The Library

Evidence of neutral transcriptome evolution in plants

Tools

Broadley, Martin R., White, Philip J., Hammond, John P., Graham, Neil S. , Bowen, Helen C., Emmerson, Z. F., Fray, R. G. , Iannetta, P. P. M., McNicol, J. W. and May, Sean T.. (2008) Evidence of neutral transcriptome evolution in plants. New Phytologist, Vol.180 (No.3). pp. 587-593. ISSN 0028-646X

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Hammond_0380249-031108-Broadley_et_al_2008_New_Phytologist.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (492Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02640.x

Abstract

The transcriptome of an organism is its set of gene transcripts (mRNAs) at a defined spatial and temporal locus. Because gene expression is affected markedly by environmental and developmental perturbations, it is widely assumed that transcriptome divergence among taxa represents adaptive phenotypic selection. This assumption has been challenged by neutral theories which propose that stochastic processes drive transcriptome evolution. To test for evidence of neutral transcriptome evolution in plants, we quantified 18 494 gene transcripts in nonsenescent leaves of 14 taxa of Brassicaceae using robust cross-species transcriptomics which includes a two-step physical and in silicobased normalization procedure based on DNA similarity among taxa. Transcriptome divergence correlates positively with evolutionary distance between taxa and with variation in gene expression among samples. Results are similar for pseudogenes and chloroplast genes evolving at different rates. Remarkably, variation in transcript abundance among root-cell samples correlates positively with transcriptome divergence among root tissues and among taxa. Because neutral processes affect transcriptome evolution in plants, many differences in gene expression among or within taxa may be nonfunctional, reflecting ancestral plasticity and founder effects. Appropriate null models are required when comparing transcriptomes in space and time.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QK Botany
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Messenger RNA, Evolution (Biology)
Journal or Publication Title:	New Phytologist
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN:	0028-646X
Date:	17 September 2008
Volume:	Vol.180
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 587-593
Identification Number:	10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02640.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Centre for Plant Integrative Biology, Scotland. Environment and Rural Affairs Dept. (SEERAD)
References:	Bailey CD, Koch MA, Mayer M, Mummenhoff K, O’Kane SL, Warwick SI, Windham MD, Al-Shehbaz IA. 2006. Toward a global phylogeny of the Brassicaceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 2142–2160. Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Kellogg EA. 2006. Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. American Journal of Botany 93: 607–619. Brady SM, Orlando DA, Lee J-Y, Wang JY, Koch J, Dinneny JR, Mace D, Ohler U, Benfey PN. 2007. A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 318: 801–806. Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A. 2007. Zinc in plants. New Phytologist 173: 677–702. Ceplitis A, Su Y, Lascoux M. 2005. Bayesian inference of evolutionary history from chloroplast microsatellites in the cosmopolitan weed Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Molecular Ecology 14: 4221–4233. Craigon DJ, James N, Okyere J, Higgins J, Jotham J, May S. 2004. NASCArrays: a repository for microarray data generated by NASC’s transcriptomics service. Nucleic Acids Research 32: D575–D577. Felsenstein J. 1989. phylip-Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 164–166. Filatov V, Dowdle J, Smirnoff N, Ford-Lloyd B, Newbury HJ, Macnair MR. 2006. Comparison of gene expression in segregating families identifies genes and genomic regions involved in a novel adaptation, zinc hyperaccumulation. Molecular Ecology 15: 3045–3059. Gilad Y, Oshlack A, Rifkin SA. 2006. Natural selection on gene expression. Trends in Genetics 22: 456–461. Gould SJ. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. Graham NS, Broadley MR, Hammond JP, White PJ, May ST. 2007. Optimising the analysis of transcript data using high density oligonucleotide arrays and genomic DNA-based probe selection. BMC Genomics 8: 344. Hammond JP, Bowen HC, White PJ, Mills V, Pyke KA, Baker AJM, Whiting SN, May ST, Broadley MR. 2006. A comparison of the Thlaspi caerulescens and T. arvense shoot transcriptomes. New Phytologist 170: 239–260. Hammond JP, Broadley MR, Craigon DJ, Higgins J, Emmerson Z, Townsend H, White PJ, May ST. 2005. Using genomic DNA-based probe-selection to improve the sensitivity of high-density oligonucleotide arrays when applied to heterologous species. Plant Methods 1: 10. Hampton CR, Bowen HC, Broadley MR, Hammond JP, Mead A, Payne KA, Pritchard J, White PJ. 2004. Cesium toxicity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 136: 3824–3837. Hawes C, Begg GS, Squire GR, Iannetta PPM. 2005. Individuals as the basic accounting unit in studies of ecosystem function: functional diversity in shepherd’s purse, Capsella. Oikos 109: 521–534. Johnston JS, Pepper AE, Hall AE, Chen ZJ, Hodnett E, Drabek J, Lopez R, Price HJ. 2005. Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. Annals of Botany 95: 229–235. Khaitovich P, Enard W, Lachmann M, Pääbo S. 2006. Evolution of primate gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 693–702. Khaitovich P, Pääbo S, Weiss G. 2005. Toward a neutral evolutionary model of gene expression. Genetics 170: 929–939. Khaitovich P, Weiss G, Lachmann M, Hellmann I, Enard W, Muetzel B, Wirkner U, Ansorge W, Pääbo S. 2004. A neutral model of transcriptome evolution. PloS Biology 2: 0682–0689, doi: 10.1371/ journal.pbio.0020132. Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624–626. Koch MA, Dobeš C, Matschinger M, Bleeker W, Vogel J, Kiefer M, Mitchell-Olds T. 2005. Evolution of the trnF(GAA) gene in Arabidopsis relatives and the Brassicaceae family: monophyletic origin and subsequent diversification of a plastidic pseudogene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1032–1043. Narsai R, Howell KA, Millar AH, O’Toole N, Small I, Whelan J. 2007. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA decay rates and their determinants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 19: 3418–3436. Schmid M, Davison TS, Henz SR, Pape UJ, Demar M, Vingron M, Scholkopf B, Weigel D, Lohmann JU. 2005. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Genetics 37: 501–506. Schranz ME, Song B-H, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T. 2007. Comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: a family-wide perspective. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10: 168–175. Soltis DE, Ma H, Frohlich MW, Soltis PS, Albert VA, Oppenheimer DG, Altman NS, dePamphilis C, Leebens-Mack J. 2007. The floral genome: an evolutionary history of gene duplication and shifting patterns of gene expression. Trends in Plant Science 12: 358–367.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/261