Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Money and happiness : rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Boyce, Christopher J., Brown, G. D. A. (Gordon D. A.) and Moore, Simon C.. (2010) Money and happiness : rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, Vol.21 (No.4). pp. 471-475. ISSN 0956-7976

[img] PDF
WRAP_Boyce_0553107-ps-060110-boycebrownmoore_psychscience.pdf - Draft Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (175Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362671

Abstract

Does money buy happiness, or does happiness come indirectly from the higher rank in society that money brings? Here we test a rank hypothesis, according to which people gain utility from the ranked position of their income within a comparison group. The rank hypothesis contrasts with traditional reference income hypotheses, which suggest utility from income depends on comparison to a social group reference norm. We find that the ranked position of an individual’s income predicts general life satisfaction, while absolute income and reference income have no effect. Furthermore, individuals weight upward comparisons more than downward comparisons. According to the rank hypothesis, income and utility are not directly linked: Increasing an individual’s income will only increase their utility if ranked position also increases and will necessarily reduce the utility of others who will lose rank.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Other > Institute of Advanced Study
Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Wealth -- Psychological aspects, Happiness, Quality of life, Social classes -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Psychological Science
Publisher: Sage
ISSN: 0956-7976
Date: April 2010
Volume: Vol.21
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 471-475
Identification Number: 10.1177/0956797610362671
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)
References: Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 2009-2042. Bilancini, E., & Boncinelli, L. (2007). Ordinal vs cardinal status: Two examples. University of Siena. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1359-1386. Brown, G. D. A., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J., & Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees' well-being? Industrial Relations, 47(3), 355-389. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95-144. Clark, A. E., Kristensen, N., & Westergard-Nielsen, N. (2009). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2-3), 519-527. Clark, A. E., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (in press). Effort and comparison income: Experimental and survey evidence Industrial & Labor Relations Review. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359-381. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior: Harvard University Press. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Davidson, R. J. (1990). The Duchenne smile - emotional expression and brain physiology - 2. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 342-353. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 997-1019. Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., et al. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318(5854), 1305-1308. Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one's community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 764-771. Howell, R. T., & Howell, C. J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 536-560. Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Honkanen, R., Viinamaki, H., Heikkila, K., Kaprio, J., & Koskenvuo, M. (2001). Life satisfaction and suicide: A 20-year follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(3), 433-439. Kornienko, T. (2004). A cognitive basis for cardinal utility. University of Stirling. Lepper, H. S. (1998). Use of other-reports to validate subjective well-being measures. Social Indicators Research, 44(3), 367-379. Lucas, R. E., & Schimmack, U. (2009). Income and well-being: How big is the gap between the rich and the poor? Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 75-78. Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963-1002. Mellers, B. A. (1986). Fair allocations of salaries and taxes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(1), 80-91. Moulton, B. R. (1990). An Illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334-338. Niedrich, R. W., Sharma, S., & Wedell, D. H. (2001). Reference price and price perceptions: A comparison of alternative models. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 339-354. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Powdthavee, N. (in press). How important is rank to individual perception of economic hierarchy? A within-community analysis. Journal of Economic Inequality. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being - the convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 318-342. Smith, R. H., Diener, E., & Wedell, D. H. (1989). Intrapersonal and socialcomparison determinants of happiness - a Range-Frequency analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 317-325. Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53(1), 1-26. Vandestadt, H., Kapteyn, A., & Vandegeer, S. (1985). The relativity of utility - evidence from panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(2), 179-187.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2554

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us