The Library

Management interventions in dairy herds: exploring within herd uncertainty using an integrated Bayesian model

Tools

Green, M. J., Medley, Graham, Bradley, Andrew J. and Browne, W. J.. (2010) Management interventions in dairy herds: exploring within herd uncertainty using an integrated Bayesian model. Veterinary Research, Vol.41 (No.2). 10 pages. ISSN 0928-4249

PDF
WRAP_Medley_management_interventions.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (472Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres/2009070

Abstract

Knowledge of the efficacy of an intervention for disease control on an individual farm is essential to make good decisions on preventive healthcare, but the uncertainty in outcome associated with undertaking a specific control strategy has rarely been considered in veterinary medicine. The purpose of this research was to explore the uncertainty in change in disease incidence and financial benefit that could occur on different farms, when two effective farm management interventions are undertaken. Bovine mastitis was used as an example disease and the research was conducted using data from an intervention study as prior information within an integrated Bayesian simulation model. Predictions were made of the reduction in clinical mastitis within 30 days of calving on 52 farms, attributable to the application of two herd interventions previously reported as effective; rotation of dry cow pasture and differential dry cow therapy. Results indicated that there were important degrees of uncertainty in the predicted reduction in clinical mastitis for individual farms when either intervention was undertaken; the magnitude of the 95% credible intervals for reduced clinical mastitis incidence were substantial and of clinical relevance. The large uncertainty associated with the predicted reduction in clinical mastitis attributable to the interventions resulted in important variability in possible financial outcomes for each farm. The uncertainty in outcome associated with farm control measures illustrates the difficulty facing a veterinary clinician when making an on-farm decision and highlights the importance of iterative herd health procedures (continual evaluation, reassessment and adjusted interventions) to optimise health in an individual herd.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

S Agriculture > SF Animal culture

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Dairy cattle -- Diseases, Communicable diseases in animals -- Mathematical models, Uncertainty (Information theory), Bayesian statistical decision theory

Journal or Publication Title:

Veterinary Research

Publisher:

EDP Sciences

ISSN:

0928-4249

Official Date:

March 2010

Dates:

Date	Event
March 2010	Published

Volume:

Vol.41

Number:

No.2

Page Range:

10 pages

Identification Number:

10.1051/vetres/2009070

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Wellcome Trust (London, England), Milk Development Council (Great Britain) (MDC)

References:

[1] Barkema H.W., Schukken Y.H., Lam T.J., Beiboer
M.L., Benedictus G., Brand A., Management practices
associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis,
J. Dairy Sci. (1999) 82:1643–1654.
[2] Bradley A.J., Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease,
Vet. J. (2002) 164:116–128.
[3] Bradley A.J., Huxley J.N., Green M.J., A rational
approach to dry cow therapy II–Making logical
treatment decisions, In Pract. (2003) 25:12–17.
[4] Brand A., Noordhuizen J.P., Schukken Y.H., Herd
health and production management in dairy practice,
Wageningen Pers,Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1996.
[5] Chessa A.G., Dekkae R., van Vliet B., Steyerberg
E.W., Habbema J.D.F., Correlations in uncertainty
analysis for medical decision making: an application to
heart valve replacement, Med. Decis. Making (1999)
19:276–286.
[6] Esslemont R.J., Kossaibati M.A., DAISY Research
Report No. 5, University of Reading, UK, 2002.
[7] Goldstein H., Multilevel Statistical Models,
Edward Arnold, London, 1995.
[8] Green M.J., Bradley A.J., Medley G.F., Browne
W.J., Cow, farm and management factors during the
dry period that determine the rate of clinical mastitis
after calving, J. Dairy Sci (2007) 90:3764–3776.
[9] Green M.J., Leach K.A., Breen J.E., Green L.E.,
Bradley A.J., National intervention study of mastitis
control in dairy herds in England and Wales, Vet. Rec.
(2007) 160:287–293.
[10] Hastie R., Dawes R.A., Rational choice in an
uncertain world – The psychology of judgement and
decision making, Sage Publications Inc., California,
USA, 2001.
[11] O’Reilly K.M., Green M.J., Peeler E.J.,
Fitzpatrick J.L., Green L.E., Investigation of risk
factors for clinical mastitis in British dairy herds with
bulk milk somatic cell counts less than 150,000 cells/
ml, Vet. Rec (2006) 158:649–653.
[12] Peeler E.J., Green M.J., Fitzpatrick J.L., Morgan
K.L., Green L.E., Risk factors associated with clinical
mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds,
J. Dairy Sci. (2000) 83:2464–2472.
[13] SchukkenY.H., Erb H.N., Sears P.M., Smith R.D.,
Ecologic study of the risk factors for environmental
mastitis in cows, Am. J. Vet. Res. (1988) 49:766–769.
[14] Schukken Y.H., Grommers F.J., Van de Geer D.,
Erb H.N., Brand A., Risk factors for clinical mastitis in
herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 1. Data
and risk factors for all cases, J. Dairy Sci. (1990)
73:3463–3471.
[15] Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N., Bayesian approaches
to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in
complex cost-effectiveness modelling, Stat. Med.
(2003) 22:3687–7309.
[16] Spiegelhalter D.J., Abrams K.R., Myles J.P.,
Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and healthcare
evaluation, Statistics in practice, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, UK, 2004, pp. 305–347.
[17] Spiegelhalter D.J., Thomas A., Best N.,
WinBUGS Version 1.4.1, MRC Biostatistics Unit,
Cambridge, UK, 2004.