The Library

A novel method of supplying nutrients permits predictable shoot growth and root: shoot ratios of pre-transplant bedding plants

Tools

Greenwood, Duncan J. , McKee, John M. T., Fuller, D. (Debbie), Burns, Ian G. and Mulholland, B. (Barry). (2007) A novel method of supplying nutrients permits predictable shoot growth and root: shoot ratios of pre-transplant bedding plants. Annals of Botany, Vol.99 (No.1). pp. 171-182. ISSN 0305-7364

PDF (Article Main Text)
WRAP_Greenwood_0380313-hr-290110-bedpap10d3.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (356Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.1)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig1.jpg
Download (184Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.2)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig2.jpg
Download (96Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.4)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig4.jpg
Download (218Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.5)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig5.jpg
Download (64Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.6)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig6.jpg
Download (61Kb)

Preview

Image (JPEG) (Fig.7)
WRAP_Greenwood_Fig_7.jpg
Download (67Kb)

PDF (Table S6)
WRAP_Greenwood_Table_S6.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (7Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl240

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Growth of bedding plants, in small peat plugs, relies on nutrients in the irrigation solution. The object of the study was to find a way of modifying the nutrient supply so that good-quality seedlings can be grown rapidly and yet have the high root : shoot ratios essential for efficient transplanting. METHODS: A new procedure was devised in which the concentrations of nutrients in the irrigation solution were modified during growth according to changing plant demand, instead of maintaining the same concentrations throughout growth. The new procedure depends on published algorithms for the dependence of growth rate and optimal plant nutrient concentrations on shoot dry weight Ws (g m–2), and on measuring evapotranspiration rates and shoot dry weights at weekly intervals. Pansy, Viola tricola ‘Universal plus yellow’ and petunia, Petunia hybrida ‘Multiflora light salmon vein’ were grown in four independent experiments with the expected optimum nutrient concentration and fractions of the optimum. Root and shoot weights were measured during growth. KEY RESULTS: For each level of nutrient supply Ws increased with time (t) in days, according to the equation {Delta}Ws/{Delta}t=K2Ws/(100+Ws) in which the growth rate coefficient (K2) remained approximately constant throughout growth. The value of K2 for the optimum treatment was defined by incoming radiation and temperature. The value of K2 for each sub-optimum treatment relative to that for the optimum treatment was logarithmically related to the sub-optimal nutrient supply. Provided the aerial environment was optimal, Rsb/Ro{approx}Wo/Wsb where R is the root : shoot ratio, W is the shoot dry weight, and sb and o indicate sub-optimum and optimum nutrient supplies, respectively. Sub-optimal nutrient concentrations also depressed shoot growth without appreciably affecting root growth when the aerial environment was non-limiting. CONCLUSION: The new procedure can predict the effects of nutrient supply, incoming radiation and temperature on the time course of shoot growth and the root : shoot ratio for a range of growing conditions.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > SB Plant culture
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Roots (Botany) -- Growth -- Research, Shoots (Botany) -- Growth -- Research, Growth (Plants) -- Research, Evapotranspiration, Plant nutrients
Journal or Publication Title:	Annals of Botany
Publisher:	Oxford University Press
ISSN:	0305-7364
Date:	January 2007
Volume:	Vol.99
Number:	No.1
Page Range:	pp. 171-182
Identification Number:	10.1093/aob/mcl240
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
Funder:	Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Grant number:	HH1413 SMU (DEFRA)
References:	Agren GI, Franklin O. 2003. Root:shoot ratios. Optimization and nitrogen productivity. Annals of Botany 92:795-2003. Belanger G, Richards JE. 1999. Relationships between P and N concentrations in timothy. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79: 65-70. Brewster JL, Sutherland RA. 1993. The rapid determination in controlled environments of parameters for predicting seedling growth rates in natural conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 122: 123-133. Broadley MR, Bowen HC, Cotterill HL,Hammond JP, Meacham MC, Mead A, White PJ. 2004. Philogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 321-336. Brouwer R. 1962. Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 10: 399-408. Ericsson T. 1995. Growth and shoot:ratios of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant and Soil 169: 205-214. Ericsson T, Ingestad T. 1988. Nutrition and growth of birch seedlings at varied relative phosphate addition rates. Physiologia Plantarum 72: 227-235 Greenwood DJ Draycott A. 1989. Quantitative relationships for growth and N content of different vegetable crops grown with and without ample fertilizer-N on the same soil. Fertilizer Research 18: 175-188. Greenwood DJ, Stone DA. 1998. Prediction and measurement of the decline in the critical-K, the maximum-K and total cation plant concentrations during the growth of field vegetable crops. Annals of Botany 82: 871-881.. Greenwood DJ, Cleaver TJ, Loquens SMH, Niendorf, KB. 1977. Relationship between plant weight and growing period for vegetable crops in the United Kingdom. Annals of Botany 41: 987-97. Greenwood DJ, Cleaver TJ, Turner MK, Hunt J, Niendorf KB, Loquens, SMH. 1980a. Comparison of the effects of potassium fertilizer on the yield, potassium content and quality of 22 different vegetable and agricultural crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 441-56. Greenwood DJ, Cleaver TJ, Turner MK, Hunt J, Niendorf KB, Loquens, SMH. 1980b. Comparison of the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield, nitrogen content and quality of 21 different vegetable and agricultural crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 471-85. Ingestad T, Lund A. 1979. Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. 1 Growth technique and growth. Physiology Plantarum 45: 137-148. James EC, van Iersel MW. 2001. Fertilizer concentration affects growth and flowering of sub irrigation petunias and begonias. Hort Science 36: 40-44. Lemaire G (ed) 1997. Diagnosis of the nitrogen status of crops. Berlin: Springer Scaife A, Cox EF, Morris GEL. 1987. The relationship between shoot weight, plant density and time during the propagation of four vegetable species. Annals of Botany 59: 325-334. Scoggins HL, Bailey DA, Nelson PV. 2002. Efficicacy of the press extraction method for bedding plant plug nutrient monitoring. Hort Science 37: 108-112. Smolders E, Merckx R. 1992. Growth and root-shoot partitioning of spinach plants as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Cell and Environment 15: 795-807. Smolders E, Buysse J, Merckx R.1993. Growth analysis of soil-grown spinach plants at different N-regimes. Plant and Soil 154: 73-80. Stamps, RH 2000. Management of nutrients in ornamental plant production systems in Florida: an overview. Proceedings of the Soil Science and Crop Science Society of Florida 59: 27-31. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological Stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. Thornley JHM. 1972. Balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Annals of Botany 36: 431-441. Tinker PB, Nye PH. 2000. Solute movement in the rhizosphere Oxford: Oxford University Press. Van Iersel M. 1999. Fertilizer concentration affects growth and nutrient concentration of subirrigated pansies. Hort Science 34: 660-663. Van Iersel MW, Beverley RB, Thomas PA, Latimer JG, Mills HA. 1999. Fertilizer effects on the growth of Impatiens, Petunia, Salvia, and Vinca plug seedlings. Research Report F-9904 Bedding Plant Foundation. Inc. Zandstra JW, Liptay A. 1999. Nutritional effects on transplant root and shoot growth – a review. Acta Horticulturae 504: 23-31.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/2680