Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty : a study focusing on women at midlife

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Griffiths, Frances, Green, Eileen and Bendelow, Gillian. (2005) Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty : a study focusing on women at midlife. Social Science & Medicine, Vol.62 (No.5). pp. 1078-1090. ISSN 0277-9536

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Griffiths_interventions_and_uncertainty_for_archive.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (104Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.027 ...

Abstract

Health professionals face a tension between focusing on the individual and attending to health issues for the population as a whole. This tension is intrinsic to medicine and gives rise to medical uncertainty, which here is explored through accounts of three medical interventions focused on women at midlife: breast screening, hormone replacement therapy and bone densitometry. The accounts come from interviews with UK health professionals using these medical interventions in their daily work. Drawing on the analysis of Fox [(2002). Health and Healing: The public/private divide (pp. 236–253). London: Routledge] we distinguish three aspects of medical uncertainty and explore each one of them in relation to one of the interventions. First is uncertainty about the balance between the individual and distributive ethic of medicine, explored in relation to breast screening. Second is the dilemma faced by health professionals when using medicial evidence generated through studies of populations and applying this to individuals. We explore this dilemma for hormone replacement therapy. Thirdly there is uncertainty because of the lack of a conceptual framework for understanding how new micro knowledge, such as human genetic information, can be combined with knowledge of other biological and social dimensions of health. The accounts from the bone denistometry clinic indicate the beginnings of an understanding of the need for such a framework, which would acknowledge complexity, recognising that factors from many different levels of analysis, from heredity through to social factors, interact with each other and influence the individual and their health. However, our analysis suggests biomedicine continues to be dominated by an individualised, context free, concept of health and health risk with individuals alone responsible for their own health and for the health of the population. This may continue to dominate how we perceive responsibilities for health until we establish a conceptual framework that recognises the complex interaction of many factors at macro and micro level affecting health.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Uncertainty, Women's health services
Journal or Publication Title: Social Science & Medicine
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0277-9536
Date: 19 October 2005
Volume: Vol.62
Number: No.5
Page Range: pp. 1078-1090
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.027
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Armstrong, D. (1995). The Rise of Surveillance Medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness, 17, 393-404. Ballard, K. (2002a). Understanding risk: women's perceived risk of menopause-related disease and the value they place on preventive hormone replacement therapy. Family Practice, 19:6, 591-595. Ballard, K. (2002b). Women's use of hormone replacement therapy for disease prevention; results of a community survey. British Journal of General Practice, 52, 835-837. Birke, L. (2003). Feminism and the idea of 'the biological'. In S. Williams,L. Birke, & G. Bendelow (Eds.), Debating Biology: Sociological reflections on health, medicine and society. (pp. 39-52). London: Routledge. Blaxter, M. (2003). Health Buckingham: OUP Boukes, F.S., Groeneveld, F.P.M.J., & Assendelft, W.J.J. (2003). 'Dutch College of General Practitioners' Position on Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). http://ntg.artsennet.nl/sitemap, 2005(22 February). Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences London: Routledge Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting Quantitative Data London: Sage Cancer Research UK (2004). Breast Cancer and Breast Screening CancerStats Report. London: Cancer Research UK. Committee on Safety of Medicines and Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (2003). HRT: Update on the risk of breast cancer and long-term safety, Current problems in Pharmacovigilance pp. 1-3). London: Committee on Safety of Medicines and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denny, E. (1996). New reproductive technologies: the views of women undergoing treatment. In S. Williams, & M. /calnan (Eds.), Modern medicine: lay perspectives and experiences. London: UCL Press. Edwards, A., Elwyn , G., & Mulley, A. (2002). Explaining risks; turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. British Medical Journal, 324, 827-830. Fairhurst, E. (1998). "Growing old gracefully" as opposed to "mutton dressed as lamb". In S. Nettleton, & J. Watson (Eds.), The body in everyday life. London: Routledge. Forrest, A.P.M. (1986). Breast Cancer Screening: Report to the Health Minister of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Island. London: HMSO. Foucault, M. (1976). The Birth of the Clinic London: Tavistock Fox, R.C. (2002). Medical Uncertainty Revisited. In G. Bendelow,M. Carpenter,C. Vautier, & S. Williams (Eds.), Gender, Health and Healing: The public / private divide (pp. 236-253). London: Routledge. Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Reckoning with risk London Glasziou, P., & Irwig, L.M. (1995). An evidence based approach to individualising treatment. BMJ, 311, 1356-1359. Gorovitz, S., & MacIntyre, A. (1976). Toward a Theory of Medical Fallibility. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1, 51-71. Green, E., Thompson, D., & Griffiths, F.E. (2002). Narratives of Risk: women at midlife, medical 'experts' and health technologies. Health Risk and Society, 4, 243-286. Griffiths, F. (1999). Women's control and choice regarding HRT. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 469-481. Griffiths, F. (2002). Compexity in Health Care: An introduction. In K.G. Sweeney, F. (Ed.), Complexity in Health Care. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press. Griffiths, F., & Green, E. (2003a). A normal biological process? Brittle bones, HRT and the patient-doctor encounter. In S. Williams,L. Birke, & G. Bendelow (Eds.), Debating Biology : Sociological Reflections on Health, Medicine, and Society. London: Routledge. Griffiths, F.E., & Green, E. (2003b). Managing health risks to women's midlife bodies: the patient-professional encounter. In S.J. Williams,G.A. Bendelow, & L. Birke (Eds.), Debating Biology: Sociological REflections on Health, Medicine and Society. London: Routledge. Griffiths, F.E., Green, E.E., Bendelow, G., & Backett-Milburn, K. (2003). Innovative Health Technologies at Women's Midlife; Theory and Diversity among women and Experts (L218252038): ESRC. Griffiths, F.E., Green, E., & Tsouroufli, M. (2005). The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: the example of midlife women. BMJ, 311, 511. Griffiths, F.E., Green, E., & Tsouroufli, M. (In Press). The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: the example of midlife women. BMJ. Harvey, D., & Reed, M.H. (1994). The Evolution of Dissipative Social Systems. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 17, 371-411. Holt, T. (2004). Complexity for Clinicians London: Radcliffe Medical Press Klein, R., & Dumble, L. (1994). Disempowering midlife women: the science and politics of HRT. Women's Studies International Forum, 17(4), 327-343. Lupton, D. (1998). Going with the flow: some central discourses in conceptualising and articulating the embodiment of emotional states. In S. Nettleton, & J. Watson (Eds.), The Body in Everyday Life. London: Routledge. Mant, D. (1994). Prevention. Lancet, 344, 1343-1346. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body Milton Keynes: Oxford Univeristy Press McWhinney, I.R. (1989). An Acquaintance with Particulars... Family Medicine, 21(4), 296-298. Million Women Study Collaborators (2003). Breast Cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet, 362, 419-427. Moss, N. (2002). Gender equity and socioeconomic inequality: a framework for the patterning of women's health. Social Science & Medicine, 54(5), 649-661. Nettleton, S. (1996). Women and the new paradigm of health and medicine. Critical Social Policy, 16, 33-53. Nettleton, S. (1997). Governing the Risky Self: how to become healthy, wealthy and wise. In A. Peterson, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault, Health and Medicine. London: Routledge. NIH (2004). Research Grants Database. http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/crisp. Oakley, A. (1984). The Captured Womb: a history of the medical care of pregnant women Oxford: Basil Blackwell Quinn, M. (2004). Trends and patterns in breast cancer incidence, survival and mortality in England and Wales, West Midlands Breast Screening Programme Quality Assurance Conference. Birmingham. Roberts, C. (2002). 'Successful Aging' with Hormone Replacement Therapy: It May Be Sexist, But What If It Works? Science as Culture, 11(1), 39-59. Rosenburg, C. (1998). Holism in Twentieth-Century Medicine, Greater than the parts Holism in Biomedicine 1920-1950 (pp. 335-355). New York: Oxford University Press. Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Teeth Society of Great Britain (2001). Osteoporosis: Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. London: Royal College of Physicians. School of Public Health, U.o.L., Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians. In association with the Department of Health, (1992). Effective Health Care: Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures. Leeds: University of Leeds. Sullivan, F., & MacNaughton, R.J. (1996). Evidence in consultations: interpreted and individualised. Lancet, 648, 941-943. Summerskill, William, S.M., & Pope, C. (2002). 'I saw the panic rise in her eyes and evidence-based medicine went out of the door.' An exploratory qualitative study of the barriers to secondary prevention in the management of coronary heart disease. Family Practice, 19:6, 605-608. Sweeney, K., & Griffiths, F. (2003). Complexity and Health Care: An Introduction Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press Tanenbaum, S.J. (1994). Knowing and Acting in Medical Practice: The Epistemological Politics of Outcomes Research. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 19, 27-44. Tannenbaum, C.B., Nasmith, L., & Mayo, N. (2003). Understanding older women's health care concerns: a qualitative study. Journal of Women and Aging, 15(1). Wadsworth, G., & Green, E. (2003). Changing women: an analysis of difference and diversity in women's accounts of their experiences of menopause. In S. Earle, & G. Letherby (Eds.), gender, identity and reproduction, social perspectives (pp. 205-221). London: Palgrave. Webster, A. (2004). Innovative Health Technologies ESRC Resaerch Programme. Wilkin, T., Devendra, D., Dequeker, J., & Luyten, F.P. (2001). Education and Debate: Bone densitometry is not a good predictor of hip fracture. BMJ, 323, 795-799. Williams, S., & Calnan, M. (1996). Modern medicine: lay perspectives and experiences London: UCL Press Willis, J. (1995). The Paradox of Progress Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002). Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women. JAMA, 288, 321-333.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/266

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us