Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Who escapes or remains a victim of bullying in primary school?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wolke, Dieter, Woods, Sarah and Samara, Muthanna. (2009) Who escapes or remains a victim of bullying in primary school? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol.27 (No.4). pp. 835-851. ISSN 0261-510X

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Wolke_0671038-241008-Wolke_et_al_in_press__Bullying_in_Primary_School-_BJDP_final_revision_Oct_08.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (221Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151008X383003

Abstract

The stability of both direct and relational victimisation and factors that contribute to remaining, escaping or becoming a victim of bullying were investigated. 663 children at baseline aged 6-9 (years 2-4) were interviewed about their bullying experiences and parents completed a behaviour and health measure. Children’s perception of the degree of social hierarchical structuring and social prominence in their class was determined by peer nominations. 432 children participated in the follow-up either 2 or 4 years after baseline aged 10-11 (year 6) and completed a bullying questionnaire. Relational victims and children from classes with a high hierarchical structure were more likely to have dropped out of the study compared to neutral children, and children from classes with a low hierarchical structure. Relative risk analyses indicated a two-fold increased risk of remaining a direct victim at follow-up, compared to a child not involved at baseline becoming a victim over the follow-up period. In contrast, relational victimisation increased but was not found to be stable. Logistic regression analyses revealed that being a girl, and receiving few positive peer nominations predicted remaining a direct victim. Becoming a relational victim at follow-up was predicted by a strong class hierarchy. The implications for future study of early recognition of likely long term victims and early preventative bullying initiatives are discussed.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions: Other > Institute of Advanced Study
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Bullying
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher: The British Psychological Society
ISSN: 0261-510X
Date: 2009
Volume: Vol.27
Number: No.4
Number of Pages: 17
Page Range: pp. 835-851
Identification Number: 10.1348/026151008X383003
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
Grant number: No.: R000222563
References: Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex Differences in Physical, Verbal, and Indirect Aggression: A Review of Recent Research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188. Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 18, 117-127. Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Burkowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765-785. Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-329. Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., Chau, C., Whitehand, C., & Amatya, K. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal links between friendship and peer victimization: Implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 461-466. Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87. Cairns, R. B., Perrin, J. E., & Cairns, B. D. (1985). Social structure and social cognition in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 339-355. Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Meerum-Terwogt, M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332-345. Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, X. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165-172. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570. Cote, S. M., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E. D., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 37-55. Cowie, H., & Olafsson, R. (2000). The role of peer support in helping the victims of bullying in a school with high levels of aggression. School Psychology International, 21, 79-95. Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2004). Cruel intentions on television and in real life: Can viewing indirect aggression increase viewers' subsequent indirect aggression? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 234-253. Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123-130. Crick, N., Ostrov, J., & Werner, N. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational aggression, physical aggression and children's social-psychological adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 127-138. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722. Dempsey, J., Fireman, G., & Wang, E. (2006). Transitioning Out of Peer Victimisation in School Children: Gender and Behavioral Characteristics. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28, 273-282. Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2006). Longitudinal association between submissive/nonassertive social behavior and different types of peer victimization. Violence and Victims, 21, 383-400. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345. Hawker, D. J. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-456. Hay, D., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 84. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitato, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94-101. Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039. Keating, C. F., & Heltman, K. R. (1994). Dominance and deception in children and adults: Are leaders the best misleaders? Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 312-321. Keltikangas-Jaervinen, L., Terav, T., & Pakaslahti, L. (1999). Moral reasoning among Estonian and Finnish adolescents: A comparison of collectivist and individual setting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 267-290. Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Wolke, D., Meyer, R., Overmeyer, S., Kaschnitz, W., et al. (2000). Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist. European Journal of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 271-276. Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. J., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children's peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72, 134-151. Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child development, 67, 1305-1317. Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Perusse, D., & Dionne, G. (2006). Do friendships and sibling relationships provide protection against peer victimization in a similar way? Social Development, 15, 373-393. Maes, S., Leventhal, H., & deRidder, D. T. D. (1996). Coping with chronic diseases. In M. Zeider & N. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 728). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (2003). Bullying in infant classes: Roles taken, stability and relationship to sociometric status. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 49, 453-469. Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., & Crick, N. R. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Association with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalising problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 187-203. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. In. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Olweus, D. (1999). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 28-48). London: Routledge. Ostrov, J. M., & Keating, C. F. (2004). Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13, 255-277. Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142-163. Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280. Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of Peer Aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814. Schäfer, M., & Albrecht, A. (2004). Tit for tat: Prevalence and stability of aggression and bullying in primary school settings. Psychologie in Erzichung und Unterricht, 51, 136-150. Schäfer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 323-335. Schuster, B. (1996). Rejection, exclusion, and harassment at work and in schools: an intergration of results from research on mobbing, bullying and peer rejection. European Psychologist, 1, 293-309. Smith, P. K., & Levan, S. (1995). Perceptions and experiences of bullying in younger pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 489-500. Smith, P. K., Shu, S., & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 440). New York: Guilford Press. Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., & Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims, continuing victim and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 565-581. Sourander, A., Helstela, L., Helenius, h., & Piha, J. (2000). Persistence of bullying from Childhood to adolescence - a longitudinal 8 year follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 873-881. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and 'theory of mind': A critique of the 'social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117-127. Warman, D. M., & Cohen, R. (2000). Stability of aggressive behaviours and children's peer relationships. Aggressive Behaviour, 26, 277-290. Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35 3-25. Wolke, D., Ratschinski, G., Ohrt, B., & Riegel, K. (1994). The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: An empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. European Journal of Pediatrics, 153, 906-915. Wolke, D., Söhne, B., Ohrt, B., & Riegel, K. (1995). Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. The Lancet, 345, 447. Wolke, D., Söhne, B., Riegel, K., Ohrt, B., & Österlund, K. (1998). An epidemiological study of sleeping problems and feeding experience of preterm and fullterm children in South Finland: Comparison to a South German population sample. Journal of Pediatrics, 133, 224-231. Wolke, D., & Stanford, K. (1999). Bullying in school children. In D. Messer & S. Millar (Eds.), Developmental Psychology (pp. 341-360). London: Arnold Publisher. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L. (2000). The association between direct and relational bullying and behaviour problems among primary school children. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 989-1002. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L. (2001a). Bullying involvement in primary school and common health problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 85, 197-201. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Schulz, H., & Stanford, K. (2001b). Bullying and victimisation of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673-696. Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2003). Does the content of anti-bullying policies inform us about the prevalence of direct and relational bullying behaviour in primary schools? Educational Psychology, 23, 381-401. Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2004). Direct and relational bullying experience among primary school children and academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 135-155.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/242

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us