Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Understanding the exercise of agency within structural inequality: the case of personal debt

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Orton, Michael. (2009) Understanding the exercise of agency within structural inequality: the case of personal debt. Social Policy and Society, Vol.8 (No.4). pp. 487-498. ISSN 1474-7464

[img] PDF
WRAP_Orton_Understanding_exercise_agency.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (134Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746409990066

Abstract

This article contributes to debates about agency (meaning the behaviour of individuals) and structure, by drawing on empirical research into personal debt. Consideration of debt allows for debate about agency and structure beyond the narrow confines of welfare, and for the examination of agency in relation to citizens at different points in the broader socio-economic structure, not solely poor people. Based on the research findings, themselves grounded in interviewees' experience, the question of why two people in the same material circumstances will have different experiences becomes reframed as why two people whose exercise of agency is the same, face very different outcomes? It is argued that while the research supports a ‘both-and’ rather than ‘either-or’ approach to understanding agency and structure, a ‘both-and’ approach still does not fully capture the experience of interviewees. The key point is that the exercise of agency is overlaid onto structural inequality, and it is understanding the exercise of ‘agency within structure’ that is critical.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Employment Research
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Debt -- Research, Welfare economics -- Research, Agent (Philosophy) -- Research, Finance, Personal -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Social Policy and Society
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1474-7464
Date: October 2009
Volume: Vol.8
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 487-498
Identification Number: 10.1017/S1474746409990066
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
References: Balmer, N., Pleasence, P., Buck, A. and Walker, H. C. (2005), ‘Worried sick: the experience of debt problems and their relationship with health, illness and disability’, Social Policy and Society, 5, 1, 39–51. Bauman, Z. (1997), Postmodernity and Its Discontents, New York: New York University Press. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage. BERR (2007), Tackling Over-Indebtedness: Annual Report 2007, London: BERR. Berthoud, R. and Kempson, E. (1992), Credit and Debt: The PSI Report, London: Policy Studies Institute. Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Muriel, A. and Sibieta, L. (2007), Poverty and Inequality in Britain: 2007, London: IFS. Buck, A., Pleasance, P. and Balmer, N. (2008), ‘Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights’, Journal of Social Policy, 37, 4, 661–81. Burgess, R. G. (1991), In the Field, London: Routledge. Cook, D. (1989), Rich Law, Poor Law: Different Responses to Tax and Supplementary Benefit Fraud, Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Deacon, A. (2002), ‘Echoes of Sir Keith? New Labour and the cycle of disadvantage’, Benefits, 10, 3, 179–84. Deacon, A. (2004), ‘Different interpretations of agency within welfare debates’, Social Policy and Society, 3, 4, 447–56. Deacon, A. (2005), ‘An ethic of mutual responsibility? Toward a fuller justification for conditionality in welfare’, in L. Mead and C. Beem (eds.), Welfare Reform and Political Theory, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Deacon, A. and Mann, K. (1999), ‘Agency, modernity and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 28, 3, 413–35. Doble, M. (2000), ‘A regulatory policy for self-disconnection: an examination of the reasons for and implications of pre-payment meter stoppages’, Policy Studies, 21, 3, 229–43. Dominy, N. and Kempson, E. (2003), Can’t Pay or Won’t Pay, DCA Research Series 4/03, London: Lord Chancellor’s Department. Dwyer, P. (2000), Welfare Rights and Responsibilities, Bristol: The Policy Press. Edwards, S. (2003), In Too Deep, London: Citizens Advice. Etzioni, A. (1997), The New Golden Rule, London: Profile Books. Field, F. (1995), Making Welfare Work, London: Institute of Community Studies. Giddens, A. (1994), Beyond Left and Right, Cambridge: Polity. Grover, C. (2007), ‘The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 4, 534–45. Herbert, A. and Kempson, E. (1995), Water Debt and Disconnection, London: Policy Studies Institute. Hoggett, P. (2001), ‘Agency, rationality and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 30, 1, 37–56. Jencks, C. (1994), The Homeless, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kempson, E., McKay, S. and Willitts, K. (2004), Characteristics of Families in Debt and the Nature of Indebtedness, London: DWP. Le Grand, J. (1997), ‘Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 26, 2, 149–69. Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lister, R. (2004), Poverty, Cambridge: Polity Press. McKay, S. (2004), ‘Rising levels of household debt – how concerned should we be?’, Benefits, 12, 3, 199–201. Mead, L. (1986), Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship, New York: The Free Press. Mead, L. (ed.) (1997), The New Paternalism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Mead, L. (2004), Government Matters:Welfare Reform in Wisconsin, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Murray, C. (1984), Losing Ground, New York: Basic Books. Murray, C. (1990), The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Orton, M. (2004), ‘Irresponsible citizens? New Labour, citizenship and the case of non-payment of local taxation’, Critical Social Policy, 24, 4, 504–25. Orton, M. (2006), Struggling to Pay Council Tax: A New Perspective on the Debate about Local Taxation, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Parker, G. (1988), ‘Indebtedness’, in R. Walker and G. Parker (eds.), Money Matters, London: SAGE Publications. Public Legal Education and Support Task Force (2007), Developing Capable Citizens: The Role of Public Legal Education, London: Public Legal Education Task Force. Rock, P. (1973), Making People Pay, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. and O’Connor, W. (2003), ‘Carrying out qualitative analysis’, in J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage. Summers, B., Read, D. and Fylan, F. (2005), Literature in the Areas of Behavioural Economics and Psychology Relevant to theUnderstanding of an Individual’s Propensity to Engage with Their Creditors, London: Department for Constitutional Affairs. Taylor Gooby, P. (2008), ‘Assumptive worlds and images of agency: academic social policy in the twentyfirst century?’, Social Policy and Society, 7, 3, 268–80. Turley, C. and White, C. (2007), Assessing the Impact of Advice for People with Debt Problems: Final Report, London: Legal Services Research Centre. Welshman, J. (2004), ‘The unknown Titmuss’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 225–48. Williams, F. and Popay, J. (1999), ‘Balancing polarities: developing a new framework for welfare research’, in F.Williams, J. Popay and A. Oakely (eds.),Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press. Williams, F., Popay, J. and Oakley, A. (1999), ‘Changing paradigms of welfare’, in F. Williams, J. Popay and A. Oakley (eds.), Welfare Research: A Critical Review, London: UCL Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2568

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us