Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Bayesian inference of biochemical kinetic parameters using the linear noise approximation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Komorowski, Michal, Finkenstädt, Bärbel, Harper, Claire V. and Rand, D. A. (David A.). (2009) Bayesian inference of biochemical kinetic parameters using the linear noise approximation. BMC Bioinformatics, Vol.10 (No.343). ISSN 1471-2105

[img] PDF
WRAP_Rand_bayesian.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (671Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-343

Abstract

Background Fluorescent and luminescent gene reporters allow us to dynamically quantify changes in molecular species concentration over time on the single cell level. The mathematical modeling of their interaction through multivariate dynamical models requires the deveopment of effective statistical methods to calibrate such models against available data. Given the prevalence of stochasticity and noise in biochemical systems inference for stochastic models is of special interest. In this paper we present a simple and computationally efficient algorithm for the estimation of biochemical kinetic parameters from gene reporter data. Results We use the linear noise approximation to model biochemical reactions through a stochastic dynamic model which essentially approximates a diffusion model by an ordinary differential equation model with an appropriately defined noise process. An explicit formula for the likelihood function can be derived allowing for computationally efficient parameter estimation. The proposed algorithm is embedded in a Bayesian framework and inference is performed using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Conclusion The major advantage of the method is that in contrast to the more established diffusion approximation based methods the computationally costly methods of data augmentation are not necessary. Our approach also allows for unobserved variables and measurement error. The application of the method to both simulated and experimental data shows that the proposed methodology provides a useful alternative to diffusion approximation based methods.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH426 Genetics
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Centre for Systems Biology
Faculty of Science > Mathematics
Faculty of Science > Statistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Genetics -- Mathematical models, Bayesian statistical decision theory -- Research, Biochemical genetics -- Research, Chemical kinetics -- Research, Biomathematics -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Bioinformatics
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1471-2105
Date: 19 October 2009
Volume: Vol.10
Number: No.343
Identification Number: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-343
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), European Union (EU), University of Warwick, Wellcome Trust (London, England), Prof. John Glover Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship
Grant number: BB/F005814/1 (BBSRC), 005137 (EU), EP/C544587/1 (EPSRC) 067252 (Wellcome)
References: 1. Ehrenberg M, Elf J, Aurell E, Sandberg R, Tegner J: Systems Biology Is Taking Off. Genome Res 2003, 13(11):2377-2380. 2. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS: Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell. Science 2002, 297(5584):1183-1186. 3. Nelson DE, Ihekwaba AEC, Elliott M, Johnson JR, Gibney CA, et al.: Oscillations in NF-kappaB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression. Science 2004, 306(5696):704-708. 4. Xie SX, Choi PJ, Li GW, Lee NK, Lia G: Single-Molecule Approach to Molecular Biology in Living Bacterial Cells. Annual Review of Biophysics 2008, 37:417-444. 5. Raser JM, O'Shea EK: Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control. Science 2005, 309(5743):2010-2013. 6. Keizer J: Statistical Thermodynamics of Nonequilibrium Processes Springer, New York; 1987. 7. Guptasarma P: Does replication-induced transcription regulate synthesis of the myriad low copy number proteins of Escherichia coli? Bioessays 1995, 17(11):987-97. 8. Moles CG, Mendes P, Banga JR: Parameter Estimation in Biochemical Pathways: A Comparison of Global Optimization Methods. Genome Res 2003, 13(11):2467-2474. 9. Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ: Bayesian Inference for Stochastic Kinetic Models Using a Diffusion Approximation. Biometrics 2005, 61(3):781-788. 10. Finkenstadt B, Heron E, Komorowski M, Edwards K, Tang S, Harper C, Davis J, White M, Millar A, Rand D: Reconstruction of transcriptional dynamics from gene reporter data using differential equations. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(24):2901. 11. Gillespie DT: A Rigorous Derivation of the Chemical Master Equation. Physica A 1992, 188(1-3):404-425. 12. Van Kampen N: Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North Holland 2006. 13. Mendes P, Kell D: Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation. Bioinformatics 1998, 14(10):869-883. 14. Ramsay JO, Hooker G, Campbell D, Cao J: Parameter estimation for differential equations: a generalized smoothing approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2007, 69(5):741-796. 15. Esposito W, Floudas C: Global Optimization for the Parameter Estimation of Differential-Algebraic Systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2000, 39(5):1291-1310. 16. Reinker S, Altman R, Timmer J: Parameter estimation in stochastic biochemical reactions. Systems Biology, IEE Proceedings 2006, 153(4):168-178. 17. Tian T, Xu S, Gao J, Burrage K: Simulated maximum likelihood method for estimating kinetic rates in gene expression. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:84. 18. Boys R, Wilkinson D, Kirkwood T: Bayesian inference for a discretely observed stochastic kinetic model. Statistics and Computing 2008, 18(2):125-135. 19. Wilkinson D: Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009, 10(2):122-133. 20. Heron EA, Finkenstadt B, Rand DA: Bayesian inference for dynamic transcriptional regulation; the Hes1 system as a case study. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(19):2596-2603. 21. Elerian O, Chib S, Shephard N: Likelihood Inference for Discretely Observed Nonlinear Diffusions. Econometrica 2001, 69(4):959-993. 22. Elf J, Ehrenberg M: Fast Evaluation of Fluctuations in Biochemical Networks With the Linear Noise Approximation. Genome Res 2003, 13(11):2475-2484. 23. Lars F, Per L, Andreas H: A Hierarchy of Approximations of the Master Equation Scaled by a Size Parameter. Journal of Scientific Computing 2007, 34(2):127-151. 24. Kurtz TG: The Relationship between Stochastic and Deterministic Models for Chemical Reactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1972, 57(7):2976-2978. 25. Arnold L: Stochastic differential equations: theory and applications Wiley- Interscience; 1974. 26. Oksendal B: Stochastic differential equations: an introduction with applications 3rd edition. Springer; 1992. 27. Brockwell P, Davis R: Introduction to time series and forecasting Springer New York; 2002. 28. Ronen M, Rosenberg R, Shraiman BI, Alon U: Assigning numbers to the arrows: Parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99(16):10555-10560. 29. Wu JQ, Pollard TD: Counting Cytokinesis Proteins Globally and Locally in Fission Yeast. Science 2005, 310(5746):310-314. 30. Gamerman D, Lopes HF: Markov Chain Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006. 31. Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A: Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001. 151588598 32. Chabot JR, Pedraza JM, Luitel P, van Oudenaarden A: Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Nature 2007, 450:1249-1252. 33. Komorowski M, Miekisz J, Kierzek A: Translational Repression Contributes Greater Noise to Gene Expression than Transcriptional Repression. Biophysical Journal 2009, 96(2):. 34. Gillespie DT: Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1977, 81(25):2340-2361. 35. Ryota T, Hidenori K, J KT, Kazuyuki A: Multivariate analysis of noise in genetic regulatory networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2004, 229(4):501-521.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2647

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us