Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Do functional traits improve prediction of predation rates for a disparate group of aphid predators?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bell, J. R. (James R.), Mead, A. (Andrew), Skirvin, David J., Sunderland, K. D., Fenlon, John S. and Symondson, W. O. C. (William O. C.). (2008) Do functional traits improve prediction of predation rates for a disparate group of aphid predators? Bulletin of Entomological Research, Vol.98 (No.6). pp. 587-597. ISSN 0007-4853

[img] PDF
WRAP_Mead_Functional_traits.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (160Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007485308005919

Abstract

Aphid predators are a systematically disparate group of arthropods united on the basis that they consume aphids as part of their diet. In Europe, this group includes Araneae, Opiliones, Heteroptera, chrysopids, Forficulina, syrphid larvae, carabids, staphylinids, cantharids and coccinellids. This functional group has no phylogenetic meaning but was created by ecologists as a way of understanding predation, particularly for conservation biological control. We investigated whether trait-based approaches could bring some cohesion and structure to this predator group. A taxonomic hierarchy-based null model was created from taxonomic distances in which a simple multiplicative relationship described the Linnaean hierarchies (species, genera, etc.) of fifty common aphid predators. Using the same fifty species, a functional groups model was developed using ten behavioural traits (e.g. polyphagy, dispersal, activity, etc.) to describe the way in which aphids were predated in the field. The interrelationships between species were then expressed as dissimilarities within each model and separately analysed using PROXSCAL, a multidimensional scaling (MDS) program. When ordinated using PROXSCAL and then statistically compared using Procrustes analysis, we found that only 17% of information was shared between the two configurations. Polyphagy across kingdoms (i.e. predatory behaviour across animal, plant and fungi kingdoms) and the ability to withstand starvation over days, weeks and months were particularly divisive within the functional groups model. Confirmatory MDS indicated poor prediction of aphid predation rates by the configurations derived from either model. The counterintuitive conclusion was that the inclusion of functional traits, pertinent to the way in which predators fed on aphids, did not lead to a large improvement in the prediction of predation rate when compared to the standard taxonomic approach.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Statistics
Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Aphids -- Biological control, Multidimensional scaling, Functional groups, Behavior evolution
Journal or Publication Title: Bulletin of Entomological Research
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 0007-4853
Date: December 2008
Volume: Vol.98
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 587-597
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0007485308005919
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC)
Grant number: D19631/2 (BBSRC)
References: Agustı´, N., Shayler, S., Harwood, J.D., Vaughan, I.P., Sunderland, K.D. & Symondson, W.O.C. (2003) Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers. Molecular Ecology 12, 3467–3475. Ambrosino, M.D., Luna, J.M., Jepson, P.C. & Wratten, S.D. (2006) Relative frequencies of visits to selected insectary plants by predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae), other beneficial insects, and herbivores. Environmental Entomology 35, 394–400. Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Booij, C.J.H. & Tscharntke, T. (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 273, 1715– 1727. Blondel, J. (2003) Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100, 223–231. Borg, I. & Groenen, P. (2005) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. 614 pp. Springer, London. Cole, L.J., McCraken, D.I., Dennis, P., Downie, I.S., Griffin, A.L., Foster, G.N., Murphy, K.J. & Waterhouse, T. (2002) Relationships between agricultural management and ecological groups of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on Scottish Farmland. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 93, 323–336. Cummins, K.W. (1974) Structure and function of stream ecosystems. Bioscience 24, 631–641. Deagle, B.E. & Tollit, D.J. (2007) Quantitative analysis of prey DNA in pinniped faeces: potential to estimate diet composition? Conservation Genetics 8, 743–747. De Leeuw, J. & Heiser, W. (1980) Multidimensional Scaling with restrictions on the configuration. pp. 501–522 in Krishnaiah, P.R. (Ed.) Multivariate Analyses V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, North-Holland Publishing Company. Dill, M.L., Fraser, A.H.G. & Roitberg, B.D. (1990) The economics of escape behaviour in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Oecologia 83, 473–478. Dinter, A. (2002) Microcosm studies on intraguild predation between female erigonid spiders and lacewing larvae and influence of single versus multiple predators on cereal aphids. Journal of Applied Entomology 126, 249–257. Dumay, O., Tari, P.S., Tomasini, J.A. & Mouillot, D. (2004) Functional groups of lagoon fish species in Languedoc Roussillon, southern France. Journal of Fish Biology 64, 970– 983. Faber, J.H. (1991) Functional classification of soil fauna – a new approach. Oikos 62, 110–117. Finke, D.L. & Denno, R.F. (2005) Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades. Ecology Letters 8, 1299–1306. Foltan, P., Sheppard, S.K., Konvicka, M. & Symondson, W.O.C. (2005) The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR. Molecular Ecology 14, 4147–4158. Foster, T.E. & Brooks, J.R. (2005) Functional groups based on leaf physiology: are they spatially and temporally robust? Oecologia 144, 337–352. Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G.D. & Wheeler, W.C. (2001) Arthropoda phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413, 157–160. Griffiths, E. (1983) The feeding ecology of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale in cereal crops. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK. Grime, P. (2006) Use of plant trait databases to interpret long-term experiments on the impacts of changing landuse and climate. Presentation, Long-term studies in ecology: a celebration of 150 years of the Park Grass Experiment. Rothamsted Research, 22–24 May 2006, Harpenden, UK. Harper, G.L., King, R.A., Dodd, C.S., Harwood, J.D., Glen, D.M., Bruford, M.W. & Symondson, W.O.C. (2005) Rapid screening of invertebrate predators for multiple prey DNA targets. Molecular Ecology 14, 819–827. Harwood, J.D. & Obrycki, J.J. (2005) Web-construction behavior of linyphiid spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae): Competition and co-existence within a generalist predator guild. Journal of Insect Behaviour 18, 593–607. Harwood, J.D., Sunderland, K.D. & Symondson, W.O.C. (2004) Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Molecular Ecology 13, 3549– 3560. Heiser, W.J. & Meulman, J. (1983) Constrained multidimensional scaling, including confirmation. Applied Psychological Measurement 7, 381–404. Hemptinne, J.L., Dixon, A.F.G., Doucet, J.L. & Petersen, J.E. (1993) Optimal foraging by hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) and ladybirds (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) – mechanisms. European Journal of Entomology 90, 451–455. Hoogendoorn, M. & Heimpel, G.E. (2001) PCR-based gut content analysis of insect predators: using ribosomal ITS-1 fragments from prey to estimate predation frequency. Molecular Ecology 10, 2059–2067. Hwang, U.W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C.J. & Kim, W. (2001) Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413, 154–157. Ladislav, M. (1997) Classification of Vegetation: Past, Present and Future. Journal of Vegetation Science 8, 751–760. Lassau, S.A., Hochuli, D.F., Cassis, G. & Reid, C.A.M. (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Diversity and Distributions 11, 73–82. Lindborg, R. & Eriksson, O. (2005) Functional response to land use change in grasslands: Comparing species and trait data. Ecoscience 12, 183–191. Losey, J.E. & Denno, R.F. (1998) Positive predator-predator interactions: Enhanced predation rates and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79, 2143–2152. Maxey, L. (2006) Can we sustain sustainable agriculture? Learning from small-scale producer-suppliers in Canada and the UK. Geographical Journal 172, 230–244. Mayntz, D., Raubenheimer, D., Salomon, M., Toft, S. & Simpson, S.J. (2005) Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators. Science 307, 111–113. Pearson, M.H. (1980) Factors affecting populations of cereal aphids and their beetle predators. PhD thesis, University of London, London, UK. Pollet, M. & Desender, K. (1985) Adult and larval feeding ecology in Pterostichus melanarius Ill. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Mededelingen van der Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 50, 581–594. Read, D.S., Sheppard, S.K., Bruford, M.W., Glen, D.M. & Symondson, W.O.C. (2006) Molecular detection of predation by soil microarthropods on nematodes. Molecular Ecology 15, 1963–1972. Roschewitz, I., Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. (2005) Are landscape complexity and farm specialisation related to land-use intensity of annual crop fields? Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 105, 87–99. Rosenfeld, J.S. (2002) Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98, 156–162. Settle, W.H., Ariawan, H., Astuti, E.T., Cahyana, W., Hakim, A.L., Hindayana, D. & Lestari, A.S. (1996) Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77, 1975– 1988. Sheperd, S., Magnusson, M. & Sjo¨de´n, P.-O. (2005) Determinants of consumer behaviour related to organic foods. Ambio 34, 352–359. Sunderland, K.D. (1975) The diet of some predatory arthropods in cereal crops. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 507–515. Sunderland, K.D. (2002) Invertebrate pest control by carabids. pp. 165–214 in Holland, J.M. (Ed.) The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Andover, UK, Intercept Publishers. Symondson, W.O.C. (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology 11, 627–641. Symondson, W.O.C., Sunderland, K.D. & Greenstone, M.H. (2002a) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annual Reviews in Entomology 47, 561–594. Symondson, W.O.C., Glen, D.M., Ives, A.R., Langdon, C.J. & Wiltshire, C.W. (2002b) Dynamics of the relationship between a generalist predator and slugs over five years. Ecology 83, 137–147. Toft, S. (2005) The quality of aphids as food for generalist predators: implications for natural control of aphids. European Journal of Entomology 102, 371–383. Vattala, H.D., Wratten, S.D., Phillips, C.B., & Wackers, F.L. (2006) The influence of flower morphology and nectar quality on the longevity of a parasitoid biological control agent. Biological Control 39, 179–185.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2569

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us