Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Household structure and infectious disease transmission

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

House, Thomas A. and Keeling, Matthew James. (2009) Household structure and infectious disease transmission. Epidemiology and Infection, Vol.137 (No.5). pp. 654-661. ISSN 0950-2688

[img] PDF
WRAP_House_household_structure.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (3460Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268808001416

Abstract

One of the central tenets of modern infectious disease epidemiology is that an understanding of heterogeneities, both in host demography and transmission, allows control to be efficiently optimized. Due to the strong interactions present, households are one of the most important heterogeneities to consider, both in terms of predicting epidemic severity and as a target for intervention. We consider these effects in the context of pandemic influenza in Great Britain, and find that there is significant local (ward-level) variation in the basic reproductive ratio, with some regions predicted to suffer 50% faster growth rate of infection than the mean. Childhood vaccination was shown to be highly effective at controlling an epidemic, generally outperforming random vaccination and substantially reducing the variation between regions; only nine out of over 10 000 wards did not obey this rule and these can be identified as demographically atypical regions. Since these benefits of childhood vaccination are a product of correlations between household size and number of dependent children in the household, our results are qualitatively robust for a variety of disease scenarios.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Households -- Great Britain, Communicable diseases -- Transmission -- Great Britain, Epidemiology -- Research, Vaccination of children -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: Epidemiology and Infection
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0950-2688
Date: May 2009
Volume: Vol.137
Number: No.5
Page Range: pp. 654-661
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0950268808001416
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder: Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6), Wellcome Trust (London, England)
Grant number: 513715 (SFP)
References: 1. Cauchemez S, et al. A Bayesian MCMC approach to study transmission of influenza: application to household longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23: 3469–3487. 2. Longini IM, et al. Estimating household and community transmission parameters for influenza. American Journal of Epidemiology 1982; 115: 736–751. 3. Hope-Simpson RE. Infectiousness of communicable diseases in the household. Lancet 1952; 2: 549–554. 4. Wu JT, et al. Reducing the impact of the next influenza pandemic using household-based public health interventions. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: 1532–1540. 5. Dodd PJ, Ferguson NM. Approximate disease dynamics in household-structured populations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2007; 4: 1103–1106. 6. Fraser C. Estimating individual and household reproduction numbers in an emerging epidemic. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: 1–12. 7. Ball F, O’Neill P. Stochastic epidemic models in structured populations featuring dynamic vaccination and isolation. Journal of Applied Probability 2007; 44: 571– 585. 8. Ball F, Lyne O. Optimal vaccination schemes for epidemics among a population of households, with application to variola minor in Brazil. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2006; 15: 481–497. 9. Ball F, Lyne O. Optimal vaccination policies for stochastic epidemics among a population of households. Mathematical Biosciences 2002; 177–178: 333–354. 10. Ferguson NM, et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 2006; 442: 448–452. 11. Viboud C, et al. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science 2006; 312: 447–451. 12. Germann T, et al. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2006; 103: 5935– 5940. 13. Chowell G, Nishiura H, Bettencourt LMA. Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 155–166. 14. Roberts MG, et al. A model for the spread and control of pandemic influenza in an isolated geographical region. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 325–330. 15. Ferguson N, et al. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast asia. Nature (London) 2005; 437: 209–214. 16. Gani R, et al. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 1355–1362. 17. Duerr H, et al. The impact of contact structure on infectious disease control : influenza and antiviral agents. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 1124–1132. 18. House T, Keeling MJ. Deterministic epidemic models with explicit household structure. Mathematical Biosciences 2008; 213: 29–39. 19. Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 20. Keeling MJ, Rohani P. Modelling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 21. Melegaro A, Gay N, Medley G. Estimating the transmission parameters of pneumococcal carriage in households. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 433–441. 22. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek J, Metz J. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 1990; 28: 365–382. 23. Dieckmann O, Heesterbeek JAP. Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2000. 24. Department of Health. Pandemic flu: a national framework for responding to an influenza pandemic. Department of Health, London, 2007. 25. Ball F, Mollison D, Scalia-Tomba G. Epidemics with two levels of mixing. Annals of Applied Probability 1997; 7: 46–89. 26. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. Contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1927; 115: 700– 721. 27. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census: Commissioned table C0844. ESRC/JISC Census Programme. 28. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census : Digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file]. 29. General Register Office for Scotland. 2001 census : Digitised boundary data (Scotland) [computer file].
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2566

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us