Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Sovereign debt restructuring : the judge, the vultures and creditor rights

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Miller, Marcus, 1941- and Thomas, Dania (2006) Sovereign debt restructuring : the judge, the vultures and creditor rights. Discussion Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Miller_twerp_757.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (181Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

What role did the US courts play in the Argentine debt swap of 2005? What implications does this have for the future of creditor rights in sovereign bond markets? The judge in the Argentine case has, it appears, deftly exploited creditor heterogeneity – between holdouts seeking capital gains and institutional investors wanting a settlement – to promote a swap with a supermajority of creditors. Our analysis of Argentine debt litigation reveals a ‘judge-mediated’ sovereign debt restructuring, which resolves the key issues of Transition and Aggregation - two of the tasks envisaged for the IMF’s still-born Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism. For the future, we discuss how judge-mediated sovereign debt restructuring (together with creditor committees) could complement the alternative promoted by the US Treasury, namely collective action clauses in sovereign bond contracts.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Discussion Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
J Political Science > JX International law
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Debts, External -- Argentina, Debts, Public -- Argentina, Debt relief -- Argentina, Argentina -- Economic conditions -- 1983-
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: August 2006
Number: No.757
Number of Pages: 27
Institution: University of Warwick
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC), University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR)
Grant number: RES-051-27-0125 (ESRC)
Adapted As: Marcus Miller, Dania Thomas. (2007). Sovereign debt restructuring: the judge, the vultures and creditor rights. The World Economy 30(10), 1491–1509
Related URLs:
  • Other
References: Barnett, Barry C., Sergio J. Galvis, and Ghislain Gouraige, Jr. (1984.) On Third WorldDebt. Harvard International Law Journal, 25(winter):83-151. Buchheit Lee C. (1995). The Sovereign Client. Journal of International Affairs (Winter) 48:527. ___. (1998a). Changing Bond Documentation: The Sharing Clause. International Financial Law Review 17(7):17. ___. (1998b). The Collective Representation Clause. International Financial Law Review17(9):9. ___. (1999). A Lawyer’s Perspective on the New International Financial Architecture. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation 14(7):225-229. ___with Mitu Gulati. (2000). Exit Consents in Sovereign Bond Exchanges’. UCLA Law Review 48:59. ___with Mitu Gulati.(2002). Sovereign Bonds and the Collective Will Emory L.J 51:1317. ___. (2003). Collective Action Shows the way Forward. International Financial Law Review 1. ___. (2005). The Role of the Official Sector in Sovereign Debt Workouts. Chicago Journal of International Law 6(1):333-43. ___with Jeremiah S. Pam. (2004). Uruguay’s Innovations’. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation 19(1): 28-31. Bulow, Jeremy and Kenneth Rogoff. (1989). A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt. The Journal of Political Economy 97 (1):155-78. Cohen, Daniel and Richard Portes. (2005). How to Avoid Self Fulfilling Debt Crises LACEA 2005 Conference. Paris. Cordella, Tito and Eduardo. Levy-Yeyati. (2005). A (New) Country Insurance Facility IMF Working Paper 23. Dhillon, Amrita, Javier Garcia-Fronti, Sayantan Ghosal and Marcus Miller. (2006). Bargaining and Sustainability: The Argentine Debt Swap of 2005. The World Economy , April 2006. Dixon, Liz and David Wall. (2000). Collective Action Problems and Collective Action Clauses. Financial Stability Review Bank of England 8:142–51. Dooley, Michael. (2000). Can output losses following international financial crises be avoided? NBER Working Paper, No. 7531. Eaton, Jonathan and Mark Gersovitz. (1981). Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. The Review of Economic Studies 48(2):289-309. Eichengreen, Barry and Richard Portes. (1995). Crisis, What crisis? Orderly Workouts for Sovereign Debtors London:CEPR. Esteves, Rui Pedro. (2005). Quis custodiet quem? Sovereign Debt and Bondholders’ Protection before 1914. Mimeo. University of California, Berkeley. Fisch, Jill E and Caroline Gentile. (2004). Vultures or Vanguards? The Role of litigation in Sovereign debt Restructuring. Emory Law Journal 53:1043. Gai, P., S. Hayes and H. S. Shin. (2004). Crisis costs and debtor discipline: the efficacy of public policy in sovereign debt crises. Journal of International Economics 62:245-62. Gelpern, Anna. (2005). Building a Better Seating Chart for Sovereign Restructurings. Emory Law Journal 53:1119-61. ___. (2005). After Argentina. Policy Briefs in International Economics.(Available on the website of the Institute for International Economics). Ghosal, Sayantan and Marcus Miller. (2002). Co-ordination Failure, Moral Hazard, and Sovereign Bankruptcy Procedures. Economic Journal 113:276- 304. ___. (2006). Bargaining with Delay: Growth and Sustainability. Mimeo. University of Warwick. International Monetary Fund. (2003a). Proposed Features of a Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism. Legal and PDR Departments, IMF (available on the IMF’s website). ___. (2003b). Reviewing the Process for Sovereign Debt Restructuring within the Existing Legal Framework. PDR, International Capital Markets, and Legal Departments , IMF (available on the IMF’s website). ___. (2003c). The Restructuring of Sovereign Debt – Assessing the Benefits, Risks, and Feasibility of Aggregating Claims. Legal Department, IMF (available on the IMF’s website). Irwin, G., A. Penalver, C. Salmon and A. Taylor (2005) Dealing with country diversity: challenges for the IMF coinsurance model. Paper presented at LACEA 2005, Paris. Jeanne, Olivier and Roman Ranciere. (2005). The optimal level of international reserves for emerging market countries: formulas and applications. Mimeo, IMF. Jorgenson, E. & Jeffrey Sachs. (1992). Default and Renegotiation of Latin American Foreign bonds in the Interwar Period. in Barry Eichengreen & Peter H. Lindert (eds.) The International Debt Crises in Historical Perspective. MIT press. Kaletsky, Anatole. (1985). The Costs of Default, New York: Priority Press. Kletzer, Kenneth M. and Brian Wright. (2000). Sovereign Debt as Intertemporal Barter. American Economic Review 90(3):621-39. Kohlscheen, Emmanuel and S. A. O´Connell. (2003). A Recontracting Sovereign Debt Model with Trade Credit. Mimeo, I.I.E.S. Stockholm. Krueger, Anne. (2002). A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring. IMF: Washington, DC. Levy-Yeyati, Eduardo and Ugo Panniza. (2005). The Elusive Costs of Default. Mimeo, IADB. Liascovich, Carlos. (2005). Lavagna: la biografía. Buenos Aires: Planeta. Merlo, A. and C. Wilson. (1998). Efficient Delays in a Stochastic Model of Bargaining. Economic Journal, 11, 39-55. Miller, Marcus and Dania Thomas (2006). Sovereign Debt Restructuring: The Judge, the vultures and creditors rights CEPR DP No. 5710 (June). Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2005). From Rogue Creditors to Rogue Debtors: Implications of Argentina’s Default. Chicago Journal of International Law 6(1):311-26. Rochet, Jean-Charles. (2005). Optimal sovereign debt: an analytical approach. Mimeo. University of Toulouse. Rogoff, Kenneth. (1999). International institutions for reducing global financial instability. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Symposium, Fall. Roubini, Nouriel. (2003). Comments on Bulow, Sachs and White. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. ___. (2005). A Post–Mortem on the Argentine Debt Restructuring and How to Deal with the Holdout Creditors. (www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/107721). Roubini, Nouriel, and Brad Setser. (2004a). The Reform of the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Process: Problems, Proposed Solutions, and the Argentine Episode. Journal of Restructuring Finance 1 (1):1-12. Roubini, Nouriel and Brad Setser. (2004b). Bailouts and Bail-ins. Washington DC: Institute for International Finance. Sgard Jerome. (2004a) Are there such things as international property rights?. The World Economy, 27:3, March.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/26

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us