networks. In this way we contribute to the general theory of network-based interventions against infectious disease.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Communicable diseases -- Transmission -- Mathematical models, Sexually transmitted diseases -- Prevention, Vector control, Social networks -- Mathematical models
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher: Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1553-734X
Date: 26 March 2010
Volume: Vol.6
Number: No.3
Number of Pages: 9
Page Range: Article no. e1000721
Identification Number: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000721
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Wellcome Trust (London, England), Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC)
References: 1. Riley S, Fraser C, Donnelly CA, Ghani AC, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. (2003) Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science 300: 1961–6. 2. Lipsitch M, Cohen T, Cooper B, Robins JM, Ma S, et al. (2003) Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 300: 1966–70. 3. Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM (2001) Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature 413: 542–8. 4. Ferguson NM, Donnelly CA, Anderson RM (2001) The foot-and-mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions. Science 292: 1155–60. 5. Keeling MJ, Woolhouse ME, Shaw DJ, Matthews L, Chase-Topping M, et al. (2001) Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science 294: 813–7. 6. Tildesley MJ, Savill NJ, Shaw DJ, Deardon R, Brooks SP, et al. (2006) Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK. Nature 440: 83–6. 7. Riley S, Ferguson NM (2006) Smallpox transmission and control: Spatial dynamics in Great Britain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 12637–12642. 8. Hall IM, Egan JR, Barrass I, Gani R, Leach S (2007) Comparison of smallpox outbreak control strategies using a spatial metapopulation model. Epidemiol Infect 135: 12. 9. Clarke J (1998) Contact tracing for chlamydia: data on effectiveness. International journal of STD & AIDS 9: 187–91. 10. FitzGerald MR, Thirlby D, Bedford CA (1998) The outcome of contact tracing for gonorrhoea in the United Kingdom. International journal of STD & AIDS 9: 657–60. 11. Golden MR, Hogben M, Handsfield HH, Lawrence JSS, Potterat JJ, et al. (2003) Partner notification for HIV and STD in the United States: low coverage for gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, and HIV. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 30: 490–6. 12. Mu¨ ller J, Kretzschmar M, Dietz K (2000) Contact tracing in stochastic and deterministic epidemic models. Mathematical Biosciences 164: 39–64. 13. Huerta R, Tsimring LS (2002) Contact tracing and epidemics control in social networks. Physical Review E 66: 1–4. 14. Eames KTD, Keeling MJ (2003) Contact tracing and disease control. Proc Biol Sci 270: 2565–71. 15. Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR (2007) The effect of network mixing patterns on epidemic dynamics and the efficacy of disease contact tracing. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 5: 791–799. 16. Ball F, O’Neill PD, Pike J (2007) Stochastic epidemic models in structured populations featuring dynamic vaccination and isolation. Journal of Applied Probability 44: 571–585. 17. Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR (2005) Disease contact tracing in random and clustered networks. Proc Biol Sci 272: 1407–14. 18. Eames K, Keeling M (2002) Modeling dynamic and network heterogeneities in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 13330–13335. 19. Keeling MJ (1999) The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc Biol Sci 266: 859–67. 20. Volz E (2004) Random networks with tunable degree distribution and clustering. Physical Review E 70: 056115. 21. Serrano MA, Boguna M (2006) Percolation and epidemic thresholds in clustered networks. Physical Review Letters 97: 088701. 22. Eames KTD (2008) Modelling disease spread through random and regular contacts in clustered populations. Theoretical Population Biology 73: 104–11. 23. Newman MEJ (2009) Random graphs with clustering. Phys Rev Lett 103: 058701. 24. Miller JC (2009) Percolation and epidemics in random clustered networks. Phys Rev E 8: 020901(R). 25. Bansal S, Khandelwal S, Meyers LA (2009) Exploring biological network structure with clustered random networks. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 405. 26. Green DM, Kiss IZ (2010) Large-scale properties of clustered networks: Implications for disease dynamics. Journal of Biological Dynamics : In Press. 27. Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem-US: 22. 28. Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2007) Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals Princeton University Press. 29. House T, Davies G, Danon L, Keeling M (2009) A motif-based approach to network epidemics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2392

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us